Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Acute Hepatitis B Incidence Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.0), Maui has a value of 0.0.
HI Value
(0.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.1)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.1)
<div>IID-11: Reduce the rate of acute hepatitis B</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Maui Adults 18-26 with HPV Vaccines

Current Value:
27.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.9%), Maui has a value of 27.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(32.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (27.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (34.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(34.8%)

County: Maui Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
29.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Maui has a value of 29.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Maui has a value of 29.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (29.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.5%).
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who Have Had Cancer

Current Value:
5.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Maui has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.5%), Maui has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (5.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (5.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(5.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.8%), Maui has a value of 6.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.6%), Maui has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (6.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

County: Maui Adults with Hepatitis B Vaccines

Current Value:
33.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Maui has a value of 33.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (33.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.9%).
Prior Value
(32.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (44.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(44.7%)

County: Maui Adults with Sunburns, past year

Current Value:
34.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.2%), Maui has a value of 34.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (34.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.3%).
Prior Value
(36.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (33.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(33.1%)

County: Maui All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
406.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 406.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (413.9), Maui has a value of 406.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(413.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Maui has a value of 406.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (406.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (411.5).
Prior Value
(411.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 14.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,001 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Maui has a value of 14.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.9), Maui has a value of 14.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (14.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0).
Prior Value
(15.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
4.2
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.3), Maui has a value of 4.2 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4), Maui has a value of 4.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.4).
Prior Value
(4.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Breast Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
15.6
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.1), Maui has a value of 15.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(18.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Maui has a value of 15.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (15.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5).
Prior Value
(16.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
<div> <div>C-04: Reduce the female breast cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Maui Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
138.0
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 138.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (140.2), Maui has a value of 138.0 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(140.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Maui has a value of 138.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (138.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (138.1).
Prior Value
(138.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (122.8), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(122.8)

County: Maui Breast Cancer Screening

Current Value:
84.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.5%), Maui has a value of 84.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(78.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.3%), Maui has a value of 84.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (84.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.8%).
Prior Value
(85.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (92.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(92.1%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div> <div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Maui Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Cancer Death Rate

121.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (118.2), Maui has a value of 121.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(118.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (146.4), Maui has a value of 121.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (121.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (127.2).
Prior Value
(127.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (107.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(107.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-1:  </span></span><span>Reduce the overall cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Maui Cancer Survivors Who Have Obesity

Current Value:
16.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Maui has a value of 16.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (16.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.8%).
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (19.5%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(19.5%)

County: Maui Cancer Survivors Who Smoke Cigarettes or E-cigarettes

8.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.6%), Maui has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (8.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.6%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.6%)

County: Maui Cancer Survivors with a Survivorship Care Plan

26.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.5%), Maui has a value of 26.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (26.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.1%).
Prior Value
(22.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (30.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(30.5%)

County: Maui Cancer Survivors with a Written Treatment Summary

51.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (52.7%), Maui has a value of 51.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (51.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.3%).
Prior Value
(41.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (59.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(59.7%)

County: Maui Cancer Survivors with an Advance Directive

Current Value:
70.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (65.8%), Maui has a value of 70.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(65.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (70.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.4%).
Prior Value
(56.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (70.5%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(70.5%)

County: Maui Cancer Survivors with Instructions for Follow Up Care

91.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.1%), Maui has a value of 91.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(81.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (91.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.5%).
Prior Value
(77.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (82.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(82.8%)

County: Maui Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (11.0%), Maui has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Maui has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Cervical Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
1.3
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0), Maui has a value of 1.3 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.0 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.3), Maui has a value of 1.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.3 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.9).
Prior Value
(1.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.4), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.4)

County: Maui Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.0
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 6.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.9), Maui has a value of 6.0 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Maui has a value of 6.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (6.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.5).
Prior Value
(5.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (6.1), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(6.1)

County: Maui Cervical Cancer Screening

Current Value:
78.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.2%), Maui has a value of 78.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (78.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.8%).
Prior Value
(83.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(84.3%)
<div> <div>C-09: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer.<br /> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Maui Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.9
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 14.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 721 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.5), Maui has a value of 14.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Maui has a value of 14.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (14.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2).
Prior Value
(15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
75.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 75.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Maui has a value of 75.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Maui Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
13.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.1), Maui has a value of 13.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Maui has a value of 13.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (13.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.3).
Prior Value
(15.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.9)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div> <div>C-06: Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Maui Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
42.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 42.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (38.8), Maui has a value of 42.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Maui has a value of 42.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (42.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.8).
Prior Value
(42.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (35.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(35.3)

