Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Primary Care Needs Assessment Tracker

The Primary Care Needs Assessment Data Tracker 2021 is a convenient tool for comparing common health statistics for the State of Hawai‘i to bring awareness to health disparities so we can figure out why they exist and what can be done to resolve them. This expands upon and updates the State of Hawai‘i Primary Care Needs Assessment Data Book 2016 using the 35 primary care service areas statewide. 
This data tracker was developed to assist policy makers, health planners, health care professionals, and community members in making assessments of the relative health risks and primary care health needs of these communities. 
Click on any of the health indicators to view tables, charts, and references with methodology and definitions. You can also see current trends or trends over time and get information about why the health indicator may be useful. It is hoped that this tracker will be a valuable update to the data book series and serve as a resource for population-level measures of risks along the life course from birth until death in the State of Hawai‘i. Click here to see a video about the tracker and how to use it.
Click here to access the PCNA Executive Summary.
 

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Hawaii

Population and Socio-Economic

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Population and Socio-Economic

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Total Population

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Total Population

1,440,196
People
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1,440,196) is less  than the previously measured value (1,447,154).
Prior Value
(1,447,154)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Under Age 18

20.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Hawaii has a value of 20.6%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (20.8%).
Prior Value
(20.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Over Age 65

20.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Hawaii has a value of 20.4%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (19.9%).
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
279,708
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

10.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Hawaii has a value of 10.3%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population White

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population White

25.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Hawaii has a value of 25.2%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Filipino

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Filipino

37.6%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.2%), Hawaii has a value of 37.6%.
US Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Japanese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Japanese

32.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 32.0%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Chinese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Chinese

21.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (22.5%), Hawaii has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Korean

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Korean

5.2%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 5.2%.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Black or African American

Current Value:
2.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Hawaii has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Persons without Health Insurance

Current Value:
4.1%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), Hawaii has a value of 4.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
21.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Hawaii has a value of 21.4%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (21.6%).
Prior Value
(21.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
88.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.8%), Hawaii has a value of 88.4% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (88.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.1%).
Prior Value
(90.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (83.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(83.9%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Did Not See a Doctor Due to Cost

Current Value:
5.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.1%), Hawaii has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Per Capita Income

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Per Capita Income

$42,683
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of $42,683 which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than $38,585 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than $36,754.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Hawaii has a value of $42,683 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Hawaii has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
<div>SDOH-01: Reduce the proportion of people living in poverty</div>

State: Hawaii Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force: 25-64

3.8%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

92.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 92.7% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Hawaii has a value of 92.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households with Children Receiving Assistance

Current Value:
25.3%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Hawaii has a value of 25.3%.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households Receiving SNAP

Current Value:
10.7%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.4%), Hawaii has a value of 10.7%.
US Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Foreign Born Persons

18.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Hawaii has a value of 18.0%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Linguistic Isolation

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 5.5% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Hawaii has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Homelessness Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Homelessness Rate

43.2
Per 10,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.5), Hawaii has a value of 43.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.5 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (43.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (41.3).
Prior Value
(41.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Sexual or Gender Minority Adults

Current Value:
6.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Maternal and Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Maternal and Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Birth Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Birth Rate

10.8
Births per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.0), Hawaii has a value of 10.8.
US Value
(11.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8).
Prior Value
(10.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Infant Mortality Rate

4.5
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.6), Hawaii has a value of 4.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.6 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.3).
Prior Value
(5.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (5.0), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.0)
<div><span>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR) </strong><br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Mothers who Received Late or No Prenatal Care

Current Value:
13.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Hawaii has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Babies with Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Births to Mothers Under 18 Years

Current Value:
0.6%
% of births to mothers <18
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.7%).
Prior Value
(0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Morbidity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Morbidity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 25.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36%)
<div> <div>NWS-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition is for adults age 20+ and this indicator is for adults 18+. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (22.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(22.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.5%), Hawaii has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(6.1%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device

Current Value:
8.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (2.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(2.3%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Heavily

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Heavily

8.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.8%), Hawaii has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary

21.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.5%), Hawaii has a value of 21.3% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
<div> <div>PA-01: Reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on performing 10 minutes of physical activity. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.5%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.8%).
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8%)
<div> <div>CKD-01: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease.</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on age-adjusted laboratory values. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults with Diabetes

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.6%), Hawaii has a value of 11.7% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Prediabetes

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults with Prediabetes

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
29.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.1%), Hawaii has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (29.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.7%).
Prior Value
(30.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.6%)
<div>HDS-04: Reduce the proportion of adults with high blood pressure<br /> <br />The national indicator excludes pregnant women. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div>

State: Hawaii

Mortality

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Mortality

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii All-Cause Mortality Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii All-Cause Mortality Rate

595.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (879.7), Hawaii has a value of 595.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(879.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (595.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (593.3).
Prior Value
(593.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Diseases of the Heart Death Rate

Current Value:
124.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (173.8), Hawaii has a value of 124.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(173.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (124.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (119.8).
Prior Value
(119.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Stroke Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Stroke Death Rate

38.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (41.1), Hawaii has a value of 38.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(41.1 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.2).
Prior Value
(41.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HDS Plan Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HDS Plan Target
(33.4)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
<div><span>HDS-03: Reduce stroke deaths   </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state</span></div>

State: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

118.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (146.4), Hawaii has a value of 118.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (118.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (119.5).
Prior Value
(119.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (107.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(107.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-1:  </span></span><span>Reduce the overall cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Unintentional Injury Death Rate

Current Value:
38.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (64.7), Hawaii has a value of 38.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(64.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8).
Prior Value
(36.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
<div> <div>IVP-03: Reduce unintentional injury deaths</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii

Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults with No Recent Dental Visit

Current Value:
28.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.8%), Hawaii has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.3%).
Prior Value
(25.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with One or More Tooth Extractions

Current Value:
38.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.4%), Hawaii has a value of 38.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adult Oral Health ED Visits

Current Value:
379.8
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (379.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (383.7).
Prior Value
(383.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits

Current Value:
560.1
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (560.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (571.7).
Prior Value
(571.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Mental Health & Substance Abuse

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Mental Health & Substance Abuse

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii All-Cause Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
754.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (754.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (754.8).
Prior Value
(754.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.