Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Acute Hepatitis B Incidence Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.0), Hawaii has a value of 0.0.
HI Value
(0.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.1)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.1)
<div>IID-11: Reduce the rate of acute hepatitis B</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Hawaii Adults 18-26 with HPV Vaccines

Current Value:
20.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.9%), Hawaii has a value of 20.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(32.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.5%).
Prior Value
(26.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (34.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(34.8%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
30.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Hawaii has a value of 30.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 30.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Had Cancer

Current Value:
7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Hawaii has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.5%), Hawaii has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (5.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(5.2%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.6%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Hepatitis B Vaccines

Current Value:
30.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Hawaii has a value of 30.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.8%).
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (44.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(44.7%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Sunburns, past year

Current Value:
34.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.2%), Hawaii has a value of 34.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (33.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(33.1%)

County: Hawaii All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii All Cancer Incidence Rate

395.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 395.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (413.9), Hawaii has a value of 395.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(413.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Hawaii has a value of 395.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (395.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (400.5).
Prior Value
(400.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 14.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,001 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Hawaii has a value of 14.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.9), Hawaii has a value of 14.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.5).
Prior Value
(14.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
5.2
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.3), Hawaii has a value of 5.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4), Hawaii has a value of 5.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0).
Prior Value
(5.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Death Rate

18.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.1), Hawaii has a value of 18.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Hawaii has a value of 18.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4).
Prior Value
(16.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
<div> <div>C-04: Reduce the female breast cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
122.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 122.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (140.2), Hawaii has a value of 122.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(140.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Hawaii has a value of 122.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (122.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (125.8).
Prior Value
(125.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (122.8), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(122.8)

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

75.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.5%), Hawaii has a value of 75.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(78.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.3%), Hawaii has a value of 75.3% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.2%).
Prior Value
(82.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (92.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(92.1%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div> <div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

134.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (118.2), Hawaii has a value of 134.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(118.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (146.4), Hawaii has a value of 134.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (134.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (141.2).
Prior Value
(141.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (107.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(107.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-1:  </span></span><span>Reduce the overall cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors Who Have Obesity

Current Value:
26.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Hawaii has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.6%).
Prior Value
(24.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (19.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(19.5%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors Who Smoke Cigarettes or E-cigarettes

15.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Hawaii has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.6%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.6%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with a Survivorship Care Plan

Current Value:
20.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.5%), Hawaii has a value of 20.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.1%).
Prior Value
(27.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (30.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(30.5%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with a Written Treatment Summary

46.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (52.7%), Hawaii has a value of 46.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.6%).
Prior Value
(45.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (59.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(59.7%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with an Advance Directive

Current Value:
60.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (65.8%), Hawaii has a value of 60.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(65.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (60.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.6%).
Prior Value
(59.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (70.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(70.5%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with Instructions for Follow Up Care

79.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.1%), Hawaii has a value of 79.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (79.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.5%).
Prior Value
(60.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (82.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(82.8%)

County: Hawaii Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (11.0%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.2
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0), Hawaii has a value of 2.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.0 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.3), Hawaii has a value of 2.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.3 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.6).
Prior Value
(2.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.4)

County: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.9), Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4).
Prior Value
(7.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (6.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(6.1)

County: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Screening

82.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.2%), Hawaii has a value of 82.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (82.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.5%).
Prior Value
(83.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(84.3%)
<div> <div>C-09: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer.<br /> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
15.2
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 15.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 721 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.5), Hawaii has a value of 15.2 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Hawaii has a value of 15.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1).
Prior Value
(14.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
73.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 73.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Hawaii has a value of 73.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
11.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.1), Hawaii has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Hawaii has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.7).
Prior Value
(10.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.9)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div> <div>C-06: Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
33.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 33.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (38.8), Hawaii has a value of 33.0 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(38.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Hawaii has a value of 33.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.5).
Prior Value
(34.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (35.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(35.3)

