Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Children Who Drank Sweetened Drinks Yesterday

Current Value:
31.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.9%), Maui has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (31.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.8%).
Prior Value
(21.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.7%)

County: Maui Children Who Eat Fast Food at Least Once Per Week

50.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (55.6%), Maui has a value of 50.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(55.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (50.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.3%).
Prior Value
(37.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (45.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(45.2%)

County: Maui Community Spending on Food

Current Value:
13.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.9%), Maui has a value of 13.2%.
HI Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.6%), Maui has a value of 13.2%.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (13.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Maui Food Environment Index

8.0
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 8.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.4), Maui has a value of 8.0 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Maui has a value of 8.0 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (8.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.1).
Prior Value
(7.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teen Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.8%), Maui has a value of 13.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.3%), Maui has a value of 13.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(22.3% in 2011)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (13.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.7%).
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.4%)

County: Maui Teens Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day

10.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.4%), Maui has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Maui has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1%).
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.4%)

County: Maui Teens Who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages at Least Once Per Day

29.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (29.6%), Maui has a value of 29.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (29.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.5%).
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (26.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(26.3%)

County: Maui Teens Who Drink Sweetened Juice Drinks at Least Once Per Day

11.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.7%), Maui has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (11.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.5%)

County: Maui Teens Who Went Hungry

Current Value:

County: Maui Teens Who Went Hungry

7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Maui has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.6%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Went Hungry

Current Value:
7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.4%), Maui has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.9%)

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
12.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.8%), Maui has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

34.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Maui has a value of 34.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (34.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.3%).
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

41.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (40.8%), Maui has a value of 41.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (41.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.7%).
Prior Value
(53.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
29.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.5%), Maui has a value of 29.5%.
HI Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Maui has a value of 29.5%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.7%), Maui has a value of 11.9%.
HI Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Maui has a value of 11.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.4%), Maui has a value of 6.2%.
HI Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Maui has a value of 6.2%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.9%), Maui has a value of 4.0%.
HI Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Maui has a value of 4.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.6%), Maui has a value of 13.1%.
HI Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Maui has a value of 13.1%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.0%), Maui has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Maui has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Fall-Related ED Visit Rate, Adults 65+

Current Value:
2,579.2
Visits per 100,000 population 65+
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (2,579.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,673.0).
Prior Value
(2,673.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Fall-Related Hospitalization Rate, Adults 65+

Current Value:
620.0
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 65+
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (620.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (602.8).
Prior Value
(602.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
5,592
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (8.2%), Maui has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Maui has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
2,424
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adult Oral Health ED Visits

Current Value:
344.2
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (379.8), Maui has a value of 344.2 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(379.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (344.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (369.8).
Prior Value
(369.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits

Current Value:
461.3
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (560.1), Maui has a value of 461.3 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(560.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (461.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (486.2).
Prior Value
(486.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults 45+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
3.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.6%), Maui has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (3.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.5%).
Prior Value
(4.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.4%)
<div><span>OH-05: Reduce the proportion of adults aged 45 years and over who have lost all their teeth. <br /><br />The national indicator defined exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) which is based on a physical exam and from which data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data for this objective is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Maui Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
6.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.4%), Maui has a value of 6.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.8%), Maui has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (6.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services

35
Adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (35) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14).
Prior Value
(14)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults Who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
70.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.9%), Maui has a value of 70.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(71.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (65.2%), Maui has a value of 70.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (70.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (73.1%).
Prior Value
(73.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

County: Maui Adults with No Recent Dental Visit

Current Value:
29.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (28.1%), Maui has a value of 29.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(28.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.8%), Maui has a value of 29.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (29.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.9%).
Prior Value
(26.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults with One or More Tooth Extractions

Current Value:
40.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.2%), Maui has a value of 40.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.4%), Maui has a value of 40.6% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (40.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.8%).
Prior Value
(43.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults with Substantial Tooth Loss

Current Value:
8.7%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.0%), Maui has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (8.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Children Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services

166
Children
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (166) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (100).
Prior Value
(100)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Dentist Rate

69
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 69 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90), Maui has a value of 69 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (69) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68).
Prior Value
(68)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Medicaid Enrolled Dentists

