Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Older Adults
Health / Older Adults
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Honolulu Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Honolulu Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
16.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Honolulu Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Fall-Related ED Visit Rate, Adults 65+
County: Honolulu Fall-Related ED Visit Rate, Adults 65+
3,873.4
Visits per 100,000 population 65+
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3,624.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Fall-Related Hospitalization Rate, Adults 65+
County: Honolulu Fall-Related Hospitalization Rate, Adults 65+
708.6
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 65+
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(705.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Adult Oral Health ED Visits
County: Honolulu Adult Oral Health ED Visits
311.3
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(379.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(33.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits
County: Honolulu Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits
499.7
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(560.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(502.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults 45+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Honolulu Adults 45+ with Total Tooth Loss
3.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.4%)
<div><span>OH-05: Reduce the proportion of adults aged 45 years and over who have lost all their teeth. <br /><br />The national indicator defined exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) which is based on a physical exam and from which data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data for this objective is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Honolulu Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
4.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services
County: Honolulu Adults Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services
0
Adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited a Dentist
County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited a Dentist
73.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(71.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(76.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Adults with No Recent Dental Visit
County: Honolulu Adults with No Recent Dental Visit
26.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(28.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults with One or More Tooth Extractions
County: Honolulu Adults with One or More Tooth Extractions
36.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults with Substantial Tooth Loss
County: Honolulu Adults with Substantial Tooth Loss
7.0%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Children Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services
County: Honolulu Children Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services
0
Children
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Dentist Rate
County: Honolulu Dentist Rate
101
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(90)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(97)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists
County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists
403
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(402)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims
County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims
269
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(279)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims
County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims
182
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(169)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Oral Health-Related ED Visits
County: Honolulu Oral Health-Related ED Visits
14.1
Visits per 10,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Honolulu Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist
County: Honolulu Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist
45.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(45.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance
County: Honolulu Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance
84.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(81.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(83.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(75.0%)
<div><span>AHS-02: Increase the proportion of people with dental insurance </span></div>
<div><span></span></div>
<div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims
County: Honolulu Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims
66.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(72.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims
County: Honolulu Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims
45.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
County: Honolulu Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
80.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(75.9% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy
County: Honolulu Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy
45.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(44.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(40.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS
County: Honolulu Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS
83.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(82.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Women Who Knew Oral Health Was Important During Pregnancy
County: Honolulu Women Who Knew Oral Health Was Important During Pregnancy
91.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(90.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy
County: Honolulu Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy
85.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(84.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy
County: Honolulu Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy
10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy
County: Honolulu Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy
48.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(47.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(48.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
79.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(80.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
Health / Other Conditions
Health / Other Conditions
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
19.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults with Arthritis
County: Honolulu Adults with Arthritis
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(22.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults with CKD Who Have High Blood Pressure
County: Honolulu Adults with CKD Who Have High Blood Pressure
70.8%
(2019, 2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(68.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(69.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(42.8%)
<div><span>CKD-06: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease who have elevated blood pressure<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>
County: Honolulu Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Honolulu Adults with Kidney Disease
3.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8%)
<div>
<div>CKD-01: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on age-adjusted laboratory values. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
County: Honolulu Adults With Two or More Chronic Conditions
County: Honolulu Adults With Two or More Chronic Conditions
34.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(35.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(35.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Honolulu Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Hepatitis B-Related Death Rate
County: Honolulu Hepatitis B-Related Death Rate
1.2
Per 100,000 People
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(0.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.16)
HP 2030 Target
(0.16)
<div><span>IID-15: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis B as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Hepatitis C-Related Death Rate
County: Honolulu Hepatitis C-Related Death Rate
2.5
Per 100,000 People
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.3 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(3.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.44)
HP 2030 Target
(1.44)
<div><span>IID-16: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis C as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Honolulu Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Honolulu Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Health / Physical Activity
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Adults Who Are Sedentary
County: Honolulu Adults Who Are Sedentary
21.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(20.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
<div>
<div>PA-01: Reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on performing 10 minutes of physical activity. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
PAN Plan Target
(18.2%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
County: Honolulu Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
20.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
County: Honolulu Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
72.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines
County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines
24.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(24.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
54.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(55.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
34.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines
38.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Regularly Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood
County: Honolulu Adults Who Regularly Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood
27.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(27.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(28.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(28.2%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood
County: Honolulu Adults Who Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood
57.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(57.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(60.3%)
County: Honolulu Adults Whose Neighborhood Supports Physical Activity
County: Honolulu Adults Whose Neighborhood Supports Physical Activity
