Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

Current Value:
1.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0%), Hawaii has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.3%), Hawaii has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), Hawaii has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.1%).
Prior Value
(21.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.8%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
4.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.8%), Hawaii has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
21.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Hawaii has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Hawaii has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.5%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Hawaii has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.2%).
Prior Value
(36.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
2.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 2.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

Current Value:
1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.9%), Hawaii has a value of 1.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

58.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.5%), Hawaii has a value of 58.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (48.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(48.8%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

0.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.3%), Hawaii has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.1%), Hawaii has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.7%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.9%), Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
4.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Hawaii has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.3%).
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults Happy with Weight

49.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.4%), Hawaii has a value of 49.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Hawaii has a value of 49.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (49.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (52.4%).
Prior Value
(52.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

27.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.9%), Hawaii has a value of 27.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 27.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (27.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.6%).
Prior Value
(29.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36%)
<div> <div>NWS-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition is for adults age 20+ and this indicator is for adults 18+. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (22.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(22.8%)

County: Hawaii Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults who are Overweight

34.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.8%), Hawaii has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.2%), Hawaii has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.5%), Hawaii has a value of 36.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.6%), Hawaii has a value of 36.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.9%).
Prior Value
(33.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (43.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(43.1%)

County: Hawaii Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

37.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Hawaii has a value of 37.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

County: Hawaii Teens who are Obese

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens who are Obese

18.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3%), Hawaii has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.8%).
Prior Value
(13.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens who are Overweight

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens who are Overweight

13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
68.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.1%), Hawaii has a value of 68.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Hawaii has a value of 68.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(70.1% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (68.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.3%).
Prior Value
(72.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (76.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(76.8%)

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adult Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.5%), Hawaii has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

72.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 72.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (75.5%), Hawaii has a value of 72.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Hawaii has a value of 72.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (72.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (78.9%).
Prior Value
(78.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

Current Value:
24.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.7%), Hawaii has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Hawaii has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.4%).
Prior Value
(28.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
30.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Hawaii has a value of 30.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 30.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Get Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:
40.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.6%), Hawaii has a value of 40.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(45.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (40.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.8%).
Prior Value
(38.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4%)
<div>SH-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as adults who get an average of at least 7 hours of sleep. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source, but is the inverse, people who get fewer than 7 hours of sleep on average. The HP 2030 target has been adjusted accordingly.</span></div> <div> </div>

County: Hawaii Adults with Good Physical and Mental Health

Current Value:
48.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.3%), Hawaii has a value of 48.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.6%), Hawaii has a value of 48.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.6% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (48.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (51.4%).
Prior Value
(51.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Health Status of Good or Better

Current Value:
84.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.0%), Hawaii has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (83.0%), Hawaii has a value of 84.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (84.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.9%).
Prior Value
(85.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

37.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.2%), Hawaii has a value of 37.4%.
HI Value
(33.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 37.4%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

85.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 85.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (87.7%), Hawaii has a value of 85.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(87.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Hawaii has a value of 85.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (85.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (85.5%).
Prior Value
(85.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Hawaii Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Hawaii has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Women's Health

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:
12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9%), Hawaii has a value of 12.7%.
HI Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Hawaii has a value of 12.7%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (12.5%).
Prior Value
(12.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Property Crime Perpetrated by Adolescents and Young Adults

990
Arrests per 100,000 people aged 10-24 years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (879), Hawaii has a value of 990 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(879 in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (990) is less and better than the previously measured value (1,246).
Prior Value
(1,246)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Violent Crime Perpetrated by Adolescents and Young Adults

96
Arrests per 100,000 people aged 10-24 years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (235), Hawaii has a value of 96 which is lower and better.
US Value
(235 in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (96) is less and better than the previously measured value (183).
Prior Value
(183)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Violent Crime Rate

305
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (259), Hawaii has a value of 305 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(259)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (305) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (181).
Prior Value
(181)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Average Household Size

2.80
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.90), Hawaii has a value of 2.80.
HI Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Hawaii has a value of 2.80.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Female Population

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Female Population

50.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (49.7%), Hawaii has a value of 50.2%.
HI Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Hawaii has a value of 50.2%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (50.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.2%).
Prior Value
(50.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Foreign Born Persons

12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.0%), Hawaii has a value of 12.9%.
HI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Hawaii has a value of 12.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Households

