Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Hawaii

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Hepatitis B-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
1.1
Per 100,000 People
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.4), Hawaii has a value of 1.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.1).
Prior Value
(1.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (0.16), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.16)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.16), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.16)
<div><span>IID-15: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis B as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Hepatitis C-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
2.3
Per 100,000 People
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.2), Hawaii has a value of 2.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.5).
Prior Value
(2.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.44), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.44)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.44), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.44)
<div><span>IID-16: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis C as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Kidney Failure Among People with Diabetes

Current Value:
149.3
Per 1,000,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (163.6), Hawaii has a value of 149.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(163.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (149.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (170.5).
Prior Value
(170.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii New Cases of End-Stage Renal Disease

Current Value:
281.1
New cases per 1,000,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (356.0), Hawaii has a value of 281.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(356.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (281.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (302.6).
Prior Value
(302.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (378.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(378.2)

State: Hawaii Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Hawaii has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Hawaii has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary

21.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.5%), Hawaii has a value of 21.3% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
<div> <div>PA-01: Reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on performing 10 minutes of physical activity. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

Current Value:
18.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Hawaii has a value of 18.8%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (18.4%).
Prior Value
(18.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Current Value:
71.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Hawaii has a value of 71.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (63.7%).
Prior Value
(63.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

24.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Hawaii has a value of 24.8% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.6%).
Prior Value
(24.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

56.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 56.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (56.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

36.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 36.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.4%).
Prior Value
(36.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (40.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

37.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Hawaii has a value of 37.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Regularly Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood

27.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (27.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.9%).
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (28.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(28.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood

55.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (55.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.1%).
Prior Value
(56.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (60.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(60.3%)

State: Hawaii Adults Whose Neighborhood Supports Physical Activity

66.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (66.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.3%).
Prior Value
(68.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (74.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(74.4%)

State: Hawaii Certified Health and Physical Education Teachers

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Funding for Safe Routes to School

Current Value:
$550,000
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii ($550,000) is not statistically different from the previously measured value ($550,000).
Prior Value
($550,000)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target ($1,026,923), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
($1,026,923)

State: Hawaii Health and Physical Education Requirements in Grades 6 to 8

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Monitoring System to Assess Health and Physical Education Content and Performance in Schools

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii National Recommendations for Health and Physical Education Classes

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Physical Exam Requirement for Grade 7

Current Value:
1
Requirements
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0).
Prior Value
(1.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Policies Increasing Worksite Wellness Programs

Current Value:
1
Policies
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (2), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(2)

State: Hawaii Regular Recess at Elementary Schools

Current Value:
1.0
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0).
Prior Value
(1.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Schools Requiring Education on Physical Activity and Fitness

95.6%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (97.8%), Hawaii has a value of 95.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(97.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national median.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (95.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (95.6%).
Prior Value
(95.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii State Worksite Wellness Coordinator

Current Value:
1
Positions
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.5%).
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(39.0%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety

10.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.6%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

Current Value:
42.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (45.3%), Hawaii has a value of 42.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (33.3%).
Prior Value
(33.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time

34.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (28.3%).
Prior Value
(28.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (37.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(37.3%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (24.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(24.1%)
<div>PA-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. </div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (23.9%), Hawaii has a value of 23.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (17.1%).
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

Current Value:
45.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (44.9%), Hawaii has a value of 45.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.4%).
Prior Value
(40.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(56.1%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School

Current Value:
14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (10.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(10.1%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety

17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (16.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(16.0%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

43.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (43.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.5%).
Prior Value
(43.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time

44.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (33.1%).
Prior Value
(33.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (48.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(48.9%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

19.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.9%).
Prior Value
(16.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (26.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

46.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.0%).
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (48.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(48.8%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School

13.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (14.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(14.2%)

State: Hawaii

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Physical

Current Value:
11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (8.6%), Hawaii has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(8.6% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Sexual

Current Value:
5.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 5.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(1.8% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.6%).
Prior Value
(3.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use Seat Belts in Cars

Current Value:
93.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (94.2%), Hawaii has a value of 93.4% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.8%).
Prior Value
(92.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Assault-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
306.4
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (306.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (305.9).
Prior Value
(305.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Assault-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
20.9
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.7).
Prior Value
(20.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Drowning Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Drowning Death Rate

3.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.4), Hawaii has a value of 3.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.2).
Prior Value
(3.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Fall-Related Death Rate 65+

Current Value:
51.3
Deaths per 100,000 population 65+ years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (69.4), Hawaii has a value of 51.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(69.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (51.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.5).
Prior Value
(44.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (63.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(63.4)
<div> <div><span>IVP-08:  </span> <span>Reduce fall-related deaths among older adults.</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Firearm-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
3.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.6), Hawaii has a value of 3.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.9).
Prior Value
(3.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
<div> <div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.healthypeople.gov/node/4768/data_details" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span class="bold"><span>IVP-13:  </span></span><span>Reduce firearm-related deaths</span></a></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Firearm-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
5.3
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.6).
Prior Value
(4.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Homicide Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Homicide Death Rate

