Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Hawaii

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

Current Value:
7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (1.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

Current Value:
57.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (49.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(49.5%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

Current Value:
2.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), Hawaii has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.8%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

State: Hawaii Teens who Smoke Cigars

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Teens who Smoke Cigars

2.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.2%).
Prior Value
(4.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Smoke Tobacco in a Hookah

Current Value:
3.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Tried to Quit Smoking

Current Value:
66.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (66.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.4%).
Prior Value
(68.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Hawaii has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.6%).
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors

Current Value:
2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

State: Hawaii Teens who Use Smokeless Tobacco

Current Value:
2.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.2%).
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use Tobacco YTS

Current Value:
33.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.2%).
Prior Value
(23.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Are Susceptible to Smoking Initiation

23.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.3%).
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
12.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.6%).
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Ever Tried Tobacco in a Hookah

Current Value:
1.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Hawaii has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.0% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
1.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

0.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

58.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (48.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(48.8%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

1.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.5%).
Prior Value
(10.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.7%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
1.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens who Smoke Cigars

Current Value:
1.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
5.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Smoke Tobacco in a Hookah

Current Value:
0.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Tried to Quit Smoking

Current Value:
70.7%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (70.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.6%).
Prior Value
(65.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens who Use Smokeless Tobacco

Current Value:
1.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Tobacco YTS

Current Value:
16.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Weight Screening and Follow Up

Current Value:
64.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (59.4%), Hawaii has a value of 64.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.4% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (64.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (70.1%).
Prior Value
(70.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (37.8%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(37.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Happy with Weight

51.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Hawaii has a value of 51.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (51.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 25.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36%)
<div> <div>NWS-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition is for adults age 20+ and this indicator is for adults 18+. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (22.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(22.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:
33.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.2%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.3%).
Prior Value
(35.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
37.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.6%), Hawaii has a value of 37.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.3%).
Prior Value
(37.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (43.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(43.1%)

State: Hawaii Children 10-17 Who Are Obese

Current Value:
17.1%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), Hawaii has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.5%).
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (15.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(15.5%)
<div><span>NWS-04:  Reduce the proportion of children and adolescents with obesity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes children and adolescents aged 2-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the National Survey of Children's Health, which is comparable to the national data source but is limited to children ages 10-17.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Children 3-16 Weight Screening and Follow Up

Current Value:
69.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (68.7%), Hawaii has a value of 69.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(68.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (69.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.1%).
Prior Value
(69.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (25.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(25.9%)

State: Hawaii Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

42.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (37.8%).
Prior Value
(37.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

State: Hawaii Insurance Benefits for Nutritional and Physical Activity Services

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Teens who are Obese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Teens who are Obese

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (16.3%), Hawaii has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens who are Overweight

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Teens who are Overweight

14.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Hawaii has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
71.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Hawaii has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.2%).
Prior Value
(69.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (76.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(76.8%)

State: Hawaii

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
9.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

75.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 75.5% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.5%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Hawaii has a value of 75.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.4%).
Prior Value
(83.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

24.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Hawaii has a value of 24.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.0%).
Prior Value
(30.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
25.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Get Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:
45.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.4%).
Prior Value
(39.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4%)
<div>SH-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as adults who get an average of at least 7 hours of sleep. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source, but is the inverse, people who get fewer than 7 hours of sleep on average. The HP 2030 target has been adjusted accordingly.</span></div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults with Good Physical and Mental Health

Current Value:
50.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.6%), Hawaii has a value of 50.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.6% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (50.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (55.8%).
Prior Value
(55.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Health Status of Good or Better

Current Value:
86.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (83.0%), Hawaii has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (86.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.8%).
Prior Value
(87.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

33.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 33.2%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

87.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 87.7% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.4% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.5%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Hawaii has a value of 87.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (87.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (88.3%).
Prior Value
(88.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

State: Hawaii

Health / Women's Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Women's Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:
15.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Hawaii has a value of 15.9%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Property Crime Perpetrated by Adolescents and Young Adults

853
Arrests per 100,000 people aged 10-24 years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (879), Hawaii has a value of 853 which is lower and better.
US Value
(879 in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (853) is less and better than the previously measured value (894).
Prior Value
(894)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Violent Crime Perpetrated by Adolescents and Young Adults

193
Arrests per 100,000 people aged 10-24 years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (235), Hawaii has a value of 193 which is lower and better.
US Value
(235 in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (193) is less and better than the previously measured value (203).
Prior Value
(203)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Violent Crime Rate

