Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
4.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.9%), Hawaii has a value of 4.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.1%), Hawaii has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii All-Cause Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
855.1
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (754.8), Hawaii has a value of 855.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(754.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (855.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (855.1).
Prior Value
(855.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Children without Health Insurance

Current Value:
2.6%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
8.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 8.2%.
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Hawaii has a value of 8.2%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Doctors of Osteopathy Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
5.9
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.1), Hawaii has a value of 5.9 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.9) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
6.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.5%), Hawaii has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services

15.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.6%), Hawaii has a value of 15.4%.
HI Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 15.4%.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.3%).
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Maternity Care Services

Current Value:
3.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.3%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4%.
HI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room

29.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.4%), Hawaii has a value of 29.9%.
HI Value
(27.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Hawaii has a value of 29.9%.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (29.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Medical Services in an Urgent Care Facility

24.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.1%), Hawaii has a value of 24.2%.
HI Value
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.9%), Hawaii has a value of 24.2%.
US Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services

7.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.1%.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.1%.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1%).
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Medicare Healthcare Costs

$6,729
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($7,190), Hawaii has a value of $6,729.
HI Value
($7,190)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Hawaii has a value of $6,729.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii ($6,729) is less  than the previously measured value ($6,739).
Prior Value
($6,739)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
75
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 75 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (82), Hawaii has a value of 75 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75) is greater and better than the previously measured value (69).
Prior Value
(69)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Number of Practicing Physician Assistants

Current Value:
12.8
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.8), Hawaii has a value of 12.8 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(24.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.8) is greater and better than the previously measured value (12.4).
Prior Value
(12.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Nurse Practitioner Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Nurse Practitioner Rate

47.6
Per 100,000 population
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (65.1), Hawaii has a value of 47.6 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(65.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.6) is greater and better than the previously measured value (46.8).
Prior Value
(46.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
94.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (95.6%), Hawaii has a value of 94.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(95.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.5%).
Prior Value
(94.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(92.4%)
<div> <div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the US Census Bureau- Small Area Health Insurance Estimates.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
47.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.1%), Hawaii has a value of 47.0%.
HI Value
(57.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Hawaii has a value of 47.0%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (48.8%).
Prior Value
(48.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
29.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.4%), Hawaii has a value of 29.4%.
HI Value
(21.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Hawaii has a value of 29.4%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (29.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (27.9%).
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons without Health Insurance

Current Value:
5.2%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.1%), Hawaii has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), Hawaii has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
1,799.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 1,799.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (1,581.0), Hawaii has a value of 1,799.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1,581.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Hawaii has a value of 1,799.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1,799.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,699.0).
Prior Value
(1,699.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
77
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 77 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (89), Hawaii has a value of 77 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(89)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77) is less and worse than the previously measured value (78).
Prior Value
(78)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
72.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (73.2%), Hawaii has a value of 72.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(73.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (72.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.6%).
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
65.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (70.2%), Hawaii has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (65.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.3%).
Prior Value
(66.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet

33.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.2%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8%.
HI Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8%.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults with Internet Access

Current Value:
91.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 91.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (95.0%), Hawaii has a value of 91.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.7%), Hawaii has a value of 91.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (91.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (93.8%).
Prior Value
(93.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households with a Computer

Current Value:
86.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90.5%), Hawaii has a value of 86.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.2%), Hawaii has a value of 86.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (86.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (85.8%).
Prior Value
(85.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households with a Smartphone

Current Value:
81.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 81.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (86.2%), Hawaii has a value of 81.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.7%), Hawaii has a value of 81.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (78.4%).
Prior Value
(78.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
87.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90.0%), Hawaii has a value of 87.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Hawaii has a value of 87.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

92.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (94.5%), Hawaii has a value of 92.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Hawaii has a value of 92.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
89.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 89.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (92.6%), Hawaii has a value of 89.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(92.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Hawaii has a value of 89.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol

Current Value:
22.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.3%), Hawaii has a value of 22.8%.
HI Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.1%), Hawaii has a value of 22.8%.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (23.2%).
Prior Value
(23.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure

31.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.5%), Hawaii has a value of 31.8%.
HI Value
(24.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.4%), Hawaii has a value of 31.8%.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (31.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Experienced a Heart Attack

Current Value:
4.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.5%), Hawaii has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (4.5%), Hawaii has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.4%), Hawaii has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.8%).
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
3.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.4%), Hawaii has a value of 3.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (4.4%), Hawaii has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.4%).
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