2.5
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.8), Hawaii has a value of 2.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.8 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.5).
Prior Value
(2.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.5)
<div><span>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Injury Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Injury Death Rate

57.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (89.0), Hawaii has a value of 57.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(89.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (57.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.4).
Prior Value
(53.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (63.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(63.1)
<div>IVP-01: Reduce fatal injuries</div> <div><span> </span></div> <div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Injury-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
6,890.1
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6,890.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6,589.6).
Prior Value
(6,589.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
297.6
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (297.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (289.8).
Prior Value
(289.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Intentional Self Harm-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
47.5
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (57.8).
Prior Value
(57.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Nonfatal Motor Vehicle-Related Injury Rate

Current Value:
397.5
Injuries per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (397.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (394.6).
Prior Value
(394.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Nonfatal Pedestrian-Related Injury Rate

Current Value:
23.7
Injuries per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.5).
Prior Value
(21.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Pedestrian Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Pedestrian Death Rate

1.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.7).
Prior Value
(1.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Safety Belt Usage- Observed

Current Value:
94.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (90.4%), Hawaii has a value of 94.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (97.1%).
Prior Value
(97.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Schools Requiring Education on Unintentional Injury

81.5%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (86.0%), Hawaii has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national median.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (79.6%).
Prior Value
(79.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Schools Requiring Education on Violence Prevention

89.4%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (92.6%), Hawaii has a value of 89.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(92.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national median.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (89.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (92.7%).
Prior Value
(92.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving

Current Value:
38.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.1%), Hawaii has a value of 38.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.3%).
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight

Current Value:
13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.3%), Hawaii has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Traumatic Brain Injury-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
712.2
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (712.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (680.3).
Prior Value
(680.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate

67.2
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (67.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (63.5).
Prior Value
(63.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Unintentional Injury Death Rate

Current Value:
38.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (64.7), Hawaii has a value of 38.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(64.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8).
Prior Value
(36.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
<div> <div>IVP-03: Reduce unintentional injury deaths</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Unintentional Injury-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
5,373.7
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5,373.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (5,516.2).
Prior Value
(5,516.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Unintentional Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate

238.4
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (238.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (231.2).
Prior Value
(231.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Unintentional Poisoning-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
89.0
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (89.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (85.6).
Prior Value
(85.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight

Current Value:
16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.5%).
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults 45+ with COPD

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults 45+ with COPD

5.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.5%), Hawaii has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.5% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in a Car

Current Value:
7.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in the Home

Current Value:
7.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (5.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(5.4%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma

Current Value:
6.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Hawaii has a value of 6.2%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with COPD

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults with COPD

3.5%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
9.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate

1.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.1), Hawaii has a value of 1.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.4).
Prior Value
(1.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.89), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.89)
<div>RD-01: Reduce asthma deaths </div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

State: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate 35-64 Yrs

Current Value:
28.8
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 35-64
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.8), Hawaii has a value of 28.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.5).
Prior Value
(19.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate 65+ Yrs

Current Value:
47.6
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 65+
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (29.3), Hawaii has a value of 47.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(29.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.3).
Prior Value
(44.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate <35 Yrs

Current Value:
2.7
Deaths per 1,000,000 population <35
(2006-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.6), Hawaii has a value of 2.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.2).
Prior Value
(3.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan (4.9%), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan
(4.9%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>

State: Hawaii Children with Current Asthma

Current Value:
9.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1%).
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan (10.4%), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan
(10.4%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>

State: Hawaii COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs

Current Value:

State: Hawaii COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs

48.0
Deaths per 100,000 population 45+ years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (98.6), Hawaii has a value of 48.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(98.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (48.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.3).
Prior Value
(53.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (107.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(107.2)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>RD-05:  </span></span><span>Reduce deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among adults</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

State: Hawaii COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Adults 65+

Current Value:
32.5
Visits per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.9).
Prior Value
(23.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (26.1), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(26.1)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (40.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div> <div>RD-03: Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined for people ages 5 years and older. Hawaiʻi tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Children 0-4

Current Value:
54.2
Visits per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (54.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (33.1).
Prior Value
(33.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (65.7), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(65.7)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (64.3), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(64.3)
<div> <div><span>RD-02:  </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for children under 5 years with asthma</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data.  The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma: 5-64 yrs

Current Value:
35.6
Visits per 10,000 people 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (35.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.2).
Prior Value
(26.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (41.4), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(41.4)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (40.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div> <div><span>RD-03:  </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined for people aged 5 years and older.  Hawaii tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data.  The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma 5-64 yrs

Current Value:
2.0
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2).
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (2.4), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(2.4)

State: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma among Adults 65+

Current Value:
1.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.7).
Prior Value
(1.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (4.8), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(4.8)

State: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma Among Children 0-4

Current Value:
10.2
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.1).
Prior Value
(4.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (6.7), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(6.7)

