Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
2.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.2), Maui has a value of 2.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.2), Maui has a value of 2.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Maui (2.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.5).
Prior Value
(3.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance

Current Value:
95.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (94.5%), Maui has a value of 95.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (95.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (97.3%).
Prior Value
(97.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (96.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(96.0%)

County: Maui Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP

Current Value:
71.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (69.2%), Maui has a value of 71.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(69.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (71.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.7%).
Prior Value
(71.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(90.7%)

County: Maui Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP

Current Value:
40.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.2%), Maui has a value of 40.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(37.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (40.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (56.6%).
Prior Value
(56.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (61%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(61%)

County: Maui Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline

Current Value:
71.1
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.3), Maui has a value of 71.1 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(71.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (71.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.4).
Prior Value
(71.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (81), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(81)

County: Maui Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke

Current Value:
10.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.4%), Maui has a value of 10.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (17.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(17.3%)
<div>TU-19: Reduce the proportion of people who donʻt smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke</div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span></span></span></div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span>The national indicator is defined differently as the proportion of children, nonsmoking adolescents, and nonsmoking adults aged 3 years and over who had a serum cotinine level greater than or equal to 0.05 ng/mL and less than or equal to 10 ng/ml. </span>The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported data and only includes adults ages 18+.</span></div>

County: Maui Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in Multi-Unit Homes

33.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4%), Maui has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (33.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.3%).
Prior Value
(43.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (29.6%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(29.6%)

County: Maui Adults Who Attempted to Quit Smoking Cigarettes

44.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.8%), Maui has a value of 44.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(45.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (51.8%), Maui has a value of 44.4% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(51.8% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (44.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.2%).
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.7%)
<div><span>TU-11: Increase past-year attempts to quit smoking in adults<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adults who quit in the past year.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (65.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(65.7%)

County: Maui Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking

Current Value:
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2%), Maui has a value of 1.4%.
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Maui has a value of 1.4%.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device

32.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.0%), Maui has a value of 32.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (28.0%), Maui has a value of 32.1% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (32.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.5%).
Prior Value
(23.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help

Current Value:
18.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.2%), Maui has a value of 18.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (18.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.8%).
Prior Value
(23.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (43.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(43.8%)

County: Maui Adults Who Recently Quit Smoking Cigarettes

Current Value:
12.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.2%), Maui has a value of 12.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.6%)
<div>TU-14: Increase successful quit attempts in adults who smoke</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div> <div> </div>

County: Maui Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
10.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Maui has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.5%), Maui has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(6.1%)

County: Maui Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
49.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (63.7%), Maui has a value of 49.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(63.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (49.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (61.5%).
Prior Value
(61.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (52.7%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(52.7%)

County: Maui Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device

Current Value:
9.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.8%), Maui has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Maui has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (9.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (2.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(2.3%)

County: Maui Adults Who Use Smokeless Tobacco

Current Value:
2.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Maui has a value of 2.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.4%), Maui has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (2.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.8%)

County: Maui Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

4.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Maui has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), Maui has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Maui Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days

1.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (1.3%), Maui has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7%), Maui has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Cigarette Smoking among Adults Who Drink Excessively

22.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.8%), Maui has a value of 22.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (22.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.5%).
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.0%)

County: Maui Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Depression

12.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.7%), Maui has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.5%)

County: Maui Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Educational Attainment

32.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.1%), Maui has a value of 32.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (32.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Maui Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Income

18.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.1%), Maui has a value of 18.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (18.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.2%)

County: Maui Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Poor Mental Health

13.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.5%), Maui has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.3%).
Prior Value
(21.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.3%)

County: Maui Cigarette Smoking among LGBT Adults

Current Value:
25.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.2%), Maui has a value of 25.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (25.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.2%).
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.1%)

County: Maui Cigarette Smoking among Native Hawaiian Adults

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4%), Maui has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.9%).
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.3%)

County: Maui Cigarette Smoking among Unemployed Adults

Current Value:
15.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.5%), Maui has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (15.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.2%).
Prior Value
(44.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (12.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(12.0%)

County: Maui Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 1.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (1.6%), Maui has a value of 1.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.6%).
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Illegal Tobacco Sales

Current Value:

County: Maui Illegal Tobacco Sales

14.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.6%), Maui has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.6% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (14.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (1.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)