Current Value:
125
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (125) is greater and better than the previously measured value (123).
Prior Value
(123)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims

46
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (46) is less and worse than the previously measured value (56).
Prior Value
(56)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims

35
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (35) is less and worse than the previously measured value (36).
Prior Value
(36)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Oral Health-Related ED Visits

Current Value:
18.1
Visits per 10,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.8), Maui has a value of 18.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Maui Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist

Current Value:
45.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.6%), Maui has a value of 45.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (45.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.2%).
Prior Value
(49.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance

Current Value:
79.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.5%), Maui has a value of 79.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (79.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.2%).
Prior Value
(84.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (75.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(75.0%)
<div><span>AHS-02: Increase the proportion of people with dental insurance </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey.</span></div>

County: Maui Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims

37.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (37.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (47.9%).
Prior Value
(47.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims

28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (28.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (30.8%).
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year

Current Value:
76.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (79.5%), Maui has a value of 76.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.9%), Maui has a value of 76.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(75.9% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (76.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.1%).
Prior Value
(79.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

County: Maui Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy

48.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.6%), Maui has a value of 48.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.0%), Maui has a value of 48.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(40.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (48.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.3%).
Prior Value
(45.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS

Current Value:
79.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.2%), Maui has a value of 79.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (79.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.9%).
Prior Value
(77.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Knew Oral Health Was Important During Pregnancy

82.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (88.4%), Maui has a value of 82.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (82.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.2%).
Prior Value
(84.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy

Current Value:
83.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (84.9%), Maui has a value of 83.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (83.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.0%).
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.4%), Maui has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy

Current Value:
50.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (47.4%), Maui has a value of 50.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(47.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (50.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.5%).
Prior Value
(50.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year

74.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.2%), Maui has a value of 74.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (74.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.1%).
Prior Value
(79.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist

Current Value:
18.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.6%), Maui has a value of 18.9%.
HI Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Maui has a value of 18.9%.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (18.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.1%).
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Maui Adults with Arthritis

25.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (22.9%), Maui has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(22.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (27.1%), Maui has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (25.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.3%).
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults with CKD Who Have High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
65.3%
(2019, 2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (68.3%), Maui has a value of 65.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(68.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (65.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.5%).
Prior Value
(57.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.8%)
<div><span>CKD-06: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease who have elevated blood pressure<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>

County: Maui Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.4%), Maui has a value of 3.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.5%), Maui has a value of 3.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (3.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.5%).
Prior Value
(2.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8%)
<div> <div>CKD-01: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease.</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on age-adjusted laboratory values. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Maui Adults With Two or More Chronic Conditions

Current Value:
34.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.8%), Maui has a value of 34.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(35.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (34.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.2%).
Prior Value
(36.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (25.0%), Maui has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Maui has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Hepatitis B-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
1.0
Per 100,000 People
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.0), Maui has a value of 1.0.
HI Value
(1.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.4), Maui has a value of 1.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.1).
Prior Value
(1.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (0.16), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.16)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.16), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.16)
<div><span>IID-15: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis B as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Maui Hepatitis C-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
3.1
Per 100,000 People
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.3), Maui has a value of 3.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.3 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.2), Maui has a value of 3.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (3.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.2).
Prior Value
(3.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.44), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.44)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.44), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.44)
<div><span>IID-16: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis C as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Maui Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.0%), Maui has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Maui has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (23.0%), Maui has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Maui has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (25.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
89.6%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 89.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (91.7%), Maui has a value of 89.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Maui has a value of 89.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (89.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (95.0%).
Prior Value
(95.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Maui Access to Parks

47.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.6%), Maui has a value of 47.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (47.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (14.7%).
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults Who Are Sedentary

Current Value:
20.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Maui has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.5%), Maui has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (20.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
<div> <div>PA-01: Reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on performing 10 minutes of physical activity. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

Current Value:
17.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.8%), Maui has a value of 17.3%.
HI Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Maui has a value of 17.3%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (17.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.2%).
Prior Value
(17.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Current Value:
70.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.7%), Maui has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Maui has a value of 70.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (70.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.0%).
Prior Value
(60.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

26.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.8%), Maui has a value of 26.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Maui has a value of 26.7% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (26.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)

