Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Smoke-Free Vehicles with Children

Current Value:
1
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
29.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.4%), Honolulu has a value of 29.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Honolulu has a value of 29.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (29.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.5%).
Prior Value
(44.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.3%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

Current Value:
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.6%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (1.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

Current Value:
57.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.8%), Honolulu has a value of 57.8%.
HI Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (49.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(49.5%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

Current Value:
2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.3%), Honolulu has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), Honolulu has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.8%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.9%).
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.8%), Honolulu has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Honolulu has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Honolulu has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors

Current Value:
2.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.5%), Honolulu has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Honolulu has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.1%).
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
1.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Honolulu has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.7%).
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

Current Value:
0.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.9%), Honolulu has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

Current Value:
61.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.5%), Honolulu has a value of 61.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (48.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(48.8%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

Current Value:
1.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.3%), Honolulu has a value of 1.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.1%), Honolulu has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.7%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
1.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.9%), Honolulu has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.1%).
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
5.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Honolulu has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Honolulu has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Happy with Weight

51.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.4%), Honolulu has a value of 51.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Honolulu has a value of 51.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (51.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (58.7%).
Prior Value
(58.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Are Obese

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.9%), Honolulu has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (33.6%), Honolulu has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36%)
<div> <div>NWS-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition is for adults age 20+ and this indicator is for adults 18+. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (22.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(22.8%)

County: Honolulu Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults who are Overweight

33.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.8%), Honolulu has a value of 33.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.2%), Honolulu has a value of 33.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (33.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.6%).
Prior Value
(35.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
37.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.5%), Honolulu has a value of 37.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(37.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.6%), Honolulu has a value of 37.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (37.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (43.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(43.1%)

County: Honolulu Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

Current Value:
44.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Honolulu has a value of 44.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (44.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.2%).
Prior Value
(40.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

County: Honolulu Teens who are Obese

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens who are Obese

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.9%), Honolulu has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3%), Honolulu has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens who are Overweight

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens who are Overweight

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.0%), Honolulu has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Honolulu has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
71.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.1%), Honolulu has a value of 71.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Honolulu has a value of 71.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (71.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.1%).
Prior Value
(68.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (76.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(76.8%)

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adult Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
8.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.5%), Honolulu has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (12.4%), Honolulu has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

76.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 76.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (75.5%), Honolulu has a value of 76.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Honolulu has a value of 76.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (76.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (84.7%).
Prior Value
(84.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

Current Value:
24.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.7%), Honolulu has a value of 24.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Honolulu has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.7%).
Prior Value
(30.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
24.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Get Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:
47.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.6%), Honolulu has a value of 47.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(45.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (47.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.6%).
Prior Value
(40.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4%)
<div>SH-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as adults who get an average of at least 7 hours of sleep. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source, but is the inverse, people who get fewer than 7 hours of sleep on average. The HP 2030 target has been adjusted accordingly.</span></div> <div> </div>

County: Honolulu Adults with Good Physical and Mental Health

Current Value:
51.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.3%), Honolulu has a value of 51.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.6%), Honolulu has a value of 51.1% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.6% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (51.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.1%).
Prior Value
(57.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Health Status of Good or Better

Current Value:
86.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.0%), Honolulu has a value of 86.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (83.0%), Honolulu has a value of 86.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (86.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.5%).
Prior Value
(88.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

Current Value:
32.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.2%), Honolulu has a value of 32.1%.
HI Value
(33.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Honolulu has a value of 32.1%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (32.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

88.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 88.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (87.7%), Honolulu has a value of 88.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(87.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Honolulu has a value of 88.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (88.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Honolulu Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Honolulu has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Women's Health

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

16.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6%.
HI Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.4%).
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Property Crime Perpetrated by Adolescents and Young Adults

726
Arrests per 100,000 people aged 10-24 years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (879), Honolulu has a value of 726 which is lower and better.
US Value
(879 in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (726) is less and better than the previously measured value (750).
Prior Value
(750)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Violent Crime Perpetrated by Adolescents and Young Adults

184
Arrests per 100,000 people aged 10-24 years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (235), Honolulu has a value of 184 which is lower and better.
US Value
(235 in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (184) is less and better than the previously measured value (187).
Prior Value
(187)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Violent Crime Rate

252
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (259), Honolulu has a value of 252 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(259)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (252) is less and better than the previously measured value (280).
Prior Value
(280)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Average Household Size

2.90
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.90), Honolulu has a value of 2.90.
HI Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Honolulu has a value of 2.90.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Female Population