County: Maui Smoke-Free Homes

Current Value:

County: Maui Smoke-Free Homes

93.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (93.2%), Maui has a value of 93.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(93.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (93.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.4%).
Prior Value
(91.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Smoke-Free Vehicles with Children

Current Value:
0
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
36.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.4%), Maui has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Maui has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (36.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (58.1%).
Prior Value
(58.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

County: Maui Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Maui has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.3%), Maui has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

Current Value:
8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.6%), Maui has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (1.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)

County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

Current Value:
51.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.8%), Maui has a value of 51.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (49.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(49.5%)

County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

Current Value:
1.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0%), Maui has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Maui Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.3%), Maui has a value of 13.3%.
HI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), Maui has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (13.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.7%).
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.8%)

County: Maui Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
4.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Maui has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Maui has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Maui Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
18.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.8%), Maui has a value of 18.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Maui Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Maui has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Maui has a value of 18.0%.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (18.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.4%).
Prior Value
(36.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

County: Maui Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors

Current Value:
2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.5%), Maui has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Maui has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (15.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
1.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Maui has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

2.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.9%), Maui has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

47.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.5%), Maui has a value of 47.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (48.8%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(48.8%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.3%), Maui has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.1%), Maui has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.7%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
1.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.9%), Maui has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Maui has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Maui has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.7%).
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:
49.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.4%), Maui has a value of 49.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Maui has a value of 49.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (49.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (53.5%).
Prior Value
(53.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Maui Adults Who Are Obese

24.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.9%), Maui has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (33.6%), Maui has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (24.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.3%).
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36%)
<div> <div>NWS-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition is for adults age 20+ and this indicator is for adults 18+. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (22.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(22.8%)

County: Maui Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:
35.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.8%), Maui has a value of 35.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.2%), Maui has a value of 35.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (35.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.1%).
Prior Value
(36.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
36.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.5%), Maui has a value of 36.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.6%), Maui has a value of 36.8% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (36.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (43.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(43.1%)

County: Maui Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

41.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Maui has a value of 41.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (41.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.7%).
Prior Value
(32.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

County: Maui Teens who are Obese

Current Value:

County: Maui Teens who are Obese

13.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.9%), Maui has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3%), Maui has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens who are Overweight

Current Value:
13.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.0%), Maui has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Maui has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (13.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3%).
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
72.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.1%), Maui has a value of 72.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Maui has a value of 72.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (72.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.4%).
Prior Value
(72.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (76.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(76.8%)

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adult Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.5%), Maui has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (12.4%), Maui has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

73.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 73.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (75.5%), Maui has a value of 73.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Maui has a value of 73.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (73.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (80.5%).
Prior Value
(80.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

24.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.7%), Maui has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Maui has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (24.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.6%).
Prior Value
(28.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
29.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Maui has a value of 29.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Maui has a value of 29.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (29.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.5%).
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who Get Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:
43.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.6%), Maui has a value of 43.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(45.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (43.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4%)
<div>SH-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as adults who get an average of at least 7 hours of sleep. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source, but is the inverse, people who get fewer than 7 hours of sleep on average. The HP 2030 target has been adjusted accordingly.</span></div> <div> </div>

County: Maui Adults with Good Physical and Mental Health

Current Value:
47.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.3%), Maui has a value of 47.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.6%), Maui has a value of 47.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.6% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (47.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.9%).
Prior Value
(53.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults with Health Status of Good or Better

Current Value:
87.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.0%), Maui has a value of 87.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (83.0%), Maui has a value of 87.1% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (87.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.1%).
Prior Value
(86.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Maui Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

33.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.2%), Maui has a value of 33.1%.
HI Value
(33.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Maui has a value of 33.1%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (33.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

87.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 87.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (87.7%), Maui has a value of 87.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(87.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Maui has a value of 87.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (87.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (88.6%).
Prior Value
(88.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Maui Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Maui has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Maui Sexual Minority Adults

Current Value:

County: Maui Sexual Minority Adults

6.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Maui has a value of 6.7%.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (6.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1%).
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Sexual or Gender Minority Adults

Current Value:
7.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Maui has a value of 7.3%.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.5%).
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Women's Health

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:
15.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9%), Maui has a value of 15.7%.
HI Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Maui has a value of 15.7%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (15.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.