Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Binge Drink

18.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (16.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (25.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(25.4%)
<div>SU-10: Reduce the proportion of people aged 21 years and over who engaged in binge drinking in the past month <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator includes persons aged 21 and over.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source but includes adults 18 years and older.</div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Alcohol

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Alcohol

50.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (53.4%), Hawaii has a value of 50.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(53.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (50.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.1%).
Prior Value
(49.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink and Drive

Current Value:
2.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (2.3%), Hawaii has a value of 2.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.1%).
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Excessively

Current Value:
19.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Heavily

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Heavily

8.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.8%), Hawaii has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use Marijuana

11.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Have Had Cancer

Current Value:
6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.5%), Hawaii has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (5.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(5.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
4.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.6%), Hawaii has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.5%).
Prior Value
(4.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

State: Hawaii Adults with Hepatitis B Vaccines

Current Value:
37.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.8%).
Prior Value
(37.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (44.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(44.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults with Sunburns, past year

Current Value:
32.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.8%).
Prior Value
(29.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (33.1%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(33.1%)

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

78.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.3%), Hawaii has a value of 78.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (78.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.7%).
Prior Value
(83.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (92.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(92.1%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div> <div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors Who Have Obesity

Current Value:
21.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.6%).
Prior Value
(20.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (19.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(19.5%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors Who Smoke Cigarettes or E-cigarettes

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.6%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.6%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with a Survivorship Care Plan

Current Value:
27.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (27.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.1%).
Prior Value
(32.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (30.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(30.5%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with a Written Treatment Summary

52.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (52.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (59.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(59.7%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with an Advance Directive

Current Value:
65.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (65.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (63.5%).
Prior Value
(63.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (70.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(70.5%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with Instructions for Follow Up Care

81.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.6%).
Prior Value
(76.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (82.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(82.8%)

State: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Screening

Current Value:
80.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (87.1%).
Prior Value
(87.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(84.3%)
<div> <div>C-09: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer.<br /> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Screening

Current Value:
77.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (74.2%), Hawaii has a value of 77.1% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.1%).
Prior Value
(75.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.8%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (74.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div> <div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
64.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (64.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.1%).
Prior Value
(69.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (9.7%), Hawaii has a value of 7.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (12.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(12.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (7.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(7.5%)
<div><span>C-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for lung cancer </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in differently as adults 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit in the last 15 years. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

Current Value:
25.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (31.8%), Hawaii has a value of 25.4% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(31.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.5%).
Prior Value
(24.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (27.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(27.9%)

State: Hawaii Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor

Current Value:
14.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6%).
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (16.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(16.2%)

State: Hawaii Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test

Current Value:
76.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (77.7%), Hawaii has a value of 76.1% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (76.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (82.7%).
Prior Value
(82.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (83.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(83.7%)

State: Hawaii Women 30-65 Who Had an HPV Test

Current Value:
44.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.7%).
Prior Value
(47.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (49.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(49.3%)

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults with a Diabetes Self-Management Plan

Current Value:
62.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (62.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (64.3%).
Prior Value
(64.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (69.8%), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(69.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults with Diabetes

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.6%), Hawaii has a value of 11.7% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Prediabetes

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults with Prediabetes

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii High Risk Adults Tested for Diabetes

Current Value:
86.9
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (86.9) is greater and better than the previously measured value (53.2).
Prior Value
(53.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (67.5), the target has  been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(67.5)

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults with a Cognitive Disability

Current Value:
9.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with a Disability

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults with a Disability

24.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (27.6%), Hawaii has a value of 24.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(27.6% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5%).
Prior Value
(22.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with a Self-Care Disability

Current Value:
2.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.5%), Hawaii has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with a Vision Disability

Current Value:
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (5.3%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Activity Limitations due to Arthritis

35.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.4%), Hawaii has a value of 35.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (35.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.1%).
Prior Value
(33.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (38.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(38.7%)
<div><span>A-02:  Reduce the proportion of adults with arthritis whose arthritis limits their activities<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults with an Ambulatory Disability

Current Value:
10.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.3%), Hawaii has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.7%).
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with an Independent Living Disability

Current Value:
5.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Work Limitations due to Arthritis

Current Value:
27.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.9%), Hawaii has a value of 27.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (27.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.3%).
Prior Value
(31.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (34.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(34.7%)
<div><span>A-03:  Reduce the proportion of adults with arthritis whose arthritis limits their work<br /> <br />The national indicator is limited to adults aged 18-64.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Family Planning

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

50.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (50.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.3%).
Prior Value
(55.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.1%)
<div><span>FP-10: Increase the proportion of women at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator only includes most effective or moderately effective methods of contraception and is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Did Not See a Doctor Due to Cost

Current Value:
5.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.1%), Hawaii has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
76.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (75.5%), Hawaii has a value of 76.8% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(75.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (76.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.8%).
Prior Value
(74.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
88.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.8%), Hawaii has a value of 88.4% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (88.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.1%).
Prior Value
(90.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
2.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.1%), Hawaii has a value of 2.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Experienced a Heart Attack