State: Hawaii Tuberculosis Among Foreign-Born Persons

Current Value:
36.3
Cases per 100,000 foreign-born population
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.0).
Prior Value
(44.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii AIDS Diagnosis Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii AIDS Diagnosis Rate

0.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.3).
Prior Value
(1.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Chlamydia Incidence Rate

384.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (495.5), Hawaii has a value of 384.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (384.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (420.6).
Prior Value
(420.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

102.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Hawaii has a value of 102.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(214.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (102.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (102.1).
Prior Value
(102.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Syphilis Incidence Rate

12.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (16.2), Hawaii has a value of 12.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.4).
Prior Value
(10.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance

Current Value:
94.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.5%).
Prior Value
(96.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (96.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(96.0%)

State: Hawaii Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP

Current Value:
69.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (69.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(90.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP

Current Value:
37.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (54.9%).
Prior Value
(54.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (61%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(61%)

State: Hawaii Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline

Current Value:
71.3
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.1).
Prior Value
(72.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (81), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(81)

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke

Current Value:
8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (17.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(17.3%)
<div>TU-19: Reduce the proportion of people who donʻt smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke</div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span></span></span></div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span>The national indicator is defined differently as the proportion of children, nonsmoking adolescents, and nonsmoking adults aged 3 years and over who had a serum cotinine level greater than or equal to 0.05 ng/mL and less than or equal to 10 ng/ml. </span>The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported data and only includes adults ages 18+.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in Multi-Unit Homes

34.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.8%).
Prior Value
(38.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (29.6%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(29.6%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Attempted to Quit Smoking Cigarettes

45.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (51.8%), Hawaii has a value of 45.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(51.8% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.3%).
Prior Value
(45.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.7%)
<div><span>TU-11: Increase past-year attempts to quit smoking in adults<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adults who quit in the past year.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (65.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(65.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking

Current Value:
1.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Hawaii has a value of 1.2%.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (1.3%).
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device

34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (28.0%), Hawaii has a value of 34.0% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.7%).
Prior Value
(24.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help

Current Value:
14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (43.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(43.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Recently Quit Smoking Cigarettes

Current Value:
9.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.6%)
<div>TU-14: Increase successful quit attempts in adults who smoke</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.5%), Hawaii has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(6.1%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
63.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (63.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.5%).
Prior Value
(70.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (52.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(52.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device

Current Value:
8.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (2.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(2.3%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use Smokeless Tobacco

Current Value:
2.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.4%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

5.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), Hawaii has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days

1.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 1.3% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (1.7%), Hawaii has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults Who Drink Excessively

16.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.0%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Depression

Current Value:
17.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.7%).
Prior Value
(19.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.5%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Educational Attainment

24.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7%).
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.8%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Income

Current Value:
20.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.3%).
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.2%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Poor Mental Health

20.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.5%).
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.3%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among LGBT Adults

Current Value:
13.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.1%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Native Hawaiian Adults

Current Value:
17.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.3%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Unemployed Adults

Current Value:
19.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (12.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(12.0%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
1.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.6%).
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Hawaii Tobacco Quitline Use

Current Value:
1.0%
Percent of adult smokers
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.9%).
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(2%)

State: Hawaii Illegal Tobacco Sales

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Illegal Tobacco Sales

6.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.6%), Hawaii has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.6% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (1.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)

State: Hawaii Indoor Worksites that Prohibit Smoking

Current Value:
69.8%
(2010-2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (69.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.8%).
Prior Value
(69.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Schools Requiring Education on Tobacco Use and Addiction

85.8%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (92.4%), Hawaii has a value of 85.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(92.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national median.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (85.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (83.6%).
Prior Value
(83.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Bars

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Bars

1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free College Campuses

Current Value:
0
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Commercial Daycare Centers

Current Value:
1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free High Schools

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free High Schools

79.0%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (79.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (76.0%).
Prior Value
(76.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Home-Based Daycare Centers

Current Value:
1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Homes

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Homes

93.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (90.7%).
Prior Value
(90.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Hospital Campuses

Current Value:
0
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Hotels and Motels

Current Value:
0
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Mental Health Treatment Facilities

Current Value:
1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Multiunit Housing

Current Value:
0
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Prisons and Correctional Facilities

Current Value:
0
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Private Workplaces

Current Value:
1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Public Entrances and Exits

Current Value:
0
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Public Transportation

Current Value:
1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Public Workplaces

Current Value:
1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Restaurants

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Restaurants

1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities

1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Vehicles with Children

Current Value:
0
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii State Tax on Cigarettes

Current Value:

State: Hawaii State Tax on Cigarettes

3.20
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.20) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.20).
Prior Value
(3.20)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (4.10), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(4.10)

State: Hawaii Teen Smokers Who Think Secondhand Smoke is Harmful

75.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.3%).
Prior Value
(81.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Are Susceptible to Smoking Initiation

21.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.7%).
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
32.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Hawaii has a value of 32.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (48.3%).
Prior Value
(48.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Ever Tried Tobacco in a Hookah

Current Value:
5.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.3%), Hawaii has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.3% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.3%), Hawaii has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)