78.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(66.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(79.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(74.4%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
County: Honolulu Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(39.0%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
County: Honolulu Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
9.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(9.6%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
County: Honolulu Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
41.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
34.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(37.3%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(24.1%)
<div>PA-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. </div>
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
22.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
45.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(45.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(56.1%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
County: Honolulu Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
10.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(10.1%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(16.0%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
44.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(43.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
46.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(32.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(48.9%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
19.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
45.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(41.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(48.8%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(14.2%)
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Physical
County: Honolulu Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Physical
10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(8.6% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Sexual
County: Honolulu Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Sexual
5.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(1.8% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Experienced Non-Contact Sexual Abuse
County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Experienced Non-Contact Sexual Abuse
0.9%
(2013)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Experienced Rape
County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Experienced Rape
2.8%
(2013)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Experienced Rape or Attempted Rape
County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Experienced Rape or Attempted Rape
5.2%
(2013)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Experienced Sexual Abuse Other Than Rape
County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Experienced Sexual Abuse Other Than Rape
0.8%
(2013)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Seat Belts in Cars
County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Seat Belts in Cars
93.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(92.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Assault-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Honolulu Assault-Related ED Visit Rate
316.5
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(300.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Assault-Related Hospitalization Rate
County: Honolulu Assault-Related Hospitalization Rate
24.1
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(20.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Drowning Death Rate
County: Honolulu Drowning Death Rate
2.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.3 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Fall-Related Death Rate 65+
County: Honolulu Fall-Related Death Rate 65+
59.2
Deaths per 100,000 population 65+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(51.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(69.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(59.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(63.4)
<div>
<div><span>IVP-08: </span> <span>Reduce fall-related deaths among older adults.</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>
</div>
County: Honolulu Firearm-Related Death Rate
County: Honolulu Firearm-Related Death Rate
3.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(14.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
<div>
<div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.healthypeople.gov/node/4768/data_details" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span class="bold"><span>IVP-13: </span></span><span>Reduce firearm-related deaths</span></a></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>
</div>
County: Honolulu Firearm-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Honolulu Firearm-Related ED Visit Rate
4.8
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Homicide Death Rate
County: Honolulu Homicide Death Rate
2.5
Per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.5 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(5.8 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.5)
<div><span>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Injury Death Rate
County: Honolulu Injury Death Rate
50.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(57.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(89.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(63.1)
<div>IVP-01: Reduce fatal injuries</div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div>
<p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p>
</div>
County: Honolulu Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Honolulu Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
6,573.2
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6,263.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
County: Honolulu Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
285.9
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(272.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Intentional Self Harm-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Honolulu Intentional Self Harm-Related ED Visit Rate
38.5
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(53.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Nonfatal Motor Vehicle-Related Injury Rate
County: Honolulu Nonfatal Motor Vehicle-Related Injury Rate
365.7
Injuries per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(364.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Nonfatal Pedestrian-Related Injury Rate
County: Honolulu Nonfatal Pedestrian-Related Injury Rate
25.0
Injuries per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(22.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Pedestrian Death Rate
County: Honolulu Pedestrian Death Rate
1.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.4 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(1.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving
County: Honolulu Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving
35.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(36.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
County: Honolulu Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Traumatic Brain Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Honolulu Traumatic Brain Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
707.2
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(720.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
County: Honolulu Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
68.4
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(63.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Unintentional Injury Death Rate
County: Honolulu Unintentional Injury Death Rate
36.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.0 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(64.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
<div>
<div>IVP-03: Reduce unintentional injury deaths</div>
<div> </div>
<p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p>
</div>
County: Honolulu Unintentional Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Honolulu Unintentional Injury-Related ED Visit Rate
5,274.5
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5,234.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Unintentional Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
County: Honolulu Unintentional Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate
228.2
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(218.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Unintentional Poisoning-Related ED Visit Rate
County: Honolulu Unintentional Poisoning-Related ED Visit Rate
84.9
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(81.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(18.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Health / Respiratory Diseases
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Adults 45+ with COPD
County: Honolulu Adults 45+ with COPD
5.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.5% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in a Car
County: Honolulu Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in a Car
6.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)
County: Honolulu Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in the Home
County: Honolulu Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in the Home
7.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(5.4%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
County: Honolulu Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
6.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults with COPD
County: Honolulu Adults with COPD
3.3%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults with Current Asthma
County: Honolulu Adults with Current Asthma
8.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Asthma Death Rate
County: Honolulu Asthma Death Rate
1.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(0.89)
<div>RD-01: Reduce asthma deaths </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>
County: Honolulu Asthma Death Rate 35-64 Yrs
County: Honolulu Asthma Death Rate 35-64 Yrs
17.6
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 35-64
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(28.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Asthma Death Rate 65+ Yrs
County: Honolulu Asthma Death Rate 65+ Yrs
54.2
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 65+
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(47.6)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(29.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(53.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Asthma Death Rate <35 Yrs
County: Honolulu Asthma Death Rate <35 Yrs
2.2
Deaths per 1,000,000 population <35
(2006-2015)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Honolulu Asthma: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan
