Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Older Adults
Health / Older Adults
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii Fall-Related ED Visit Rate, Adults 65+
County: Hawaii Fall-Related ED Visit Rate, Adults 65+
3,152.4
Visits per 100,000 population 65+
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3,450.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Fall-Related Hospitalization Rate, Adults 65+
County: Hawaii Fall-Related Hospitalization Rate, Adults 65+
784.1
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 65+
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(925.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii Adult Oral Health ED Visits
County: Hawaii Adult Oral Health ED Visits
661.2
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(379.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(596.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits
County: Hawaii Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits
843.4
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(560.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(826.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults 45+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Hawaii Adults 45+ with Total Tooth Loss
4.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.4%)
<div><span>OH-05: Reduce the proportion of adults aged 45 years and over who have lost all their teeth. <br /><br />The national indicator defined exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) which is based on a physical exam and from which data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data for this objective is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Hawaii Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
7.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services
County: Hawaii Adults Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services
0
Adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dentist
County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dentist
63.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(71.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(67.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Adults with No Recent Dental Visit
County: Hawaii Adults with No Recent Dental Visit
36.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(28.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(32.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults with One or More Tooth Extractions
County: Hawaii Adults with One or More Tooth Extractions
46.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(42.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults with Substantial Tooth Loss
County: Hawaii Adults with Substantial Tooth Loss
12.7%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Children Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services
County: Hawaii Children Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services
79
Children
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(26)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Dentist Rate
County: Hawaii Dentist Rate
63
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(90)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(64)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists
County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists
154
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(154)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims
County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims
57
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(60)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims
County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims
44
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(45)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Oral Health-Related ED Visits
County: Hawaii Oral Health-Related ED Visits
35.1
Visits per 10,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Hawaii Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist
County: Hawaii Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist
54.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(60.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance
County: Hawaii Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance
70.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(81.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(68.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(75.0%)
<div><span>AHS-02: Increase the proportion of people with dental insurance </span></div>
<div><span></span></div>
<div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey.</span></div>
37.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(41.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
28.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
County: Hawaii Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
77.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(75.9% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(78.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy
County: Hawaii Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy
36.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(44.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(40.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS
County: Hawaii Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS
69.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(74.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Women Who Knew Oral Health Was Important During Pregnancy
County: Hawaii Women Who Knew Oral Health Was Important During Pregnancy
81.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(85.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy
County: Hawaii Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy
81.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(84.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy
County: Hawaii Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy
14.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy
County: Hawaii Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy
41.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(47.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
75.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(81.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
Health / Other Conditions
Health / Other Conditions
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
19.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults with Arthritis
County: Hawaii Adults with Arthritis
26.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(22.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults with CKD Who Have High Blood Pressure
County: Hawaii Adults with CKD Who Have High Blood Pressure
61.6%
(2019, 2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(68.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(64.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(42.8%)
<div><span>CKD-06: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease who have elevated blood pressure<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>
County: Hawaii Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Hawaii Adults with Kidney Disease
4.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8%)
<div>
<div>CKD-01: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on age-adjusted laboratory values. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
County: Hawaii Adults With Two or More Chronic Conditions
County: Hawaii Adults With Two or More Chronic Conditions
41.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(35.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(40.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Hawaii Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Hepatitis B-Related Death Rate
County: Hawaii Hepatitis B-Related Death Rate
0.7
Per 100,000 People
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(0.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.16)
HP 2030 Target
(0.16)
<div><span>IID-15: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis B as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Hepatitis C-Related Death Rate
County: Hawaii Hepatitis C-Related Death Rate
3.9
Per 100,000 People
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.3 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(3.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.44)
HP 2030 Target
(1.44)
<div><span>IID-16: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis C as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Hawaii Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Hawaii Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Health / Physical Activity
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary
County: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(21.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
<div>
<div>PA-01: Reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on performing 10 minutes of physical activity. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
PAN Plan Target
(18.2%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
County: Hawaii Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
13.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Hawaii Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
County: Hawaii Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
69.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
25.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
57.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
42.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines
County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines
37.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(30.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Regularly Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood
County: Hawaii Adults Who Regularly Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(27.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(28.2%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood
County: Hawaii Adults Who Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood
48.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(60.3%)
County: Hawaii Adults Whose Neighborhood Supports Physical Activity
County: Hawaii Adults Whose Neighborhood Supports Physical Activity
30.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(66.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(33.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(74.4%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
County: Hawaii Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
9.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(39.0%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
County: Hawaii Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(9.6%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
County: Hawaii Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