County: Maui Colorectal Cancer Screening

Current Value:
79.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (77.1%), Maui has a value of 79.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(77.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (74.2%), Maui has a value of 79.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (79.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.0%).
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.8%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (74.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div> <div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Maui Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
74.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (64.9%), Maui has a value of 74.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(64.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (74.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.1%).
Prior Value
(74.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Maui Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

9.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.0%), Maui has a value of 9.1%.
HI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Maui has a value of 9.1%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (9.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Maui Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 9.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.8), Maui has a value of 9.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Maui has a value of 9.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (9.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.4).
Prior Value
(9.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Maui Liver or Bile Duct Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
8.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.2), Maui has a value of 8.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.2 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7), Maui has a value of 8.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (8.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.4).
Prior Value
(8.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Maui Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
37.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 37.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (41.7), Maui has a value of 37.2 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(41.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Maui has a value of 37.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (37.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.4).
Prior Value
(38.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (38.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(38.3)

County: Maui Lung Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Lung Cancer Death Rate

22.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.9), Maui has a value of 22.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.7), Maui has a value of 22.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (22.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.7).
Prior Value
(23.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.3)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-02:  </span></span><span>Reduce the lung cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Maui Lung Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Maui Lung Cancer Screening

18.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Maui has a value of 18.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (9.7%), Maui has a value of 18.1% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(9.7% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (18.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (12.3%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(12.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (7.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(7.5%)
<div><span>C-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for lung cancer </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in differently as adults 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit in the last 15 years. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Maui Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
43.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 43.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (44.0%), Maui has a value of 43.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Maui has a value of 43.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (43.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.0%).
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Melanoma Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
1.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.5), Maui has a value of 1.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6), Maui has a value of 1.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.7).
Prior Value
(1.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.1)

County: Maui Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
32.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 32.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (24.4), Maui has a value of 32.9 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(24.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5), Maui has a value of 32.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (32.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.3).
Prior Value
(35.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.2), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.2)

County: Maui Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

Current Value:
28.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Maui has a value of 28.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (31.8%), Maui has a value of 28.0% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(31.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (28.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.4%).
Prior Value
(19.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (27.9%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(27.9%)

County: Maui Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor

Current Value:
14.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.7%), Maui has a value of 14.7%.
HI Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (14.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (16.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(16.2%)

County: Maui Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
12.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 12.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,912 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (14.9), Maui has a value of 12.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6), Maui has a value of 12.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.2).
Prior Value
(13.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 14.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.0), Maui has a value of 14.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Maui has a value of 14.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (14.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.5).
Prior Value
(15.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Oropharyngeal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.7), Maui has a value of 2.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.7 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7), Maui has a value of 2.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (2.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.7).
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (2.6), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(2.6)

County: Maui Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.1
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 9.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 908 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.2), Maui has a value of 9.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.1), Maui has a value of 9.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (9.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.6).
Prior Value
(9.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 10.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,733 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Maui has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2), Maui has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.3).
Prior Value
(11.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Prostate Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
16.9
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9), Maui has a value of 16.9 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Maui has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (16.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.3).
Prior Value
(16.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (15.0), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(15.0)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-08:  </span></span><span>Reduce the prostate cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Maui Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
84.6
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 84.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (101.1), Maui has a value of 84.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(101.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Maui has a value of 84.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (84.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.6).
Prior Value
(76.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.1)

County: Maui Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:
16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.1%), Maui has a value of 16.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.5%), Maui has a value of 16.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (16.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)

County: Maui Uterine Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
31.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4), Maui has a value of 31.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.4), Maui has a value of 31.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (31.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.1).
Prior Value
(32.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test

Current Value:
75.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.1%), Maui has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (77.7%), Maui has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (75.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.0%).
Prior Value
(80.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (83.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(83.7%)

County: Maui Women 30-65 Who Had an HPV Test

Current Value:
41.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.8%), Maui has a value of 41.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (41.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.2%).
Prior Value
(48.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (49.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(49.3%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:
12.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Maui has a value of 12.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)