259
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (259) is less and better than the previously measured value (267).
Prior Value
(267)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Average Household Size

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Average Household Size

2.90
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Hawaii has a value of 2.90.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Female Population

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Female Population

49.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Hawaii has a value of 49.7%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (49.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (49.6%).
Prior Value
(49.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Foreign Born Persons

18.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Hawaii has a value of 18.0%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Households

483,906
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Male Population

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Male Population

50.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Hawaii has a value of 50.3%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (50.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (50.4%).
Prior Value
(50.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Persons with Limited English Proficiency

Current Value:
11.4%
Percent of population 5+
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Hawaii has a value of 11.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

25.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
0.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Hawaii has a value of 0.4%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.4%).
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Asian

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Asian

37.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Hawaii has a value of 37.1%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (37.2%).
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Black or African American

Current Value:
2.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Hawaii has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Chinese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Chinese

21.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (22.5%), Hawaii has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Filipino

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Filipino

37.6%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.2%), Hawaii has a value of 37.6%.
US Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Hawaii has a value of 11.1%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Japanese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Japanese

32.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 32.0%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Korean

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Korean

5.2%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 5.2%.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

10.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Hawaii has a value of 10.3%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Over Age 65

20.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Hawaii has a value of 20.4%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (19.9%).
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
279,708
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
24.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Hawaii has a value of 24.7%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.7%).
Prior Value
(24.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Under Age 18

20.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Hawaii has a value of 20.6%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (20.8%).
Prior Value
(20.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population Under Age 5

5.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Hawaii has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population White

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Population White

25.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Hawaii has a value of 25.2%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
21.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Hawaii has a value of 21.3%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.3%).
Prior Value
(21.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Sexual Minority Adults

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Sexual Minority Adults

6.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.4%).
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Sexual or Gender Minority Adults

Current Value:
6.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Total Population

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Total Population

1,435,138
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1,435,138) is less  than the previously measured value (1,439,399).
Prior Value
(1,439,399)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Veteran Population

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Veteran Population

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Hawaii has a value of 8.5%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Community / Governance

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community / Governance

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Statewide Policies that Increase Access to Healthy Food

3
Policies
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3).
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (2), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(2)

State: Hawaii

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
33.5%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 33.5% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Hawaii has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.5%).
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Motor Vehicle Collision Death Rate

Current Value:
5.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.8), Hawaii has a value of 5.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2).
Prior Value
(6.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
<div> <div>IVP-06: Reduce deaths from motor vehicle crashes</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Motor Vehicle-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
40.6
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (40.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.0).
Prior Value
(38.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Pedalcyclist Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Pedalcyclist Death Rate

0.13
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.13) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.28).
Prior Value
(0.28)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Children 0-5 with More Than 1 Hour of TV/Screen Time

68.9%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (67.9%), Hawaii has a value of 68.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(67.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (68.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (50.8%).
Prior Value
(50.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.7%)

State: Hawaii Children 6-11 with More Than 1 Hour of TV/Screen Time

93.2%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (92.4%), Hawaii has a value of 93.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(92.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (77.0%).
Prior Value
(77.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
21.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 21.8% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 21.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Internet Usage

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Internet Usage

90.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.0%), Hawaii has a value of 90.4%.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (90.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (83.7%).
Prior Value
(83.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Linguistic Isolation

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 5.5% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Hawaii has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Parents Who Read to Their Children Aged 0-5

Current Value:
44.8%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (38.6%), Hawaii has a value of 44.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (46.0%).
Prior Value
(46.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
53,291
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Social Associations

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Social Associations

6.5
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 6.5 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.7 while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 8.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Hawaii has a value of 6.5 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.5) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6.7).
Prior Value
(6.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
73.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (73.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (79.0%).
Prior Value
(79.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
74.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (79.8%).
Prior Value
(79.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Community Spending on Transportation

Current Value:
17.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Hawaii has a value of 17.4%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.4%).
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

2.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.3% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.8%).
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Mean Travel Time to Work

26.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 26.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.7.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Hawaii has a value of 26.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
40.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 40.7% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Hawaii has a value of 40.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (40.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.7%).
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Active Transportation

Current Value:
10.1%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.2%), Hawaii has a value of 10.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.1%)

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Bicycling

Current Value:
0.8%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Hawaii has a value of 0.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.8%).
Prior Value
(0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (0.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(0.9%)

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
<div> <div>EH-02: Increase trips to work made by mass transit</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(5.3%)

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Walking

Current Value:
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.4% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Hawaii has a value of 4.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.8%)