80.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (79.5%), Hawaii has a value of 80.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.2%).
Prior Value
(74.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HDS Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HDS Plan Target
(82.6%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist

Current Value:
18.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.1%.
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2%), Hawaii has a value of 18.1%.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with a Cholesterol Test, past 5 years

Current Value:
81.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.7%), Hawaii has a value of 81.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.3%), Hawaii has a value of 81.7% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.3%).
Prior Value
(83.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with High Blood Cholesterol

Current Value:
34.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.9%), Hawaii has a value of 34.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.6%), Hawaii has a value of 34.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.5%).
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
33.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (29.8%), Hawaii has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.1%), Hawaii has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.8%).
Prior Value
(31.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.6%)
<div>HDS-04: Reduce the proportion of adults with high blood pressure<br /> <br />The national indicator excludes pregnant women. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div>

County: Hawaii Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (11.0%), Hawaii has a value of 11.0%.
HI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Hawaii has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Congestive Heart Failure Death Rate

Current Value:
15.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.2), Hawaii has a value of 15.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.2 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.6), Hawaii has a value of 15.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4).
Prior Value
(16.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Coronary Heart Disease Death Rate

Current Value:
78.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (66.4), Hawaii has a value of 78.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(66.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (92.8), Hawaii has a value of 78.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(92.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (78.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.7).
Prior Value
(74.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HDS Plan Target (54.3), the target has not been met.
HDS Plan Target
(54.3)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
<div><span>HDS-02: Reduce coronary heart disease deaths<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Diseases of the Heart Death Rate

Current Value:
149.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (124.1), Hawaii has a value of 149.3 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(124.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (173.8), Hawaii has a value of 149.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(173.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (149.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (139.1).
Prior Value
(139.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (8.0%), Hawaii has a value of 8.0%.
HI Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Hawaii has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 63.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (70.0%), Hawaii has a value of 63.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Hawaii has a value of 63.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (63.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (61.0%).
Prior Value
(61.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
58.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (63.0%), Hawaii has a value of 58.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Hawaii has a value of 58.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (58.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (14.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Stroke Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Stroke Death Rate

46.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.6), Hawaii has a value of 46.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.6 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (41.1), Hawaii has a value of 46.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(41.1 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.5).
Prior Value
(41.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HDS Plan Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HDS Plan Target
(33.4)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
<div><span>HDS-03: Reduce stroke deaths   </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state</span></div>

County: Hawaii Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Hawaii has a value of 5.0%.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Hawaii has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Acute Hepatitis B Incidence Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.0), Hawaii has a value of 0.0.
HI Value
(0.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.1)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.1)
<div>IID-11: Reduce the rate of acute hepatitis B</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Hawaii Adult Influenza Vaccination Rate

Current Value:
40.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (47.3%), Hawaii has a value of 40.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(47.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (40.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.9%).
Prior Value
(37.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (70.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(70.0%)
<div> <div>IID-09: Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national objective includes all persons 6 months and older. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, which does not provide state-level data for Hawaiʻi. The state data sources are the National Immunization Survey for children 6 months to 17 years and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults 18 years and older, which are comparable to the national source. </div> </div>

County: Hawaii Adult Tetanus Vaccination

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adult Tetanus Vaccination

59.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (60.2%), Hawaii has a value of 59.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(60.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (71.3%), Hawaii has a value of 59.9% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(71.3% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (59.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (67.2%).
Prior Value
(67.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults 18-26 with HPV Vaccines

Current Value:
20.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.9%), Hawaii has a value of 20.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(32.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.5%).
Prior Value
(26.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (34.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(34.8%)

County: Hawaii Adults Tested for HIV in Past 2 Years

Current Value:
31.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.8%), Hawaii has a value of 31.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (31.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.5%).
Prior Value
(37.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.8
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 0.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (1.7), Hawaii has a value of 0.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Hawaii has a value of 0.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.1).
Prior Value
(2.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.06
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 9.06 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.46), Hawaii has a value of 9.06 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.46)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Hawaii has a value of 9.06 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.06) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.00).
Prior Value
(0.00)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
44.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 44.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (52.0%), Hawaii has a value of 44.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(52.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Hawaii has a value of 44.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Hepatitis B Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Hepatitis B Death Rate

0.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2010-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.3), Hawaii has a value of 0.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.3 in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.1), Hawaii has a value of 0.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.1 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.7).
Prior Value
(0.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Hepatitis C Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Hepatitis C Death Rate

