Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Cancer Plan 2030 Tracker

Cancer remains the second leading cause of death in our state and affects every individual, family, and community. We are very proud to present the fourth rendition of the Hawai‘i Cancer Plan. The plan was created with input from a group of diverse, focused, and compassionate individuals dedicated to saving the lives of and improving the quality of life for people affected by cancer.
 
The Hawai‘i Cancer Plan 2030 is intended as a road map for the next ten years that will guide state cancer control efforts and promote collaboration between public and private agencies. The battle against cancer requires the collective effort, cooperation, and collaboration of a multitude of organizations including government, business, health care, research, and non-profit, as well as communities and individuals to achieve our state vision of “No More Cancer.”
 
This tracker is designed to keep all stakeholders updated on our progress. Click here to access the Cancer Plan 2030 Executive Summary. For more information on how to use this tracker, click here

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Have Had Cancer

Current Value:
6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (5.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(5.2%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

118.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (146.4), Hawaii has a value of 118.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (107.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(107.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-1:  </span></span><span>Reduce the overall cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii

Breast Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Breast Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
140.2
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Hawaii has a value of 140.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (122.8), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(122.8)

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Death Rate

18.1
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Hawaii has a value of 18.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
<div> <div>C-04: Reduce the female breast cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

78.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (92.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(92.1%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div> <div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii

Cervical Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Cervical Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.9
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Hawaii has a value of 6.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (6.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(6.1)

State: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.0
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.3), Hawaii has a value of 2.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.3 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.4)

State: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Screening

Current Value:
80.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(84.3%)
<div> <div>C-09: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer.<br /> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test

Current Value:
76.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (83.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(83.7%)

State: Hawaii Women 30-65 Who Had an HPV Test

Current Value:
44.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (49.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(49.3%)

State: Hawaii Adults 18-26 with HPV Vaccines

Current Value:
32.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (34.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(34.8%)

State: Hawaii Adolescents 13-15 with HPV Vaccines

Current Value:
66.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Hawaii has a value of 66.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (80.0%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(80.0%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.0%)
<div><span>IID-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who get recommended doses of the HPV vaccine<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Colorectal Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Colorectal Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
38.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Hawaii has a value of 38.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (35.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(35.3)

State: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
12.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Hawaii has a value of 12.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.9)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div> <div>C-06: Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Screening

Current Value:
77.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.8%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (74.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div> <div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii

Liver Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Liver Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Hawaii has a value of 9.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

State: Hawaii Liver or Bile Duct Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
6.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7), Hawaii has a value of 6.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

State: Hawaii Acute Hepatitis B Incidence Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.1)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.1)
<div>IID-11: Reduce the rate of acute hepatitis B</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

State: Hawaii Hepatitis B-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
1.1
Per 100,000 People
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.4), Hawaii has a value of 1.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (0.16), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.16)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.16), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.16)
<div><span>IID-15: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis B as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Hepatitis C-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
2.3
Per 100,000 People
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.2), Hawaii has a value of 2.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.44), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.44)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.44), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.44)
<div><span>IID-16: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis C as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults with Hepatitis B Vaccines

Current Value:
37.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (44.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(44.7%)

State: Hawaii

Lung & Oral Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Lung & Oral Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
41.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Hawaii has a value of 41.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (38.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(38.3)

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Death Rate

21.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.7), Hawaii has a value of 21.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.3)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-02:  </span></span><span>Reduce the lung cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Oropharyngeal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.7), Hawaii has a value of 2.7.
US Value
(2.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (2.6), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(2.6)

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (12.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(12.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (7.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(7.5%)
<div><span>C-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for lung cancer </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in differently as adults 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit in the last 15 years. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Prostate Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Prostate Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
101.1
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Hawaii has a value of 101.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.1)

State: Hawaii Prostate Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
15.9
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Hawaii has a value of 15.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (15.0), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(15.0)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-08:  </span></span><span>Reduce the prostate cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor

Current Value:
14.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (16.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(16.2%)

State: Hawaii Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

Current Value:
25.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (27.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(27.9%)

State: Hawaii

Skin Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Skin Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
4.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

State: Hawaii Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Melanoma Incidence Rate

24.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (22.5), Hawaii has a value of 24.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.2), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.2)

State: Hawaii Melanoma Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
1.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.0), Hawaii has a value of 1.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.1)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:
13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.9%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use Sunscreen

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (84.5%), Hawaii has a value of 16.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults with Sunburns, past year

Current Value:
32.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (33.1%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(33.1%)

State: Hawaii

Survivorship

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Survivorship

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

9.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.8%)

State: Hawaii Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
64.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors Who Smoke Cigarettes or E-cigarettes

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.6%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.6%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors Who Have Obesity

Current Value:
21.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (19.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(19.5%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with a Written Treatment Summary

52.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (59.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(59.7%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with Instructions for Follow Up Care

81.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (82.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(82.8%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with a Survivorship Care Plan

Current Value:
27.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (30.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(30.5%)

State: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with an Advance Directive

Current Value:
65.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (70.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(70.5%)