County: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Screening

Current Value:
74.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (77.1%), Hawaii has a value of 74.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(77.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (74.2%), Hawaii has a value of 74.7% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.0%).
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.8%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (74.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div> <div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
61.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (64.9%), Hawaii has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(64.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (61.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.1%).
Prior Value
(68.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

Current Value:
10.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.0%), Hawaii has a value of 10.5%.
HI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Hawaii has a value of 10.5%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Hawaii Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
8.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 8.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.8), Hawaii has a value of 8.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Hawaii has a value of 8.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0).
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Hawaii Liver or Bile Duct Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
8.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.2), Hawaii has a value of 8.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.2 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7), Hawaii has a value of 8.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1).
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Hawaii Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
40.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 40.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (41.7), Hawaii has a value of 40.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(41.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Hawaii has a value of 40.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (40.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.4).
Prior Value
(43.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (38.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(38.3)

County: Hawaii Lung Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Lung Cancer Death Rate

24.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.9), Hawaii has a value of 24.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.7), Hawaii has a value of 24.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.1).
Prior Value
(25.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.3)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-02:  </span></span><span>Reduce the lung cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Hawaii has a value of 9.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (9.7%), Hawaii has a value of 9.5% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(9.7% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (12.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(12.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (7.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(7.5%)
<div><span>C-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for lung cancer </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in differently as adults 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit in the last 15 years. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 38.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (44.0%), Hawaii has a value of 38.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Hawaii has a value of 38.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (39.0%).
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Melanoma Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2), Hawaii has a value of 2.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.0), Hawaii has a value of 2.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2).
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.1)

County: Hawaii Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Melanoma Incidence Rate

32.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 32.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (24.4), Hawaii has a value of 32.9 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(24.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5), Hawaii has a value of 32.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.6).
Prior Value
(32.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.2), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.2)

County: Hawaii Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

Current Value:
24.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Hawaii has a value of 24.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (31.8%), Hawaii has a value of 24.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(31.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (27.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(27.9%)

County: Hawaii Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor

Current Value:
13.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.7%), Hawaii has a value of 13.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (16.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(16.2%)

County: Hawaii Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
17.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 17.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,912 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (14.9), Hawaii has a value of 17.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6), Hawaii has a value of 17.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.8).
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
12.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 12.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.0), Hawaii has a value of 12.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Hawaii has a value of 12.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.5).
Prior Value
(12.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Oropharyngeal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.7), Hawaii has a value of 2.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.7 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7), Hawaii has a value of 2.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.1).
Prior Value
(2.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (2.6), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(2.6)

County: Hawaii Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
7.9
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 7.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 908 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.2), Hawaii has a value of 7.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.1), Hawaii has a value of 7.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.5).
Prior Value
(8.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
13.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 13.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,733 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Hawaii has a value of 13.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2), Hawaii has a value of 13.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.9).
Prior Value
(14.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Prostate Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
19.2
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9), Hawaii has a value of 19.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Hawaii has a value of 19.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.2).
Prior Value
(17.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (15.0), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(15.0)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-08:  </span></span><span>Reduce the prostate cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
84.8
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 84.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (101.1), Hawaii has a value of 84.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(101.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Hawaii has a value of 84.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (84.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.6).
Prior Value
(79.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.1)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Sunscreen

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.1%), Hawaii has a value of 15.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.5%), Hawaii has a value of 15.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)

County: Hawaii Uterine Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
30.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4), Hawaii has a value of 30.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.4), Hawaii has a value of 30.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.6).
Prior Value
(30.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test

Current Value:
77.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.1%), Hawaii has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (77.7%), Hawaii has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.8%).
Prior Value
(77.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (83.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(83.7%)

County: Hawaii Women 30-65 Who Had an HPV Test

Current Value:
46.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.8%), Hawaii has a value of 46.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.9%).
Prior Value
(41.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (49.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(49.3%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Hawaii has a value of 13.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)