Current Value:
3.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (4.5%), Hawaii has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
2.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.4%), Hawaii has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
3.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (4.4%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

79.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (79.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (74.4%).
Prior Value
(74.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HDS Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HDS Plan Target
(82.6%)

State: Hawaii Adults with a Cholesterol Test, past 5 years

Current Value:
82.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.3%), Hawaii has a value of 82.7% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (82.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.1%).
Prior Value
(85.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with High Blood Cholesterol

Current Value:
34.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.6%), Hawaii has a value of 34.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.9%).
Prior Value
(29.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
29.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.1%), Hawaii has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (29.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.7%).
Prior Value
(30.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.6%)
<div>HDS-04: Reduce the proportion of adults with high blood pressure<br /> <br />The national indicator excludes pregnant women. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div>

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Influenza Vaccination Rate

Current Value:
47.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (46.8%).
Prior Value
(46.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (70.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(70.0%)
<div> <div>IID-09: Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national objective includes all persons 6 months and older. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, which does not provide state-level data for Hawaiʻi. The state data sources are the National Immunization Survey for children 6 months to 17 years and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults 18 years and older, which are comparable to the national source. </div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adult Tetanus Vaccination

Current Value:
60.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (71.3%), Hawaii has a value of 60.2% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(71.3% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (60.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (66.8%).
Prior Value
(66.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults 18-26 with HPV Vaccines

Current Value:
32.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.4%).
Prior Value
(37.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (34.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(34.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults Tested for HIV in Past 2 Years

Current Value:
44.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii HIV Testing Among Adults

Current Value:

State: Hawaii HIV Testing Among Adults

30.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (36.3%), Hawaii has a value of 30.5% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.6%).
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Influenza Vaccination Rate 18-64 yrs

Current Value:
44.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.6%).
Prior Value
(40.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (70.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(70.0%)
<div> <div>IID-09: Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national objective includes all persons 6 months and older. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, which does not provide state-level data for Hawaiʻi. The state data source for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source. </div> </div>

State: Hawaii Influenza Vaccination Rate 65+

Current Value:
70.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (67.7%), Hawaii has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (70.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (65.6%).
Prior Value
(65.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (70.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(70.0%)
<div> <div>IID-09: Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national objective includes all persons 6 months and older. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, which does not provide state-level data for Hawaiʻi. The state data source for adults is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source. </div> </div>

State: Hawaii Pneumonia Vaccination Rate 65+

Current Value:
62.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (71.4%), Hawaii has a value of 62.0% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(71.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (62.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.4%).
Prior Value
(60.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Recent HIV Testing Among Young Adults

Current Value:
73.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (73.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.7%).
Prior Value
(77.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (15.7%), Hawaii has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (21.6%), Hawaii has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Grew Up with Drug Use in Household

Current Value:
11.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Grew Up with Mental Illness in Household

13.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Grew Up with Problem Drinking in Household

19.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.2%).
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults with 4+ Adverse Childhood Experiences

Current Value:
15.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.5%).
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (19.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(19.4%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (10.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(10.4%)

State: Hawaii Adults with Low Fruit Consumption

Current Value:
42.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.0%), Hawaii has a value of 42.5% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.3%).
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Low Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
21.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (19.8%), Hawaii has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(19.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Children Who Drank Soda with Sugar Yesterday

Current Value:
19.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.4%).
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.3%)

State: Hawaii Children Who Drank Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Yesterday

42.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27.2%).
Prior Value
(27.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (25.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(25.2%)

State: Hawaii Children Who Drank Sweetened Drinks Yesterday

Current Value:
33.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.6%).
Prior Value
(20.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.7%)

State: Hawaii Children Who Eat Fast Food at Least Once Per Week

55.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (55.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.7%).
Prior Value
(49.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (45.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(45.2%)

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

53.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (53.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.8%).
Prior Value
(42.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

58.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (58.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.8%).
Prior Value
(40.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults 45+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
3.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.4%)
<div><span>OH-05: Reduce the proportion of adults aged 45 years and over who have lost all their teeth. <br /><br />The national indicator defined exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) which is based on a physical exam and from which data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data for this objective is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
5.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
71.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (65.2%), Hawaii has a value of 71.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.7%).
Prior Value
(74.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults with No Recent Dental Visit

Current Value:
28.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.8%), Hawaii has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.3%).
Prior Value
(25.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with One or More Tooth Extractions

Current Value:
38.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.4%), Hawaii has a value of 38.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Substantial Tooth Loss

Current Value:
8.0%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.4%).
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults with Arthritis

22.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (27.1%), Hawaii has a value of 22.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.4%).
Prior Value
(20.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with CKD Who Have High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
68.3%
(2019, 2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (68.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.1%).
Prior Value
(68.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.8%)
<div><span>CKD-06: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease who have elevated blood pressure<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.5%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.8%).
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8%)
<div> <div>CKD-01: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease.</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on age-adjusted laboratory values. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults With Two or More Chronic Conditions

Current Value:
35.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (35.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.6%).
Prior Value
(36.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary

21.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.5%), Hawaii has a value of 21.3% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
<div> <div>PA-01: Reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on performing 10 minutes of physical activity. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