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Female Population

49.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (49.7%), Honolulu has a value of 49.4%.
HI Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Honolulu has a value of 49.4%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (49.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (49.3%).
Prior Value
(49.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Foreign Born Persons

19.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.0%), Honolulu has a value of 19.4%.
HI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Honolulu has a value of 19.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Households

333,700
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Male Population

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Male Population

50.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.3%), Honolulu has a value of 50.6%.
HI Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Honolulu has a value of 50.6%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (50.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (50.7%).
Prior Value
(50.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons with Limited English Proficiency

Current Value:
12.5%
Percent of population 5+
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Honolulu has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

26.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Honolulu has a value of 26.5%.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Honolulu has a value of 26.5%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
0.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.4%), Honolulu has a value of 0.3%.
HI Value
(0.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Honolulu has a value of 0.3%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.3%).
Prior Value
(0.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Asian

42.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.1%), Honolulu has a value of 42.6%.
HI Value
(37.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Honolulu has a value of 42.6%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (42.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (42.5%).
Prior Value
(42.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Black or African American

Current Value:
2.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.2%), Honolulu has a value of 2.8%.
HI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Honolulu has a value of 2.8%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.8%).
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Chinese

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Chinese

22.2%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.0%), Honolulu has a value of 22.2%.
HI Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5%), Honolulu has a value of 22.2%.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Filipino

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Filipino

34.2%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.6%), Honolulu has a value of 34.2%.
HI Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.2%), Honolulu has a value of 34.2%.
US Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
10.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.1%), Honolulu has a value of 10.3%.
HI Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Honolulu has a value of 10.3%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3%).
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Japanese

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Japanese

32.9%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.0%), Honolulu has a value of 32.9%.
HI Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Honolulu has a value of 32.9%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Korean

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Korean

5.8%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.2%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8%.
HI Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

9.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.3%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9%.
HI Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Over Age 65

19.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.4%), Honolulu has a value of 19.6%.
HI Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Honolulu has a value of 19.6%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (19.1%).
Prior Value
(19.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
187,393
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Two or More Races

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Two or More Races

23.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.7%), Honolulu has a value of 23.2%.
HI Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Honolulu has a value of 23.2%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (23.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (23.3%).
Prior Value
(23.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Under Age 18

20.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.6%), Honolulu has a value of 20.5%.
HI Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Honolulu has a value of 20.5%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (20.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population Under Age 5

5.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.5%), Honolulu has a value of 5.6%.
HI Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Honolulu has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population White

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Population White

21.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.2%), Honolulu has a value of 21.2%.
HI Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Honolulu has a value of 21.2%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (21.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.2%).
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
17.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Honolulu has a value of 17.5%.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Honolulu has a value of 17.5%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Sexual Minority Adults

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Sexual Minority Adults

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Honolulu has a value of 6.0%.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Sexual or Gender Minority Adults

Current Value:
6.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Honolulu has a value of 6.4%.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Total Population

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Total Population

989,408
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (989,408) is less  than the previously measured value (994,828).
Prior Value
(994,828)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Veteran Population

9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.5%), Honolulu has a value of 9.2%.
HI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Honolulu has a value of 9.2%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Community / Public Safety

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
24.9%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 24.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (33.5%), Honolulu has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Honolulu has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.3%).
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Motor Vehicle Collision Death Rate

Current Value:
4.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.9), Honolulu has a value of 4.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.8), Honolulu has a value of 4.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (4.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.7).
Prior Value
(4.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
<div> <div>IVP-06: Reduce deaths from motor vehicle crashes</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Honolulu Motor Vehicle-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
34.3
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.3).
Prior Value
(35.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Pedalcyclist Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Pedalcyclist Death Rate

0.10
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0.10) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.20).
Prior Value
(0.20)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
20.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 20.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (21.8%), Honolulu has a value of 20.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Honolulu has a value of 20.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Internet Usage

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Internet Usage

91.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Honolulu has a value of 91.0%.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.0%), Honolulu has a value of 91.0%.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (91.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (84.4%).
Prior Value
(84.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Linguistic Isolation

6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 6.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.5%), Honolulu has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Honolulu has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
35,062
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Social Associations

6.1
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 6.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.5), Honolulu has a value of 6.1 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Honolulu has a value of 6.1 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.1) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6.4).
Prior Value
(6.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
73.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (73.5%), Honolulu has a value of 73.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (73.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.0%).
Prior Value
(79.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
75.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (74.6%), Honolulu has a value of 75.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(74.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (75.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.0%).
Prior Value
(79.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Community Spending on Transportation

