Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adult Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.5%), Hawaii has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline

Current Value:
72.7
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.3), Hawaii has a value of 72.7 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(71.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (72.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.3).
Prior Value
(71.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (81), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(81)

County: Hawaii Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults Happy with Weight

49.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.4%), Hawaii has a value of 49.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Hawaii has a value of 49.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (49.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (52.4%).
Prior Value
(52.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

72.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 72.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (75.5%), Hawaii has a value of 72.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Hawaii has a value of 72.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (72.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (78.9%).
Prior Value
(78.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

Current Value:
13.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.8%), Hawaii has a value of 13.3%.
HI Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.3%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3%).
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Binge Drink

18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.2%), Hawaii has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (16.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.4%).
Prior Value
(19.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (25.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(25.4%)
<div>SU-10: Reduce the proportion of people aged 21 years and over who engaged in binge drinking in the past month <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator includes persons aged 21 and over.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source but includes adults 18 years and older.</div>

County: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Excessively

Current Value:
20.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Hawaii has a value of 20.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device

33.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.0%), Hawaii has a value of 33.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (28.0%), Hawaii has a value of 33.7% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.2%).
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

Current Value:
24.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.7%), Hawaii has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Hawaii has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.4%).
Prior Value
(28.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Current Value:
69.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.7%), Hawaii has a value of 69.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Hawaii has a value of 69.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (69.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
30.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Hawaii has a value of 30.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 30.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Hawaii Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home

Current Value:
80.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.0%), Hawaii has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.0%), Hawaii has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73.4%).
Prior Value
(73.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days

33.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (38.3%), Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(38.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.4%), Hawaii has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.3%).
Prior Value
(35.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Get Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:
40.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.6%), Hawaii has a value of 40.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(45.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (40.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.8%).
Prior Value
(38.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4%)
<div>SH-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as adults who get an average of at least 7 hours of sleep. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source, but is the inverse, people who get fewer than 7 hours of sleep on average. The HP 2030 target has been adjusted accordingly.</span></div> <div> </div>

County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

25.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.8%), Hawaii has a value of 25.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Hawaii has a value of 25.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

57.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (56.0%), Hawaii has a value of 57.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 57.4% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (57.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

42.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.3%), Hawaii has a value of 42.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 42.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.7%).
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (40.3%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

Current Value:
37.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Hawaii has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Hawaii has a value of 37.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.9%).
Prior Value
(30.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
13.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.5%), Hawaii has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(6.1%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device

Current Value:
7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1%).
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (2.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(2.3%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.6%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Good Physical and Mental Health

Current Value:
48.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.3%), Hawaii has a value of 48.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.6%), Hawaii has a value of 48.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.6% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (48.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (51.4%).
Prior Value
(51.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Health Status of Good or Better

Current Value:
84.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.0%), Hawaii has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (83.0%), Hawaii has a value of 84.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (84.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.9%).
Prior Value
(85.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Hawaii Adults with High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
33.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (29.8%), Hawaii has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.1%), Hawaii has a value of 33.5% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.8%).
Prior Value
(31.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.6%)
<div>HDS-04: Reduce the proportion of adults with high blood pressure<br /> <br />The national indicator excludes pregnant women. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div>

County: Hawaii Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

37.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.2%), Hawaii has a value of 37.4%.
HI Value
(33.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 37.4%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

37.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Hawaii has a value of 37.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

County: Hawaii Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Life Expectancy

80.2
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 80.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (81.8), Hawaii has a value of 80.2 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Hawaii has a value of 80.2 which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hawaii Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

85.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 85.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (87.7%), Hawaii has a value of 85.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(87.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Hawaii has a value of 85.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (85.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (85.5%).
Prior Value
(85.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Hawaii Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Hawaii has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hawaii Sexual Minority Adults

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Sexual Minority Adults

5.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Hawaii has a value of 5.8%.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Sexual or Gender Minority Adults

Current Value:
6.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Hawaii has a value of 6.2%.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
26.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (23.5%), Hawaii has a value of 26.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Hawaii has a value of 26.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of high school students in grades who get enough sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

63.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.2%), Hawaii has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.9%), Hawaii has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (63.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (61.3%).
Prior Value
(61.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)

County: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
80.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.9%), Hawaii has a value of 80.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (80.2%), Hawaii has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.8%).
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (73.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
45.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.1%), Hawaii has a value of 45.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(46.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.2%).
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of students in grades 9 through 12 who get sufficient sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. There is no national middle school survey for students in grades 6-8; however, Hawaiʻi has additional data for this indicator. </span></div> </div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

54.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.3%), Hawaii has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (54.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
74.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.2%), Hawaii has a value of 74.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (86.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)