42.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
County: Hawaii Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
39.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(37.3%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
20.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(24.1%)
<div>PA-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. </div>
County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
47.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(45.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(56.1%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
County: Hawaii Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
4.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(10.1%)
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(16.0%)
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
42.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(43.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(46.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
41.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(29.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(48.9%)
17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
24.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(28.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
46.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(48.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(48.8%)
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(14.2%)
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Physical
County: Hawaii Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Physical
16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(8.6% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Hawaii Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Sexual
County: Hawaii Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Sexual
9.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(1.8% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(4.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Experienced Non-Contact Sexual Abuse
County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Experienced Non-Contact Sexual Abuse
1.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Experienced Rape
County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Experienced Rape
3.0%
(2013)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Experienced Rape or Attempted Rape
County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Experienced Rape or Attempted Rape
5.6%
(2013)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Experienced Sexual Abuse Other Than Rape
County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Experienced Sexual Abuse Other Than Rape
1.0%
(2013)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Hawaii Adults Who Use Seat Belts in Cars
County: Hawaii Adults Who Use Seat Belts in Cars
94.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(95.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Assault-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Hawaii Assault-Related ED Visit Rate
268.7
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(356.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Assault-Related Hospitalization Rate
County: Hawaii Assault-Related Hospitalization Rate
22.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(21.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Drowning Death Rate
County: Hawaii Drowning Death Rate
4.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.3 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Fall-Related Death Rate 65+
County: Hawaii Fall-Related Death Rate 65+
26.5
Deaths per 100,000 population 65+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(51.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(69.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(63.4)
<div>
<div><span>IVP-08: </span> <span>Reduce fall-related deaths among older adults.</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>
</div>
County: Hawaii Firearm-Related Death Rate
County: Hawaii Firearm-Related Death Rate
6.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(14.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
<div>
<div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.healthypeople.gov/node/4768/data_details" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span class="bold"><span>IVP-13: </span></span><span>Reduce firearm-related deaths</span></a></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>
</div>
County: Hawaii Homicide Death Rate
County: Hawaii Homicide Death Rate
4.2
Per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.5 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(5.8 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.5)
<div><span>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Injury Death Rate
County: Hawaii Injury Death Rate
69.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(57.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(89.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(63.1)
<div>IVP-01: Reduce fatal injuries</div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div>
<p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p>
</div>
County: Hawaii Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Hawaii Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
8,832.8
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8,155.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
County: Hawaii Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
350.5
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(382.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Intentional Self Harm-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Hawaii Intentional Self Harm-Related ED Visit Rate
69.9
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(76.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Nonfatal Motor Vehicle-Related Injury Rate
County: Hawaii Nonfatal Motor Vehicle-Related Injury Rate
573.5
Injuries per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(536.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Nonfatal Pedestrian-Related Injury Rate
County: Hawaii Nonfatal Pedestrian-Related Injury Rate
17.4
Injuries per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(22.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Pedestrian Death Rate
County: Hawaii Pedestrian Death Rate
2.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.4 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Hawaii Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving
County: Hawaii Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving
37.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(36.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(40.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Hawaii Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
County: Hawaii Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Traumatic Brain Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Hawaii Traumatic Brain Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
756.8
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(639.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
County: Hawaii Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
76.6
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(71.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Unintentional Injury Death Rate
County: Hawaii Unintentional Injury Death Rate
40.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.0 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(64.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
<div>
<div>IVP-03: Reduce unintentional injury deaths</div>
<div> </div>
<p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p>
</div>
County: Hawaii Unintentional Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Hawaii Unintentional Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
5,607.8
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6,770.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Unintentional Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
County: Hawaii Unintentional Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
290.3
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(317.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Unintentional Poisoning-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Hawaii Unintentional Poisoning-Related ED Visit Rate
106.5
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(99.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Health / Respiratory Diseases
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii Adults 45+ with COPD
County: Hawaii Adults 45+ with COPD
6.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.5% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in a Car
County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in a Car
7.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)
County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in the Home
County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in the Home
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(5.4%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
County: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
6.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults with COPD
County: Hawaii Adults with COPD
4.5%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults with Current Asthma
County: Hawaii Adults with Current Asthma
10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate
County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate
1.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(0.89)
<div>RD-01: Reduce asthma deaths </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>
County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate 35-64 Yrs
County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate 35-64 Yrs
9.3
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 35-64
(2006-2015)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.2 in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(11.8 in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate 65+ Yrs
County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate 65+ Yrs
38.9
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 65+
(2006-2015)
Compared to:
HI Value
(47.6 in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(29.3 in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Hawaii Asthma: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan
(4.9%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>
County: Hawaii Children with Current Asthma
County: Hawaii Children with Current Asthma
10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan
(10.4%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>
County: Hawaii COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs
County: Hawaii COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs
60.3
Deaths per 100,000 population 45+ years