County: Maui Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

62.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (56.0%), Maui has a value of 62.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Maui has a value of 62.2% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (62.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.2%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

41.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.3%), Maui has a value of 41.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (32.1%), Maui has a value of 41.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (41.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.3%).
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (40.3%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)

County: Maui Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

37.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Maui has a value of 37.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Maui has a value of 37.7% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (37.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.5%).
Prior Value
(37.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)

County: Maui Adults Who Regularly Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood

28.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.2%), Maui has a value of 28.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(27.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (28.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (28.2%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood

54.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (55.3%), Maui has a value of 54.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (54.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.7%).
Prior Value
(58.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (60.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(60.3%)

County: Maui Adults Whose Neighborhood Supports Physical Activity

50.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (66.6%), Maui has a value of 50.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(66.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (50.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.8%).
Prior Value
(59.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (74.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(74.4%)

County: Maui Internet Usage

Current Value:

County: Maui Internet Usage

91.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Maui has a value of 91.8%.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.0%), Maui has a value of 91.8%.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (91.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (82.9%).
Prior Value
(82.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.2%), Maui has a value of 10.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Maui has a value of 10.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(39.0%)

County: Maui Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety

10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.5%), Maui has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.6%)

County: Maui Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

Current Value:
45.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.3%), Maui has a value of 45.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (45.3%), Maui has a value of 45.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (45.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.9%).
Prior Value
(38.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time

31.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.2%), Maui has a value of 31.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (31.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (24.4%).
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (37.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(37.3%)

County: Maui Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.7%), Maui has a value of 18.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (24.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(24.1%)
<div>PA-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. </div>

County: Maui Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (23.1%), Maui has a value of 23.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.9%), Maui has a value of 23.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.5%).
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)

County: Maui Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

46.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.5%), Maui has a value of 46.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(45.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (44.9%), Maui has a value of 46.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (46.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.2%).
Prior Value
(45.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(56.1%)

County: Maui Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School

Current Value:
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.4%), Maui has a value of 10.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)

County: Maui Workers Commuting by Active Transportation

Current Value:
4.6%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.2%), Maui has a value of 4.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.8%).
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.1%)

County: Maui Workers Commuting by Bicycling

Current Value:
0.5%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Maui has a value of 0.5%.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.4%).
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (0.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(0.9%)

County: Maui Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.3%), Maui has a value of 1.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Maui has a value of 1.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
<div> <div>EH-02: Increase trips to work made by mass transit</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(5.3%)

County: Maui Workers Commuting by Walking

Current Value:
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.2%), Maui has a value of 2.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Maui has a value of 2.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.8%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.3%), Maui has a value of 7.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (10.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(10.1%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety

18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.6%), Maui has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (16.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(16.0%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

44.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (43.8%), Maui has a value of 44.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(43.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (44.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.5%).
Prior Value
(47.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Young Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time

41.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.9%), Maui has a value of 41.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (41.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (34.7%).
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (48.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(48.9%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

20.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.0%), Maui has a value of 20.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (20.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.2%).
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

27.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (26.0%), Maui has a value of 27.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (27.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.2%).
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (26.6%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

49.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.0%), Maui has a value of 49.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (49.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.3%).
Prior Value
(48.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (48.8%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(48.8%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School

10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.0%), Maui has a value of 10.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (14.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(14.2%)

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Prevention & Safety

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Physical

Current Value:
14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.9%), Maui has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (8.6%), Maui has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(8.6% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (14.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Sexual

Current Value:
5.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.9%), Maui has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (1.8%), Maui has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(1.8% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (5.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.5%).
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults Who Have Experienced Non-Contact Sexual Abuse

1.1%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.0%), Maui has a value of 1.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Maui Adults Who Have Experienced Rape

Current Value:
4.9%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.1%), Maui has a value of 4.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Maui Adults Who Have Experienced Rape or Attempted Rape

9.1%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.8%), Maui has a value of 9.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Maui Adults Who Have Experienced Sexual Abuse Other Than Rape

1.8%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.0%), Maui has a value of 1.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Maui Adults Who Use Seat Belts in Cars