1.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.5), Hawaii has a value of 1.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.5 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.7), Hawaii has a value of 1.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.6).
Prior Value
(1.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii HIV Testing Among Adults

Current Value:

County: Hawaii HIV Testing Among Adults

33.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (30.5%), Hawaii has a value of 33.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(30.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (36.3%), Hawaii has a value of 33.0% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Influenza Vaccination Rate 18-64 yrs

Current Value:
31.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.0%), Hawaii has a value of 31.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (31.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.5%).
Prior Value
(33.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (70.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(70.0%)
<div> <div>IID-09: Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national objective includes all persons 6 months and older. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, which does not provide state-level data for Hawaiʻi. The state data source for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source. </div> </div>

County: Hawaii Influenza Vaccination Rate 65+

Current Value:
59.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (70.2%), Hawaii has a value of 59.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (67.7%), Hawaii has a value of 59.7% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (59.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.6%).
Prior Value
(55.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (70.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(70.0%)
<div> <div>IID-09: Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national objective includes all persons 6 months and older. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, which does not provide state-level data for Hawaiʻi. The state data source for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source. </div> </div>

County: Hawaii Pneumonia Vaccination Rate 65+

Current Value:
56.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.0%), Hawaii has a value of 56.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (71.4%), Hawaii has a value of 56.7% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(71.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (56.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.6%).
Prior Value
(56.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (8.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
2.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.9), Hawaii has a value of 2.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.5), Hawaii has a value of 2.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.9).
Prior Value
(4.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Attended a Childbirth Class During Last Pregnancy

16.1%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.5%), Hawaii has a value of 16.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.5%), Hawaii has a value of 16.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Babies with Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
9.0%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Babies with Very Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
1.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.3%), Hawaii has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.3% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Hawaii has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.1%).
Prior Value
(1.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Birth Rate

10.0
Births per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.8), Hawaii has a value of 10.0.
HI Value
(10.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0), Hawaii has a value of 10.0.
US Value
(11.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1).
Prior Value
(10.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Births Delivered by Cesarean Section

Current Value:
30.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.6%), Hawaii has a value of 30.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 30.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.3%).
Prior Value
(34.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Births Delivered by Primary Cesarean Section

Current Value:
12.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.8%), Hawaii has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.6%), Hawaii has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Fetal Deaths

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Fetal Deaths

6.4
Deaths per 1,000 live births + fetal deaths
(2011-2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.4), Hawaii has a value of 6.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.4 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Hawaii has a value of 6.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.7 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.6).
Prior Value
(5.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii HIV Test During Pregnancy

Current Value:

County: Hawaii HIV Test During Pregnancy

62.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.6%), Hawaii has a value of 62.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.2%), Hawaii has a value of 62.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(65.2% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (62.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.7%).
Prior Value
(70.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Infant Deaths Due to All Birth Defects

Current Value:
0.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.9), Hawaii has a value of 0.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(0.9 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1), Hawaii has a value of 0.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.1).
Prior Value
(1.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Infant Deaths Due to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)

0.6
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2007-2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.2), Hawaii has a value of 0.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.4), Hawaii has a value of 0.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.4 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.7).
Prior Value
(0.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Infant Deaths Due to Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths

1.1
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2006-2008)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.9), Hawaii has a value of 1.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.9), Hawaii has a value of 1.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.9 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.9).
Prior Value
(1.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Infant Mortality Rate

5.0
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.5), Hawaii has a value of 5.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6), Hawaii has a value of 5.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.6 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.2).
Prior Value
(5.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (5.0), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.0)
<div><span>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR) </strong><br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Infants Still Breastfeeding at 8 Weeks

Current Value:
81.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.9%), Hawaii has a value of 81.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (68.5%), Hawaii has a value of 81.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(68.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.4%).
Prior Value
(78.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (94.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(94.4%)

County: Hawaii Infants Who Are Put to Sleep on Their Backs

Current Value:
77.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (83.0%), Hawaii has a value of 77.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (79.5%), Hawaii has a value of 77.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(79.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.6%).
Prior Value
(76.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mothers Who Ever Breastfed

Current Value:
94.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (94.5%), Hawaii has a value of 94.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.9%), Hawaii has a value of 94.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.9% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.8%).
Prior Value
(94.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

County: Hawaii Mothers Who Gained Appropriate Weight During Pregnancy

38.0%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.9%), Hawaii has a value of 38.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(36.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.4%).
Prior Value
(31.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mothers Who Had a Postpartum Care Visit