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(48.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(98.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(78.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(107.2)
<div>
<div><span class="bold"><span>RD-05: </span></span><span>Reduce deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among adults</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
</div>
County: Hawaii COPD: Medicare Population
County: Hawaii COPD: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Adults 65+
County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Adults 65+
37.5
Visits per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(32.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(21.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(26.1)
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div>
<div>RD-03: Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined for people ages 5 years and older. Hawaiʻi tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Children 0-4
County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Children 0-4
91.5
Visits per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(54.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(48.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(65.7)
HP 2030 Target
(64.3)
<div>
<div><span>RD-02: </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for children under 5 years with asthma</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma: 5-64 yrs
County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma: 5-64 yrs
51.9
Visits per 10,000 people 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(39.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(41.4)
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div>
<div><span>RD-03: </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined for people aged 5 years and older. Hawaii tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma 5-64 yrs
County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma 5-64 yrs
4.1
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(2.4)
County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma among Adults 65+
County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma among Adults 65+
2.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(2.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(4.8)
County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma Among Children 0-4
County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma Among Children 0-4
17.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(6.7)
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii AIDS Diagnosis Rate
County: Hawaii AIDS Diagnosis Rate
0.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(0.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(2.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Hawaii Chlamydia Incidence Rate
341.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(466.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(481.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(373.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Hawaii Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
60.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(102.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(73.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Hawaii Syphilis Incidence Rate
1.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(1.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance
County: Hawaii Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance
94.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(93.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(96.0%)
County: Hawaii Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP
County: Hawaii Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP
64.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(69.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(77.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(90.7%)
County: Hawaii Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP
County: Hawaii Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP
35.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(37.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(57.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(61%)
County: Hawaii Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline
County: Hawaii Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline
72.7
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(71.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(71.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(81)
County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke
County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke
8.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(17.3%)
<div>TU-19: Reduce the proportion of people who donʻt smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke</div>
<div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span>The national indicator is defined differently as the proportion of children, nonsmoking adolescents, and nonsmoking adults aged 3 years and over who had a serum cotinine level greater than or equal to 0.05 ng/mL and less than or equal to 10 ng/ml. </span>The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported data and only includes adults ages 18+.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in Multi-Unit Homes
County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in Multi-Unit Homes
30.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(43.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(29.6%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Attempted to Quit Smoking Cigarettes
County: Hawaii Adults Who Attempted to Quit Smoking Cigarettes
46.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(45.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(51.8% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(39.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(65.7%)
<div><span>TU-11: Increase past-year attempts to quit smoking in adults<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adults who quit in the past year. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(65.7%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
County: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device
County: Hawaii Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device
33.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help
County: Hawaii Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help
17.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(43.8%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Recently Quit Smoking Cigarettes
County: Hawaii Adults Who Recently Quit Smoking Cigarettes
9.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.6%)
<div>TU-14: Increase successful quit attempts in adults who smoke</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
<div> </div>
County: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes
County: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes
13.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>
TPC Plan Target
(6.1%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
County: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
45.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(63.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(61.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(52.7%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device
County: Hawaii Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device
7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(2.3%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Use Smokeless Tobacco
County: Hawaii Adults Who Use Smokeless Tobacco
2.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(0.8%)
County: Hawaii Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Hawaii Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
4.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Hawaii Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: Hawaii Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
2.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults Who Drink Excessively
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults Who Drink Excessively
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(9.0%)
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Depression
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Depression
22.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(24.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(9.5%)
16.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(9.8%)
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Income
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Income
24.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(8.2%)
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Poor Mental Health
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Poor Mental Health
23.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(19.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(9.3%)
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among LGBT Adults
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among LGBT Adults
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(8.1%)
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Native Hawaiian Adults
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Native Hawaiian Adults
19.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(8.3%)
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Unemployed Adults
County: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Unemployed Adults
24.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(12.0%)
County: Hawaii Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Hawaii Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
1.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Hawaii Illegal Tobacco Sales
County: Hawaii Illegal Tobacco Sales
8.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
US Value
(9.6% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)
County: Hawaii Smoke-Free Homes
County: Hawaii Smoke-Free Homes
92.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(93.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(89.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Smoke-Free Vehicles with Children
County: Hawaii Smoke-Free Vehicles with Children
1
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
County: Hawaii Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
39.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
County: Hawaii Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
8.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
County: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)
County: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
County: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
61.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(49.5%)