Current Value:
17.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4%), Honolulu has a value of 17.3%.
HI Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Honolulu has a value of 17.3%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
2.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (2.8%), Honolulu has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Mean Travel Time to Work

27.4
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 27.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (26.6), Honolulu has a value of 27.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(26.6)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Honolulu has a value of 27.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
43.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 43.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (40.7%), Honolulu has a value of 43.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Honolulu has a value of 43.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (43.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.8%).
Prior Value
(43.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Workers Commuting by Active Transportation

Current Value:
12.7%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.2%), Honolulu has a value of 12.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.1%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.1%)

County: Honolulu Workers Commuting by Bicycling

Current Value:
0.9%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Honolulu has a value of 0.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.9%).
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (0.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(0.9%)

County: Honolulu Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.3%), Honolulu has a value of 5.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Honolulu has a value of 5.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
<div> <div>EH-02: Increase trips to work made by mass transit</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (5.3%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(5.3%)

County: Honolulu Workers Commuting by Walking

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Workers Commuting by Walking

4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.2%), Honolulu has a value of 4.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Honolulu has a value of 4.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.8%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.8%)

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Employer Establishments

20,973
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (20,973) is less  than the previously measured value (21,237).
Prior Value
(21,237)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 58.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (59.0%), Honolulu has a value of 58.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(59.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Honolulu has a value of 58.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
57.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (57.4%), Honolulu has a value of 57.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(57.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Honolulu has a value of 57.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Size of Labor Force

456,998
Persons
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (456,998) is greater and better than the previously measured value (455,413).
Prior Value
(455,413)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Total Employment

311,947
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (311,947) is less  than the previously measured value (364,092).
Prior Value
(364,092)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Total Employment Change

-14.3%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of -14.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (-14.6%), Honolulu has a value of -14.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(-14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Honolulu has a value of -14.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (-14.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-1.3%).
Prior Value
(-1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
2.4%
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (2.9%), Honolulu has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.5%), Honolulu has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force: 25-64

Current Value:
3.5%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.8%), Honolulu has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.8%), Honolulu has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Receive Food Stamps or SNAP

Current Value:
12.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.2%), Honolulu has a value of 12.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Receive Free Food

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Receive Free Food

9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Honolulu has a value of 9.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (12.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(12.9%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Report Food Scarcity

Current Value:
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.1%), Honolulu has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (13.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.8%).
Prior Value
(20.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.9%)

County: Honolulu Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Child Food Insecurity Rate

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 15.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (17.8%), Honolulu has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Honolulu has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.2%).
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Community Spending on Food

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Community Spending on Food

12.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.9%), Honolulu has a value of 12.6%.
HI Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.6%), Honolulu has a value of 12.6%.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

52%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 52% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (49%), Honolulu has a value of 52% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(49%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Honolulu has a value of 52% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (52%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (52%).
Prior Value
(52%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Food Insecurity Rate

9.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (11.9%), Honolulu has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Honolulu has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households Receiving SNAP

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Households Receiving SNAP

9.1%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.4%), Honolulu has a value of 9.1%.
US Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
49.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.0%), Honolulu has a value of 49.8%.
HI Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Honolulu has a value of 49.8%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
15,931
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
22.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 22.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (24.6%), Honolulu has a value of 22.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (22.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.4%).
Prior Value
(27.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (15.1%), Honolulu has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
33.2%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (36.7%), Honolulu has a value of 33.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(36.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Honolulu has a value of 33.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (33.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.1%).
Prior Value
(35.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Went Hungry

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Went Hungry

4.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Honolulu has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.6%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.6%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Went Hungry

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Went Hungry

4.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.4%), Honolulu has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (4.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.9%)

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 3.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.0%), Honolulu has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Honolulu has a value of 3.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households with Children Receiving Assistance

Current Value:
22.4%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.3%), Honolulu has a value of 22.4%.
HI Value
(25.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Honolulu has a value of 22.4%.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Community Spending on Housing

Current Value:
33.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.4%), Honolulu has a value of 33.5%.
HI Value
(33.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Honolulu has a value of 33.5%.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (33.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (33.6%).
Prior Value
(33.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu High Housing Burden

Current Value:

County: Honolulu High Housing Burden

40.5%
Percent of households
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.3%), Honolulu has a value of 40.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (40.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.2%).
Prior Value
(41.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
17.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 17.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (18.0%), Honolulu has a value of 17.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Homelessness Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Homelessness Rate

40.5
Per 10,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.5), Honolulu has a value of 40.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.5 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (40.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.3).
Prior Value
(39.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
12.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (12.2%), Honolulu has a value of 12.2%.
HI Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (1.2%), Honolulu has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Honolulu has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Homeownership