Current Value:
89.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (88.7%), Hawaii has a value of 89.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.1%), Hawaii has a value of 89.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.1% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (89.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.1%).
Prior Value
(89.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mothers who Received Early and Adequate Prenatal Care

58.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.1%), Hawaii has a value of 58.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.1%), Hawaii has a value of 58.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.1% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (58.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.9%).
Prior Value
(59.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mothers who Received Late or No Prenatal Care

Current Value:
11.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.4%), Hawaii has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Hawaii has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mothers Who Smoked 3-6 Months Postpartum

Current Value:
7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.8%).
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mothers Who Smoked in the Last Trimester of Pregnancy

4.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.7%), Hawaii has a value of 4.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.5%), Hawaii has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Neonatal Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Neonatal Mortality Rate

3.2
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.2), Hawaii has a value of 3.2.
HI Value
(3.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.5), Hawaii has a value of 3.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5).
Prior Value
(3.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Postpartum Relapse of Smoking

Current Value:
25.7%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (39.4%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(39.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.0%).
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Preterm Births

11.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.8%), Hawaii has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Hawaii has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
<div><span>MICH-07: Reduce preterm births<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Women who Abstained from Alcohol in Their Third Trimester

92.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (92.6%), Hawaii has a value of 92.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(92.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (92.0%), Hawaii has a value of 92.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(92.0% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (92.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.9%).
Prior Value
(92.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.2%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.2%)
<div> <div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.healthypeople.gov/node/4836/data_details" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>MICH-09:  </span> <span>Increase abstinence from alcohol among pregnant women</span></a></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as the percent of pregnant females ages 15 to 44 years who report no alcohol use in the previous 30 days.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Women Who Abstained from Drinking Prior to Pregnancy

45.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (43.5%), Hawaii has a value of 45.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(43.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (44.7%), Hawaii has a value of 45.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(44.7% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.3%).
Prior Value
(47.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Abstained from Illicit Drugs During Pregnancy

93.5%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (96.6%), Hawaii has a value of 93.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(96.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (97.0%).
Prior Value
(97.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Abstained from Illicit Drugs Prior to Pregnancy

93.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (94.6%), Hawaii has a value of 93.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.7%).
Prior Value
(90.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Abstained from Smoking Prior to Pregnancy

85.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (90.6%), Hawaii has a value of 85.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (86.0%), Hawaii has a value of 85.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (85.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.6%).
Prior Value
(89.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women who Binge Drink Prior to Pregnancy

Current Value:
15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.3%), Hawaii has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Hawaii has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.2%).
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Discussed Effects of Smoking with a HCW

68.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (72.1%), Hawaii has a value of 68.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (68.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.0%).
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Discussed Preconception Health with a HCW

31.5%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (40.7%), Hawaii has a value of 31.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 31.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (31.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.9%).
Prior Value
(40.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Women Who Drank Alcohol in Their Third Trimester of Pregnancy

7.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.4%), Hawaii has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1%).
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Had a Healthy Body Weight Prior to Pregnancy

42.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (48.1%), Hawaii has a value of 42.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(48.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (43.0%), Hawaii has a value of 42.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (46.7%).
Prior Value
(46.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Quit Smoking Cigarettes During Pregnancy

68.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (61.1%), Hawaii has a value of 68.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(61.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (68.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (52.0%).
Prior Value
(52.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (24.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(24.4%)
<div> <div>TU-15: Increase successful quit attempts in pregnant women who smoke cigarettes </div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as the percent of females who reported smoking cigarettes <span>at any time during the first and/or second trimester and reported not smoking during the third trimester of their pregnancy</span>.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Vital Statistics System.  The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Women Who Took Folic Acid or Vitamins Prior to Pregnancy

38.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.1%), Hawaii has a value of 38.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (43.6%), Hawaii has a value of 38.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.6% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression

14.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.6%), Hawaii has a value of 14.9%.
HI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Hawaii has a value of 14.9%.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adult Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
13.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.5%), Hawaii has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (15.7%), Hawaii has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.5%), Hawaii has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (21.6%), Hawaii has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.7%).
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who Experience Major Depressive Episodes

Current Value:
6.1%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Hawaii has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Grew Up with Drug Use in Household

Current Value:
13.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Grew Up with Mental Illness in Household

16.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.5%), Hawaii has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Grew Up with Problem Drinking in Household

23.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.4%), Hawaii has a value of 23.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.6%).
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults with 4+ Adverse Childhood Experiences

