Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Oral Health Tracker

 
This Oral Health data tracker is designed to monitor the burden of oral disease, use of the oral health care delivery system, and the status of preventive interventions including regular dental care and community water fluoridation. The tracker compiles state oral health data from national and state surveillance systems and program sources like Medicaid (QUEST) and Head Start. Healthy People 2030 targets are provided when available.
 
Click on any of the health indicators  to learn more about how it is defined and collected and to view trends tables, charts and comparison data.  This tracker is a collaborative effort between the Hawai‘i State Department of Health and the Hawai‘i Oral Health Coalition.
For more information on how to use this tracker, please click here

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Hawaii

Among Children

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Among Children

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Children Who Visited a Dentist in the Past Year

87.7%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (78.6%), Hawaii has a value of 87.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (87.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.7%).
Prior Value
(86.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year

Current Value:
78.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (78.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.5%).
Prior Value
(80.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year

Current Value:
79.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (75.9%), Hawaii has a value of 79.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(75.9% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (79.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.2%).
Prior Value
(80.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Children with Poor or Fair Teeth

Current Value:
4.0%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Children with Oral Health Problems

Current Value:
12.3%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.5%), Hawaii has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Children with Cavities or Tooth Decay

Current Value:
10.6%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.2%), Hawaii has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.2%)
<div>OH-2: Reduce the proportion of children and adolescents with active and untreated tooth decay.</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator includes youth aged 3-19 years.  <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii.  The state data source is the National Survey of Children's Health, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Children with a Preventive Dental Care Visit

Current Value:
84.9%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (75.1%), Hawaii has a value of 84.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(75.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (84.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.6%).
Prior Value
(85.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (79.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(79.9%)
<div>OH-09: Increase the proportion of low-income youth who have a preventive dental visit.</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is limited to youth who reside in households with income less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level.  <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the same as for the state. To see the exact comparison view by percent of Federal Poverty Level subgroup 0-199%.</span></div> <div> </div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii

During Pregnancy

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

During Pregnancy

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Women Who Knew Oral Health Was Important During Pregnancy

88.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (88.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.7%).
Prior Value
(88.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance

Current Value:
81.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.3%).
Prior Value
(81.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (75.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(75.0%)
<div><span>AHS-02: Increase the proportion of people with dental insurance </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist

Current Value:
46.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.3%).
Prior Value
(48.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy

44.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (40.0%), Hawaii has a value of 44.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(40.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.4%).
Prior Value
(42.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy

Current Value:
84.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (84.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.0%).
Prior Value
(84.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy

11.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy

Current Value:
47.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.3%).
Prior Value
(47.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS

Current Value:
81.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.9%).
Prior Value
(80.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Among Adults

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Among Adults

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
71.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (65.2%), Hawaii has a value of 71.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.7%).
Prior Value
(74.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with One or More Tooth Extractions

Current Value:
38.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.4%), Hawaii has a value of 38.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults with Substantial Tooth Loss

Current Value:
8.0%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.4%).
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults 45+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
3.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.4%)
<div><span>OH-05: Reduce the proportion of adults aged 45 years and over who have lost all their teeth. <br /><br />The national indicator defined exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) which is based on a physical exam and from which data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data for this objective is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
5.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Priority Populations: MedQUEST Children

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Priority Populations: MedQUEST Children

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii EPSDT Children 1-18 Who Received Preventive Dental Services

48.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (48.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (47.2%).
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii EPSDT Children 1-18 Who Received Dental Treatment Services

32.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (31.5%).
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii EPSDT Children 1-18 Referred for Corrective Oral Health Treatment

25.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (25.1%).
Prior Value
(25.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii EPSDT Children 6-9 Who Received Any Dental Services

71.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (70.0%).
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii EPSDT Children 6-14 Who Received Protective Dental Sealants

10.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii

Priority Populations: Head Start Children

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Priority Populations: Head Start Children

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Head Start Children Who Received a Dental Exam

Current Value:
52.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.6%), Hawaii has a value of 52.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(55.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (52.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (84.1%).
Prior Value
(84.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Head Start Children Who Needed Oral Health Treatment

11.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (15.6%), Hawaii has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Head Start Children Who Received Oral Health Treatment

70.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (63.3%), Hawaii has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(63.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (70.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.7%).
Prior Value
(83.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Community Supports

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community Supports

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Population with Fluoridated Water

Current Value:
8.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (73.0%), Hawaii has a value of 8.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (77.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(77.1%)
<div><span>OH-11: Increase the proportion of persons served by community systems with optimally fluoridated water systems.<br /><br />The national indicator is defined exactly the same way is based on the population covered by public or community water systems in the United States. The state indicator is taken from the same data source as the national indicator. </span></div>

State: Hawaii

Oral Health Providers

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Oral Health Providers

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Dentist Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Dentist Rate

88
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (88) is less and worse than the previously measured value (90).
Prior Value
(90)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Dental Hygienist Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Dental Hygienist Rate

68.7
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (68.7) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.7).
Prior Value
(66.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

State: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists

Current Value:
798
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (798) is greater and better than the previously measured value (794).
Prior Value
(794)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims

401
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (401) is less and worse than the previously measured value (429).
Prior Value
(429)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims

50.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (50.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.2%).
Prior Value
(57.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims

283
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (283) is greater and better than the previously measured value (276).
Prior Value
(276)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims

35.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (35.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (36.8%).
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii

Emergency Department Visits

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Emergency Department Visits

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Oral Health ED Visits

Current Value:
379.8
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (379.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (383.7).
Prior Value
(383.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits

Current Value:
560.1
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (560.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (571.7).
Prior Value
(571.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Children Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services

256
Children
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (256) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (142).
Prior Value
(142)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Adults Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services

36
Adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14).
Prior Value
(14)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.