Current Value:
93.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (93.4%), Maui has a value of 93.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (94.2%), Maui has a value of 93.9% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (93.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.2%).
Prior Value
(92.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Assault-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
282.4
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (282.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (275.7).
Prior Value
(275.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Assault-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
25.5
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (25.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.3).
Prior Value
(19.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Drowning Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Drowning Death Rate

4.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.3), Maui has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.3 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4), Maui has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.2).
Prior Value
(4.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Fall-Related Death Rate 65+

Current Value:
35.6
Deaths per 100,000 population 65+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.3), Maui has a value of 35.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(51.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (69.4), Maui has a value of 35.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(69.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (35.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.5).
Prior Value
(40.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (63.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(63.4)
<div> <div><span>IVP-08:  </span> <span>Reduce fall-related deaths among older adults.</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Maui Firearm-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
4.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.8), Maui has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.6), Maui has a value of 4.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.4).
Prior Value
(4.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
<div> <div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.healthypeople.gov/node/4768/data_details" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span class="bold"><span>IVP-13:  </span></span><span>Reduce firearm-related deaths</span></a></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Maui Homicide Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Homicide Death Rate

1.7
Per 100,000 population
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.5), Maui has a value of 1.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.5 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8), Maui has a value of 1.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.8 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0).
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.5)
<div><span>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Maui Injury Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Injury Death Rate

60.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.9), Maui has a value of 60.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(57.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.0), Maui has a value of 60.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(89.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (60.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.5).
Prior Value
(59.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (63.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(63.1)
<div>IVP-01: Reduce fatal injuries</div> <div><span> </span></div> <div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Maui Injury-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
5,695.3
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (5,695.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (5,733.4).
Prior Value
(5,733.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
321.5
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (321.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (305.2).
Prior Value
(305.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Intentional Self Harm-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
45.8
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (45.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.3).
Prior Value
(37.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Motor Vehicle Collision Death Rate

Current Value:
7.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.9), Maui has a value of 7.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.8), Maui has a value of 7.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.7).
Prior Value
(8.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
<div> <div>IVP-06: Reduce deaths from motor vehicle crashes</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Maui Motor Vehicle-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
52.6
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (52.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (49.6).
Prior Value
(49.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Nonfatal Motor Vehicle-Related Injury Rate

Current Value:
389.6
Injuries per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (389.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (393.3).
Prior Value
(393.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Nonfatal Pedestrian-Related Injury Rate

Current Value:
29.3
Injuries per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (29.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.5).
Prior Value
(20.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Pedalcyclist Death Rate

Current Value:
0.00
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0.00) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.61).
Prior Value
(0.61)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:
26.2%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 26.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Maui has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Maui has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (26.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving

Current Value:
45.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.2%), Maui has a value of 45.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.1%), Maui has a value of 45.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (45.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.3%).
Prior Value
(43.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight

Current Value:
14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.6%), Maui has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.3%), Maui has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (14.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.3%).
Prior Value
(18.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Traumatic Brain Injury-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
732.1
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (732.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (622.5).
Prior Value
(622.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate

58.6
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (58.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (66.4).
Prior Value
(66.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Unintentional Injury Death Rate

Current Value:
37.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.0), Maui has a value of 37.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(38.0 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (64.7), Maui has a value of 37.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(64.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (37.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.1).
Prior Value
(39.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
<div> <div>IVP-03: Reduce unintentional injury deaths</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Maui Unintentional Injury-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
5,023.0
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (5,023.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (5,057.7).
Prior Value
(5,057.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Unintentional Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate

242.7
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (242.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (223.8).
Prior Value
(223.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Unintentional Poisoning-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
77.9
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Maui (77.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (72.2).
Prior Value
(72.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight

Current Value:
16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.5%), Maui has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (16.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adults 45+ with COPD

Current Value:

County: Maui Adults 45+ with COPD

5.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.4%), Maui has a value of 5.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.5%), Maui has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.5% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (5.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in a Car

Current Value:
8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.1%), Maui has a value of 8.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (8.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

County: Maui Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in the Home

8.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.7%), Maui has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (8.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (5.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(5.4%)

County: Maui Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma

Current Value:
6.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.2%), Maui has a value of 6.5%.
HI Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Maui has a value of 6.5%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (6.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (6.4%).
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Maui Adults with COPD