72,468
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Male Population

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Male Population

49.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.3%), Hawaii has a value of 49.8%.
HI Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Hawaii has a value of 49.8%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (49.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.8%).
Prior Value
(49.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with Limited English Proficiency

Current Value:
8.8%
Percent of population 5+
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Hawaii has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.7%).
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

27.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Hawaii has a value of 27.1%.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Hawaii has a value of 27.1%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
0.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.4%), Hawaii has a value of 0.6%.
HI Value
(0.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Hawaii has a value of 0.6%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.6%).
Prior Value
(0.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population Asian

20.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.1%), Hawaii has a value of 20.2%.
HI Value
(37.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Hawaii has a value of 20.2%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (20.4%).
Prior Value
(20.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Black or African American

Current Value:
0.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.2%), Hawaii has a value of 0.9%.
HI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Hawaii has a value of 0.9%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.9%).
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Chinese

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population Chinese

19.9%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.0%), Hawaii has a value of 19.9%.
HI Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5%), Hawaii has a value of 19.9%.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Filipino

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population Filipino

39.6%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.6%), Hawaii has a value of 39.6%.
HI Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.2%), Hawaii has a value of 39.6%.
US Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
13.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.1%), Hawaii has a value of 13.9%.
HI Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Hawaii has a value of 13.9%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Japanese

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population Japanese

34.3%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.0%), Hawaii has a value of 34.3%.
HI Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 34.3%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Korean

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population Korean

4.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.2%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0%.
HI Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0%.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

12.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.3%), Hawaii has a value of 12.8%.
HI Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Hawaii has a value of 12.8%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population Over Age 65

23.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.4%), Hawaii has a value of 23.5%.
HI Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Hawaii has a value of 23.5%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (22.9%).
Prior Value
(22.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
44,910
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
31.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.7%), Hawaii has a value of 31.0%.
HI Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Hawaii has a value of 31.0%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (31.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (31.1%).
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population Under Age 18

21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.6%), Hawaii has a value of 21.0%.
HI Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Hawaii has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (21.1%).
Prior Value
(21.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population Under Age 5

5.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.5%), Hawaii has a value of 5.3%.
HI Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Hawaii has a value of 5.3%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population White

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Population White

34.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.2%), Hawaii has a value of 34.4%.
HI Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Hawaii has a value of 34.4%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (34.1%).
Prior Value
(34.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
30.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Hawaii has a value of 30.3%.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Hawaii has a value of 30.3%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (30.1%).
Prior Value
(30.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Sexual Minority Adults

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Sexual Minority Adults

5.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Hawaii has a value of 5.8%.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Sexual or Gender Minority Adults

Current Value:
6.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Hawaii has a value of 6.2%.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Total Population

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Total Population

206,315
People
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (206,315) is greater  than the previously measured value (203,792).
Prior Value
(203,792)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Veteran Population

8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 8.2%.
HI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Hawaii has a value of 8.2%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Community / Public Safety

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
39.8%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 39.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (33.5%), Hawaii has a value of 39.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Hawaii has a value of 39.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (39.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.7%).
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Motor Vehicle Collision Death Rate

Current Value:
11.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.9), Hawaii has a value of 11.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.8), Hawaii has a value of 11.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.5).
Prior Value
(11.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
<div> <div>IVP-06: Reduce deaths from motor vehicle crashes</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Hawaii Motor Vehicle-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
66.7
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (66.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (47.5).
Prior Value
(47.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Pedalcyclist Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Pedalcyclist Death Rate

0.51
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.51) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.52).
Prior Value
(0.52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
26.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 26.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (21.8%), Hawaii has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Internet Usage

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Internet Usage

87.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Hawaii has a value of 87.9%.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.0%), Hawaii has a value of 87.9%.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (87.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (81.3%).
Prior Value
(81.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Linguistic Isolation

3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 3.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.5%), Hawaii has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Hawaii has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
9,873
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Social Associations

6.8
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.5), Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.8) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.6).
Prior Value
(6.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
77.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (73.5%), Hawaii has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.7%).
Prior Value
(78.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
74.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (74.6%), Hawaii has a value of 74.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(74.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (82.2%).
Prior Value
(82.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Community Spending on Transportation

Current Value:
17.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4%), Hawaii has a value of 17.8%.
HI Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Hawaii has a value of 17.8%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

3.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (2.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Mean Travel Time to Work