Current Value:
19.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.3%), Hawaii has a value of 19.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.6%).
Prior Value
(20.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Anxiety Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
49.4
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (172.7), Hawaii has a value of 49.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(172.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Delirium/Dementia Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

42.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.8), Hawaii has a value of 42.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(51.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (8.0%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

6.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 6.5%.
HI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Hawaii has a value of 6.5%.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
349
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 349 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (299), Hawaii has a value of 349 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(299)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (349) is greater and better than the previously measured value (337).
Prior Value
(337)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Schizophrenia Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

11.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.4), Hawaii has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Suicide Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Suicide Death Rate

19.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9), Hawaii has a value of 19.9 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.2), Hawaii has a value of 19.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.9).
Prior Value
(20.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(12.8)
<div><span>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Attempted Suicide

Current Value:
2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens With Disordered Eating

Current Value:
22.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.5%), Hawaii has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.2%).
Prior Value
(24.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Women with Depression Before Pregnancy

Current Value:
9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Hawaii has a value of 9.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1%).
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women with Post-Partum Depression

Current Value:
14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.4%), Hawaii has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Ever Attempted Suicide

Current Value:
2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens With Disordered Eating

Current Value:
18.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mortality Data

Health / Mortality Data

Health / Mortality Data

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mortality Data

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii All-Cause Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii All-Cause Mortality Rate

693.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (595.7), Hawaii has a value of 693.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(595.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (879.7), Hawaii has a value of 693.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(879.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (693.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (688.3).
Prior Value
(688.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Deaths Among Youth Aged 1-19 Years

Current Value:
22.2
Deaths per 100,000 population 1-19
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.9), Hawaii has a value of 22.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.4), Hawaii has a value of 22.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.4).
Prior Value
(21.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (18.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(18.4)
<div><strong>MICH-03: </strong>Reduce the rate of deaths in children and adolescents ages 1 to 19 years</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Hawaii Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Life Expectancy

80.2
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 80.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (81.8), Hawaii has a value of 80.2 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Hawaii has a value of 80.2 which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.6%), Hawaii has a value of 15.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.6%).
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (19.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(19.4%)

County: Hawaii Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days

Current Value:
41.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (39.3%), Hawaii has a value of 41.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(39.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Hawaii has a value of 41.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day

10.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.5%).
Prior Value
(10.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (10.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(10.4%)

County: Hawaii Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home

Current Value:
80.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.0%), Hawaii has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.0%), Hawaii has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73.4%).
Prior Value
(73.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days

33.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (38.3%), Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(38.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.4%), Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.3%).
Prior Value
(35.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Low Fruit Consumption

Current Value:
38.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.5%), Hawaii has a value of 38.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(42.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.0%), Hawaii has a value of 38.6% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.3%).
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Low Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
19.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.9%), Hawaii has a value of 19.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (19.8%), Hawaii has a value of 19.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(19.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.2%).
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Children Who Drank Soda with Sugar Yesterday

Current Value:
16.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.4%), Hawaii has a value of 16.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.2%).
Prior Value
(17.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.3%)

County: Hawaii Children Who Drank Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Yesterday

38.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.9%), Hawaii has a value of 38.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (25.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(25.2%)

County: Hawaii Children Who Drank Sweetened Drinks Yesterday

Current Value:
32.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.9%), Hawaii has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.7%)

County: Hawaii Children Who Eat Fast Food at Least Once Per Week

42.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (55.6%), Hawaii has a value of 42.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(55.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.2%).
Prior Value
(50.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (45.2%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(45.2%)

County: Hawaii Teen Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.8%), Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.3%), Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(22.3% in 2011)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.4%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day

11.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Hawaii has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.4%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages at Least Once Per Day

32.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (29.6%), Hawaii has a value of 32.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (26.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(26.3%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Drink Sweetened Juice Drinks at Least Once Per Day

11.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.7%), Hawaii has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.5%)

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
13.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 13.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.8%), Hawaii has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

39.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Hawaii has a value of 39.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (39.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.6%).
Prior Value
(38.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

29.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (40.8%), Hawaii has a value of 29.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (29.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (62.4%).
Prior Value
(62.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.5%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8%.
HI Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
16.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.7%), Hawaii has a value of 16.0%.
HI Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Hawaii has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.4%), Hawaii has a value of 7.2%.
HI Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Hawaii has a value of 7.2%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.9%), Hawaii has a value of 6.6%.
HI Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Hawaii has a value of 6.6%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.6%), Hawaii has a value of 13.8%.
HI Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Hawaii has a value of 13.8%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.0%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.