4.4%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.5%), Maui has a value of 4.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.7%), Maui has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Maui has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.4%), Maui has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.5%).
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Asthma Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Asthma Death Rate

1.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.3), Maui has a value of 1.0 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1), Maui has a value of 1.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.7).
Prior Value
(1.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.89), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.89)
<div>RD-01: Reduce asthma deaths </div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Maui Asthma Death Rate 35-64 Yrs

Current Value:
23.2
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 35-64
(2006-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.2), Maui has a value of 23.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.2 in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8), Maui has a value of 23.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.8 in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (23.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.1).
Prior Value
(25.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Asthma Death Rate 65+ Yrs

Current Value:
53.4
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 65+
(2006-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (47.6), Maui has a value of 53.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(47.6 in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.3), Maui has a value of 53.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(29.3 in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (53.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (61.2).
Prior Value
(61.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.0%), Maui has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Maui has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (6.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan (4.9%), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan
(4.9%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>

County: Maui Children with Current Asthma

Current Value:
7.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.2%), Maui has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1%).
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan (10.4%), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan
(10.4%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>

County: Maui COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs

Current Value:
59.4
Deaths per 100,000 population 45+ years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (48.0), Maui has a value of 59.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(48.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (98.6), Maui has a value of 59.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(98.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (59.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (73.0).
Prior Value
(73.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (107.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(107.2)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>RD-05:  </span></span><span>Reduce deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among adults</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Maui COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.0%), Maui has a value of 7.0%.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Maui has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Days with Unsatisfactory Air Quality

Current Value:
0
Days
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11), Maui has a value of 0 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0) is less and better than the previously measured value (4).
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (275), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(275)
<div><span>EH-01: Reduce the number of days people are exposed to unhealthy air <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator is defined differently as it is weighted by score and population and is reported in people-days.  Although the national target is 3,866,365,816 people-days, we chose a target based on the 2020 baseline value for the state, 306 days.  Using the common target-setting method of a 10% improvement, we set the target for Hawaii state at 275 days.</span></div>

County: Maui ED Visits for Asthma among Adults 65+

Current Value:
23.4
Visits per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.5), Maui has a value of 23.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(32.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (23.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.3).
Prior Value
(12.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (26.1), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(26.1)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (40.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div> <div>RD-03: Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined for people ages 5 years and older. Hawaiʻi tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Maui ED Visits for Asthma among Children 0-4

Current Value:
102.1
Visits per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (54.2), Maui has a value of 102.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(54.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (102.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.9).
Prior Value
(79.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (65.7), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(65.7)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (64.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(64.3)
<div> <div><span>RD-02:  </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for children under 5 years with asthma</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data.  The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Maui ED Visits for Asthma: 5-64 yrs

Current Value:
39.0
Visits per 10,000 people 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.6), Maui has a value of 39.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (39.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.8).
Prior Value
(21.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (41.4), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(41.4)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (40.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div> <div><span>RD-03:  </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined for people aged 5 years and older.  Hawaii tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data.  The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Maui Hospitalizations for Asthma 5-64 yrs

Current Value:
0.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0), Maui has a value of 0.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.9).
Prior Value
(0.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (2.4), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(2.4)

County: Maui Hospitalizations for Asthma among Adults 65+

Current Value:
1.2
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.7), Maui has a value of 1.2 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.2).
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (4.8), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(4.8)

County: Maui Hospitalizations for Asthma Among Children 0-4

2.2
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.1), Maui has a value of 2.2 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (2.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.1).
Prior Value
(2.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (6.7), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(6.7)

County: Maui Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Maui Proximity to Highways

7.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.6%), Maui has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui AIDS Diagnosis Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui AIDS Diagnosis Rate

1.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.8), Maui has a value of 1.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2).
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:
315.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (466.1), Maui has a value of 315.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(466.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (481.3), Maui has a value of 315.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(481.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Maui (315.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (415.5).
Prior Value
(415.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:
58.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (102.2), Maui has a value of 58.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(102.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (206.5), Maui has a value of 58.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Maui (58.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (56.7).
Prior Value
(56.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.