24.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Hawaii has a value of 24.8% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.6%).
Prior Value
(24.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

56.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 56.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (56.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

36.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 36.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.4%).
Prior Value
(36.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (40.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

37.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Hawaii has a value of 37.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Regularly Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood

27.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (27.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.9%).
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (28.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(28.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood

55.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (55.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.1%).
Prior Value
(56.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (60.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(60.3%)

State: Hawaii Adults Whose Neighborhood Supports Physical Activity

66.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (66.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.3%).
Prior Value
(68.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (74.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(74.4%)

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Prevention & Safety

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Physical

Current Value:
11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (8.6%), Hawaii has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(8.6% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adult Intimate Partner Violence- Sexual

Current Value:
5.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 5.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(1.8% in 2007)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.6%).
Prior Value
(3.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use Seat Belts in Cars

Current Value:
93.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (94.2%), Hawaii has a value of 93.4% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.8%).
Prior Value
(92.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults 45+ with COPD

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults 45+ with COPD

5.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.5%), Hawaii has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.5% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in a Car

Current Value:
7.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in the Home

Current Value:
7.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (5.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(5.4%)

State: Hawaii Adults with COPD

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults with COPD

3.5%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
9.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Children with Current Asthma

Current Value:
9.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1%).
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan (10.4%), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan
(10.4%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance

Current Value:
94.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.5%).
Prior Value
(96.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (96.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(96.0%)

State: Hawaii Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP

Current Value:
69.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (69.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(90.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP

Current Value:
37.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (54.9%).
Prior Value
(54.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (61%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(61%)

State: Hawaii Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline

Current Value:
71.3
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.1).
Prior Value
(72.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (81), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(81)

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke

Current Value:
8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (17.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(17.3%)
<div>TU-19: Reduce the proportion of people who donʻt smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke</div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span></span></span></div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span>The national indicator is defined differently as the proportion of children, nonsmoking adolescents, and nonsmoking adults aged 3 years and over who had a serum cotinine level greater than or equal to 0.05 ng/mL and less than or equal to 10 ng/ml. </span>The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported data and only includes adults ages 18+.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke in Multi-Unit Homes

34.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.8%).
Prior Value
(38.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (29.6%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(29.6%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Attempted to Quit Smoking Cigarettes

45.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (51.8%), Hawaii has a value of 45.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(51.8% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.3%).
Prior Value
(45.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.7%)
<div><span>TU-11: Increase past-year attempts to quit smoking in adults<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adults who quit in the past year.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (65.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(65.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device

34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (28.0%), Hawaii has a value of 34.0% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.7%).
Prior Value
(24.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help

Current Value:
14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (43.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(43.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Recently Quit Smoking Cigarettes

Current Value:
9.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.6%)
<div>TU-14: Increase successful quit attempts in adults who smoke</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.5%), Hawaii has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(6.1%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
63.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (63.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.5%).
Prior Value
(70.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (52.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(52.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device

Current Value:
8.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (2.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(2.3%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Use Smokeless Tobacco

Current Value:
2.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.4%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.8%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults Who Drink Excessively

16.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.0%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Depression

Current Value:
17.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.7%).
Prior Value
(19.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.5%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Educational Attainment

24.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7%).
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.8%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Income

Current Value:
20.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.3%).
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.2%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Poor Mental Health

20.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.5%).
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.3%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among LGBT Adults

Current Value:
13.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.1%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Native Hawaiian Adults

Current Value:
17.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.3%)

State: Hawaii Cigarette Smoking among Unemployed Adults

Current Value:
19.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (12.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(12.0%)

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Homes

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Smoke-Free Homes

93.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (90.7%).
Prior Value
(90.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 25.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36%)
<div> <div>NWS-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition is for adults age 20+ and this indicator is for adults 18+. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (22.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(22.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:
33.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.2%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.3%).
Prior Value
(35.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
37.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.6%), Hawaii has a value of 37.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.3%).
Prior Value
(37.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (43.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(43.1%)

State: Hawaii Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

42.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (37.8%).
Prior Value
(37.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
9.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
25.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Get Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:
45.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.4%).
Prior Value
(39.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4%)
<div>SH-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as adults who get an average of at least 7 hours of sleep. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source, but is the inverse, people who get fewer than 7 hours of sleep on average. The HP 2030 target has been adjusted accordingly.</span></div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults with Good Physical and Mental Health

Current Value:
50.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.6%), Hawaii has a value of 50.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.6% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (50.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (55.8%).
Prior Value
(55.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Health Status of Good or Better

Current Value:
86.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (83.0%), Hawaii has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (86.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.8%).
Prior Value
(87.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Sexual Minority Adults

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Sexual Minority Adults

6.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.4%).
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Sexual or Gender Minority Adults

Current Value:
6.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Internet Usage

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Internet Usage

90.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.0%), Hawaii has a value of 90.4%.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (90.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (83.7%).
Prior Value
(83.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Receive Food Stamps or SNAP

Current Value:
14.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Receive Free Food

Current Value:
11.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (12.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(12.9%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Report Food Scarcity

Current Value:
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.7%).
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.9%)