27.5
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 27.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (26.6), Hawaii has a value of 27.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(26.6)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Hawaii has a value of 27.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
38.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 38.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (40.7%), Hawaii has a value of 38.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Hawaii has a value of 38.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.8%).
Prior Value
(37.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Active Transportation

Current Value:
3.3%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.2%), Hawaii has a value of 3.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.1%)

County: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Bicycling

Current Value:
0.4%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Hawaii has a value of 0.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.3%).
Prior Value
(0.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (0.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(0.9%)

County: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 0.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.3%), Hawaii has a value of 0.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 0.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
<div> <div>EH-02: Increase trips to work made by mass transit</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(5.3%)

County: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Walking

Current Value:
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Hawaii has a value of 2.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.8%)

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Employer Establishments

4,251
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4,251) is greater  than the previously measured value (4,178).
Prior Value
(4,178)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
56.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 56.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (59.0%), Hawaii has a value of 56.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(59.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Hawaii has a value of 56.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
54.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 54.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (57.4%), Hawaii has a value of 54.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(57.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Hawaii has a value of 54.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Size of Labor Force

96,803
Persons
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (96,803) is greater and better than the previously measured value (94,727).
Prior Value
(94,727)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Total Employment

49,112
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (49,112) is less  than the previously measured value (55,669).
Prior Value
(55,669)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Total Employment Change

-11.8%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of -11.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (-14.6%), Hawaii has a value of -11.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(-14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Hawaii has a value of -11.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (-11.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-0.8%).
Prior Value
(-0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
2.4%
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (2.9%), Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.5%), Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force: 25-64

5.4%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.8%), Hawaii has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Receive Food Stamps or SNAP

Current Value:
22.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.2%), Hawaii has a value of 22.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.7%).
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.7%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Receive Free Food

Current Value:
17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 17.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (12.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(12.9%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Report Food Scarcity

Current Value:
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.1%), Hawaii has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.7%).
Prior Value
(28.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.9%)

County: Hawaii Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (17.8%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Community Spending on Food

Current Value:
13.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.9%), Hawaii has a value of 13.8%.
HI Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.6%), Hawaii has a value of 13.8%.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.8%).
Prior Value
(13.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

37%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 37% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (49%), Hawaii has a value of 37% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(49%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Hawaii has a value of 37% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (35%).
Prior Value
(35%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Food Insecurity Rate

11.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 11.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (11.9%), Hawaii has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 11.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.5%).
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households Receiving SNAP

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Households Receiving SNAP

19.1%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.4%), Hawaii has a value of 19.1%.
US Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.7%).
Prior Value
(19.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
50.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.0%), Hawaii has a value of 50.1%.
HI Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Hawaii has a value of 50.1%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
6,692
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
29.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 29.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (24.6%), Hawaii has a value of 29.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (29.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.6%).
Prior Value
(33.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (15.1%), Hawaii has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
50.8%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 50.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (36.7%), Hawaii has a value of 50.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(36.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Hawaii has a value of 50.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (50.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (56.0%).
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Went Hungry

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Went Hungry

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Hawaii has a value of 6.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.6%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Went Hungry

Current Value:
5.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.4%), Hawaii has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.9%)

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 4.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.0%), Hawaii has a value of 4.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Hawaii has a value of 4.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households with Children Receiving Assistance

Current Value:
40.9%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.3%), Hawaii has a value of 40.9%.
HI Value
(25.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Hawaii has a value of 40.9%.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Community Spending on Housing

Current Value:
32.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.4%), Hawaii has a value of 32.9%.
HI Value
(33.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 32.9%.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii High Housing Burden

Current Value:

County: Hawaii High Housing Burden

33.3%
Percent of households
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.3%), Hawaii has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
19.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 19.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (18.0%), Hawaii has a value of 19.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.9%).
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Homelessness Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Homelessness Rate

48.6
Per 10,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.5), Hawaii has a value of 48.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.5 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (48.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (41.1).
Prior Value
(41.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
13.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (12.2%), Hawaii has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.5%).
Prior Value
(13.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Homeowner Vacancy Rate

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (1.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Homeownership

58.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 58.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (53.3%), Hawaii has a value of 58.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(53.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Hawaii has a value of 58.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Housing Units

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Housing Units

90,672
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (90,672) is greater  than the previously measured value (89,743).
Prior Value
(89,743)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:
$1,352
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($1,868), Hawaii has a value of $1,352 which is lower and better.
HI Value
($1,868)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Hawaii has a value of $1,352 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Median Housing Unit Value