53.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 53.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (53.3%), Honolulu has a value of 53.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(53.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Honolulu has a value of 53.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Housing Units

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Housing Units

373,875
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (373,875) is greater  than the previously measured value (372,612).
Prior Value
(372,612)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Median Household Gross Rent

$1,976
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($1,868), Honolulu has a value of $1,976 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
($1,868)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Honolulu has a value of $1,976 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Median Housing Unit Value

$832,200
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($764,800), Honolulu has a value of $832,200 which is higher and better.
HI Value
($764,800)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Honolulu has a value of $832,200 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$708
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($630), Honolulu has a value of $708 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
($630)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Honolulu has a value of $708 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$2,969
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($2,778), Honolulu has a value of $2,969 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
($2,778)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Honolulu has a value of $2,969 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

41.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 41.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (41.3%), Honolulu has a value of 41.3%.
HI Value
(41.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Honolulu has a value of 41.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (41.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.6%).
Prior Value
(40.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
<div> <div>SDOH-04:  Reduce the proportion of families that spend more than 30 percent of income on housing</div> <div> </div> <div>The data source for the national indicator is the American Housing Survey from which state-level data cannot be obtained. The state data source is the American Community Survey which is comparable to the national data source but the denominator is mortgaged owners rather than households. </div> </div>

County: Honolulu Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Overcrowded Households

8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.5%), Honolulu has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Honolulu has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

57.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 57.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (55.8%), Honolulu has a value of 57.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(55.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Honolulu has a value of 57.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
<div>SDOH-04:  Reduce the proportion of families that spend more than 30 percent of income on housing</div> <div> </div> <div>The data source for the national indicator is the American Housing Survey from which state-level data cannot be obtained. The state data source is the American Community Survey which is comparable to the national data source but the denominator is renter-occupied housing units rather than households. </div> <div> </div>

County: Honolulu Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Severe Housing Problems

26.1%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Honolulu has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Honolulu has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (26.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.9%).
Prior Value
(26.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
4.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Honolulu has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (4.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.8%).
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Gender Pay Gap

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Gender Pay Gap

$0.78
Cents on the dollar
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($0.76), Honolulu has a value of $0.78 which is higher and better.
HI Value
($0.76)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($0.73), Honolulu has a value of $0.78 which is higher and better.
US Value
($0.73)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu ($0.78) is greater and better than the previously measured value ($0.73).
Prior Value
($0.73)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

59.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (56.0%), Honolulu has a value of 59.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (59.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (61.1%).
Prior Value
(61.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (29.0%), Honolulu has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(29.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (27.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.1%).
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Income Inequality

0.439
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 0.439 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (0.447), Honolulu has a value of 0.439 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(0.447)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Honolulu has a value of 0.439 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Median Household Income

$99,816
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of $99,816 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value ($94,814), Honolulu has a value of $99,816 which is higher and better.
HI Value
($94,814)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Honolulu has a value of $99,816 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Per Capita Income

$44,026
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of $44,026 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value ($42,683), Honolulu has a value of $44,026 which is higher and better.
HI Value
($42,683)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Honolulu has a value of $44,026 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens

Current Value:
34.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 34.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (34.4%), Honolulu has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6%), Honolulu has a value of 34.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.2%).
Prior Value
(44.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Households that Used Check Cashing, Cash Advance, or Title Loan Shops

2.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.9%), Honolulu has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.2%), Honolulu has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Households with a 401k Plan

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Households with a 401k Plan

46.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.1%), Honolulu has a value of 46.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.1%), Honolulu has a value of 46.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (46.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (46.3%).
Prior Value
(46.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Households with a Savings Account

Current Value:
75.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 75.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (75.3%), Honolulu has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.1%), Honolulu has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (75.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (76.3%).
Prior Value
(76.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Households with Student Loan Debt

Current Value:
11.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.4%), Honolulu has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.3%), Honolulu has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Children Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (29.9%), Honolulu has a value of 28.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5%), Honolulu has a value of 28.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (28.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.7%).
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (12.4%), Honolulu has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Honolulu has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
16.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 16.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 825 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (17.6%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.5%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.0%), Honolulu has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu People 65+ Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (20.5%), Honolulu has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Honolulu has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (20.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.2%).
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (8.2%), Honolulu has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Honolulu has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
14,434
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 22.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (23.1%), Honolulu has a value of 22.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.4%), Honolulu has a value of 22.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (22.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.5%).
Prior Value
(21.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.