State: Hawaii

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Employed

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Employed

73.1%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (72.0%), Hawaii has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (73.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (72.0%).
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (75.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(75.0%)
<div><span>SDOH-02: Increase employment in working-age people <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator definition includes persons aged 16-64. The data source is the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Employer Establishments

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Employer Establishments

32,627
Number of Establishments
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32,627) is less  than the previously measured value (32,889).
Prior Value
(32,889)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
59.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 59.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Hawaii has a value of 59.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
57.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 57.4% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.9% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Hawaii has a value of 57.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Size of Labor Force

671,775
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (671,775) is less and worse than the previously measured value (672,910).
Prior Value
(672,910)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Total Employment

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Total Employment

469,179
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (469,179) is less  than the previously measured value (549,375).
Prior Value
(549,375)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Total Employment Change

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Total Employment Change

-14.6%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of -14.6% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than -3.7% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Hawaii has a value of -14.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (-14.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-0.7%).
Prior Value
(-0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
3.1%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Hawaii has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force: 25-64

3.8%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Receive Food Stamps or SNAP

Current Value:
14.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Receive Free Food

Current Value:
11.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (12.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(12.9%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Report Food Scarcity

Current Value:
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.7%).
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.9%)

State: Hawaii Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 17.8% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Hawaii has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Community Spending on Food

Current Value:
12.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.6%), Hawaii has a value of 12.9%.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

49%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 49% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 28% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Hawaii has a value of 49% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (49%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (44%).
Prior Value
(44%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Food Insecurity Rate

11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 11.9% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households Receiving SNAP

Current Value:
10.7%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.4%), Hawaii has a value of 10.7%.
US Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
50.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Hawaii has a value of 50.0%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

26,473
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households that Are Food Insecure

Current Value:
9.0%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.0%)
<div><span>NWS-01: Reduce household food insecurity and hunger <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (6.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(6.0%)

State: Hawaii Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
24.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 24.6% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

State: Hawaii Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

State: Hawaii Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
36.7%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 36.7% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 53.9%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 43 U.S. states.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Hawaii has a value of 36.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (39.5%).
Prior Value
(39.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Went Hungry

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Teens Who Went Hungry

5.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.6%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Went Hungry

Current Value:
5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.9%)

State: Hawaii

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households with Children Receiving Assistance

Current Value:
25.3%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Hawaii has a value of 25.3%.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Community Spending on Housing

Current Value:
33.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 33.4%.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (33.5%).
Prior Value
(33.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii High Housing Burden

Current Value:

State: Hawaii High Housing Burden

39.0%
Percent of households
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.3%), Hawaii has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (39.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (39.5%).
Prior Value
(39.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
18.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 18.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Homelessness Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Homelessness Rate

43.2
Per 10,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.5), Hawaii has a value of 43.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.5 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (43.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (41.3).
Prior Value
(41.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
12.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Hawaii has a value of 1.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Homeownership

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Homeownership

53.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 53.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Hawaii has a value of 53.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Housing Units

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Housing Units

568,075
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (568,075) is greater  than the previously measured value (564,882).
Prior Value
(564,882)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:
$1,868
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Hawaii has a value of $1,868 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:
$764,800
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Hawaii has a value of $764,800 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$630
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($584), Hawaii has a value of $630 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

$2,778
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Hawaii has a value of $2,778 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

41.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 41.3% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Hawaii has a value of 41.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (41.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.3%).
Prior Value
(41.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
<div> <div>SDOH-04:  Reduce the proportion of families that spend more than 30 percent of income on housing</div> <div> </div> <div>The data source for the national indicator is the American Housing Survey from which state-level data cannot be obtained. The state data source is the American Community Survey which is comparable to the national data source but the denominator is mortgaged owners rather than households. </div> </div>

State: Hawaii Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Overcrowded Households

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Hawaii has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

55.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 55.8% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 55.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
<div>SDOH-04:  Reduce the proportion of families that spend more than 30 percent of income on housing</div> <div> </div> <div>The data source for the national indicator is the American Housing Survey from which state-level data cannot be obtained. The state data source is the American Community Survey which is comparable to the national data source but the denominator is renter-occupied housing units rather than households. </div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Severe Housing Problems

25.7%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.2%).
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
5.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Gender Pay Gap

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Gender Pay Gap

$0.76
Cents on the dollar
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($0.73), Hawaii has a value of $0.76 which is higher and better.
US Value
($0.73)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii ($0.76) is less and worse than the previously measured value ($0.77).
Prior Value
($0.77)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

56.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (56.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (58.0%).
Prior Value
(58.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.