$454,900
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($764,800), Hawaii has a value of $454,900 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
($764,800)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Hawaii has a value of $454,900 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$411
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($630), Hawaii has a value of $411 which is lower and better.
HI Value
($630)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Hawaii has a value of $411 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$2,005
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($2,778), Hawaii has a value of $2,005 which is lower and better.
HI Value
($2,778)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Hawaii has a value of $2,005 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

37.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 37.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (41.3%), Hawaii has a value of 37.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(41.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Hawaii has a value of 37.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.3%).
Prior Value
(42.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
<div> <div>SDOH-04:  Reduce the proportion of families that spend more than 30 percent of income on housing</div> <div> </div> <div>The data source for the national indicator is the American Housing Survey from which state-level data cannot be obtained. The state data source is the American Community Survey which is comparable to the national data source but the denominator is mortgaged owners rather than households. </div> </div>

County: Hawaii Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Overcrowded Households

7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Hawaii has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

49.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 49.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (55.8%), Hawaii has a value of 49.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(55.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 49.9%.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
<div>SDOH-04:  Reduce the proportion of families that spend more than 30 percent of income on housing</div> <div> </div> <div>The data source for the national indicator is the American Housing Survey from which state-level data cannot be obtained. The state data source is the American Community Survey which is comparable to the national data source but the denominator is renter-occupied housing units rather than households. </div> <div> </div>

County: Hawaii Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Severe Housing Problems

24.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Hawaii has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hawaii has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.3%).
Prior Value
(23.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
5.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Hawaii has a value of 5.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Gender Pay Gap

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Gender Pay Gap

$0.71
Cents on the dollar
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($0.76), Hawaii has a value of $0.71 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
($0.76)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($0.73), Hawaii has a value of $0.71 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($0.73)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii ($0.71) is less and worse than the previously measured value ($0.76).
Prior Value
($0.76)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (56.0%), Hawaii has a value of 49.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (49.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (53.4%).
Prior Value
(53.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (29.0%), Hawaii has a value of 34.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(29.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (30.9%).
Prior Value
(30.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Income Inequality

0.477
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 0.477 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (0.447), Hawaii has a value of 0.477 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.447)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Hawaii has a value of 0.477 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Median Household Income

$74,238
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of $74,238 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value ($94,814), Hawaii has a value of $74,238 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
($94,814)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Hawaii has a value of $74,238 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Per Capita Income

$37,236
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of $37,236 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value ($42,683), Hawaii has a value of $37,236 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
($42,683)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Hawaii has a value of $37,236 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens

Current Value:
33.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (34.4%), Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6%), Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.6%).
Prior Value
(41.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Households that Used Check Cashing, Cash Advance, or Title Loan Shops

1.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.9%), Hawaii has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.2%), Hawaii has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Households with a 401k Plan

Current Value:
36.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.1%), Hawaii has a value of 36.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.1%), Hawaii has a value of 36.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (36.2%).
Prior Value
(36.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Households with a Savings Account

Current Value:
71.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 71.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (75.3%), Hawaii has a value of 71.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.1%), Hawaii has a value of 71.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.9%).
Prior Value
(71.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Households with Student Loan Debt

Current Value:
7.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.3%), Hawaii has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Children Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
40.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 40.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (29.9%), Hawaii has a value of 40.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5%), Hawaii has a value of 40.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (40.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.3%).
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 19.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 19.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hawaii has a value of 19.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
24.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 24.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 825 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (17.6%), Hawaii has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5%), Hawaii has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (24.5%).
Prior Value
(24.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
10.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 10.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.5%), Hawaii has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Hawaii has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.0%), Hawaii has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii People 65+ Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
25.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (20.5%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 10.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (8.2%), Hawaii has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Hawaii has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
4,521
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
31.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (23.1%), Hawaii has a value of 31.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.4%), Hawaii has a value of 31.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (31.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.9%).
Prior Value
(28.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.6%), Hawaii has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Hawaii has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
<div>SDOH-01: Reduce the proportion of people living in poverty</div>

County: Hawaii Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (2.7%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Child Care Centers

7.4
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.1), Hawaii has a value of 7.4 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(7.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Hawaii has a value of 7.4 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.4) is greater and better than the previously measured value (5.3).
Prior Value
(5.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio

7.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 7.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.3%), Hawaii has a value of 7.3%.
HI Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Home Child Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
4.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 4.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (3.1%), Hawaii has a value of 4.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.