(4.9%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>
County: Honolulu Children with Current Asthma
County: Honolulu Children with Current Asthma
9.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan
(10.4%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>
County: Honolulu COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs
County: Honolulu COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs
41.3
Deaths per 100,000 population 45+ years
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(48.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(98.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(107.2)
<div>
<div><span class="bold"><span>RD-05: </span></span><span>Reduce deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among adults</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
</div>
County: Honolulu COPD: Medicare Population
County: Honolulu COPD: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu ED Visits for Asthma among Adults 65+
County: Honolulu ED Visits for Asthma among Adults 65+
32.7
Visits per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(32.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(26.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(26.1)
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div>
<div>RD-03: Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined for people ages 5 years and older. Hawaiʻi tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
County: Honolulu ED Visits for Asthma among Children 0-4
County: Honolulu ED Visits for Asthma among Children 0-4
39.8
Visits per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(54.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(23.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(65.7)
HP 2030 Target
(64.3)
<div>
<div><span>RD-02: </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for children under 5 years with asthma</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
County: Honolulu ED Visits for Asthma: 5-64 yrs
County: Honolulu ED Visits for Asthma: 5-64 yrs
31.8
Visits per 10,000 people 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(24.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(41.4)
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div>
<div><span>RD-03: </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined for people aged 5 years and older. Hawaii tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
County: Honolulu Hospitalizations for Asthma 5-64 yrs
County: Honolulu Hospitalizations for Asthma 5-64 yrs
1.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(1.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(2.4)
County: Honolulu Hospitalizations for Asthma among Adults 65+
County: Honolulu Hospitalizations for Asthma among Adults 65+
1.5
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(1.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(4.8)
County: Honolulu Hospitalizations for Asthma Among Children 0-4
County: Honolulu Hospitalizations for Asthma Among Children 0-4
9.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(4.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma Plan Target
(6.7)
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu AIDS Diagnosis Rate
County: Honolulu AIDS Diagnosis Rate
0.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(0.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Honolulu Chlamydia Incidence Rate
532.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(466.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(481.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(656.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Honolulu Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
117.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(102.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(124.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Honolulu Syphilis Incidence Rate
6.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Prior Value
(7.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance
County: Honolulu Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance
95.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(97.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(96.0%)
County: Honolulu Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP
County: Honolulu Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP
69.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(69.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(75.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(90.7%)
County: Honolulu Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP
County: Honolulu Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP
37.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(37.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(54.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(61%)
County: Honolulu Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline
County: Honolulu Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline
71.6
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(71.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(72.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(81)
County: Honolulu Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke
County: Honolulu Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke
8.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(17.3%)
<div>TU-19: Reduce the proportion of people who donʻt smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke</div>
<div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span>The national indicator is defined differently as the proportion of children, nonsmoking adolescents, and nonsmoking adults aged 3 years and over who had a serum cotinine level greater than or equal to 0.05 ng/mL and less than or equal to 10 ng/ml. </span>The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported data and only includes adults ages 18+.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in Multi-Unit Homes
County: Honolulu Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in Multi-Unit Homes
35.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(38.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(29.6%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Attempted to Quit Smoking Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Adults Who Attempted to Quit Smoking Cigarettes
45.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(45.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(51.8% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(65.7%)
<div><span>TU-11: Increase past-year attempts to quit smoking in adults<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adults who quit in the past year. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(65.7%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
County: Honolulu Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
1.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device
County: Honolulu Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(24.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help
County: Honolulu Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help
15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(43.8%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Recently Quit Smoking Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Adults Who Recently Quit Smoking Cigarettes
9.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.6%)
<div>TU-14: Increase successful quit attempts in adults who smoke</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
<div> </div>
County: Honolulu Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes
9.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>
TPC Plan Target
(6.1%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
71.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(63.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(75.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(52.7%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device
County: Honolulu Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(2.3%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Smokeless Tobacco
County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Smokeless Tobacco
2.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(0.8%)
County: Honolulu Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Honolulu Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
5.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Honolulu Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: Honolulu Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
0.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults Who Drink Excessively
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults Who Drink Excessively
14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(9.0%)
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Depression
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Depression
17.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(9.5%)
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Educational Attainment
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Educational Attainment
28.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(9.8%)
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Income
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Income
19.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(8.2%)
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Poor Mental Health
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Poor Mental Health
21.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(9.3%)
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among LGBT Adults
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among LGBT Adults
11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(8.1%)
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Native Hawaiian Adults
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Native Hawaiian Adults
17.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(8.3%)
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Unemployed Adults
County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Unemployed Adults
17.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(12.0%)
County: Honolulu Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Honolulu Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
1.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
HI Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Illegal Tobacco Sales
County: Honolulu Illegal Tobacco Sales
4.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
US Value
(9.6% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Prior Value
(4.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)
County: Honolulu Smoke-Free Homes
County: Honolulu Smoke-Free Homes
93.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(93.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(90.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
