Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Physical Activity and Nutrition Plan Tracker

PAN PLAN Tracker
The Hawai‘i Physical Activity and Nutrition Plan 2013-2020 (PAN Plan 2020) describes strategies to increase physical activity and healthy eating, with long-term goals of reducing overweight, obesity, and chronic disease among all Hawai‘i residents. Its purpose is to provide a framework for policy makers, public and private organizations, and community members to work together to educate, advocate for policies, and build an environment that allows our residents to embrace a physically active and nutritionally sound lifestyle.

Hawai‘i can significantly increase physical activity and improve nutrition through collaborative, coordinated efforts of organizations, governments, and individuals working together to implement this updated Physical Activity and Nutrition Plan. Over 200 stakeholders from across the state provided guidance, expertise, and input for this plan. It focuses primarily on policy, systems, and environmental changes that will transform our communities, schools, work places, and health care so the healthy choice will be the easy choice.

Vision
We envision a future for Hawai‘i in which all residents are physically active, eat healthy food, and live in healthy communities.
 
Goals
Through healthful eating and regular physical activity, Hawai‘i residents will:
          1.  Reduce their burden of disease;
          2.  Increase years of healthy life; and
          3.  Reduce health disparities.

The PAN Plan Tracker is funded by the Healthy Hawaii Initiative with support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   

A new PAN Plan Tracker based on the 2030 PAN Plan is under construction. Click here to preview some of the new long term goals.

***This tracker will be retired on December 31, 2023.***

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Hawaii

Physical Activity and Nutrition Long-Term Outcomes

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Physical Activity and Nutrition Long-Term Outcomes

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (19.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(19.4%)

State: Hawaii Teen Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
13.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (22.3%), Hawaii has a value of 13.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(22.3% in 2011)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.4%)

State: Hawaii Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
88.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.8%), Hawaii has a value of 88.4% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (88.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.1%).
Prior Value
(90.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (83.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(83.9%)

State: Hawaii Adults with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
37.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.6%), Hawaii has a value of 37.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.3%).
Prior Value
(37.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (43.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(43.1%)

State: Hawaii Teens with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
71.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Hawaii has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (71.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.2%).
Prior Value
(69.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (76.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(76.8%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

56.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 56.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (56.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

37.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Hawaii has a value of 37.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

24.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Hawaii has a value of 24.8% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.6%).
Prior Value
(24.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (23.9%), Hawaii has a value of 23.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (17.1%).
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (26.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)

State: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
82.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (80.2%), Hawaii has a value of 82.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (82.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.6%).
Prior Value
(81.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (73.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
76.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (76.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.4%).
Prior Value
(76.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (86.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)

State: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

58.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (53.9%), Hawaii has a value of 58.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (58.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.3%).
Prior Value
(59.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)

State: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

51.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (51.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.4%).
Prior Value
(55.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

State: Hawaii Adults with Health Status of Good or Better

Current Value:
86.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (83.0%), Hawaii has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (86.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.8%).
Prior Value
(87.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

State: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (10.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(10.4%)

State: Hawaii Teens Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day

10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (15.1%), Hawaii has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.1% in 2019)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.4%)

State: Hawaii Infants Who Were Breastfed at 6 Months

Current Value:
68.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.2%), Hawaii has a value of 68.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (68.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.9%).
Prior Value
(70.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (60.6%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(60.6%)

State: Hawaii Infants Who Were Breastfed Exclusively Through 3 Months

51.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (45.3%), Hawaii has a value of 51.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (51.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.6%).
Prior Value
(50.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (56.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(56.2%)

State: Hawaii Infants Who Were Ever Breastfed

Current Value:
89.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (83.1%), Hawaii has a value of 89.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (89.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.1%).
Prior Value
(90.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (93.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(93.6%)

State: Hawaii Infants Still Breastfeeding at 8 Weeks

Current Value:
80.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (68.5%), Hawaii has a value of 80.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(68.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.8%).
Prior Value
(85.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (94.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(94.4%)

State: Hawaii

Media

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Media

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Statewide Media Plan that Promotes Healthy Eating and Active Living

1
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii

Community Design and Access - Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community Design and Access - Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Funding for Safe Routes to School

Current Value:
$550,000
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii ($550,000) is not statistically different from the previously measured value ($550,000).
Prior Value
($550,000)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target ($1,026,923), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
($1,026,923)

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Active Transportation

Current Value:
10.1%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.2%), Hawaii has a value of 10.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.1%)

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Bicycling

Current Value:
0.8%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Hawaii has a value of 0.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.8%).
Prior Value
(0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (0.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(0.9%)

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.1% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
<div> <div>EH-02: Increase trips to work made by mass transit</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(5.3%)

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Walking

Current Value:
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Hawaii has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.4% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Hawaii has a value of 4.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.8%)

State: Hawaii

Community Design and Access - Nutrition

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Community Design and Access - Nutrition

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Farmers Markets that Accept SNAP EBT Transactions

27
Farmers markets
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (27) is less and worse than the previously measured value (29).
Prior Value
(29)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (71), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(71)

State: Hawaii Statewide Policies that Increase Access to Healthy Food

3
Policies
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3).
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (2), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(2)

State: Hawaii

Educational Systems

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Educational Systems

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii National Recommendations for Health and Physical Education Classes

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Monitoring System to Assess Health and Physical Education Content and Performance in Schools

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Health and Physical Education Requirements in Grades 6 to 8

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Certified Health and Physical Education Teachers

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Positions Supporting School Gardens and Agriculture

1
Positions
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (2), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(2)

State: Hawaii Schools with Gardens

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Schools with Gardens

87.9%
(2016-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (87.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (87.0%).
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (87%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(87%)

State: Hawaii Schools with Gardens Used for Instruction

Current Value:
91.6%
(2016-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (91.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (94.7%).
Prior Value
(94.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (90%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(90%)

State: Hawaii Wellness Guidelines for Early Childhood

Current Value:
1
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Integrated Wellness Guidelines in Childcare License Requirements

0
Requirements
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Physical Exam Requirement for Grade 7

Current Value:
1
Requirements
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0).
Prior Value
(1.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii

Worksite, Industry, and Business

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Worksite, Industry, and Business

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Policies Increasing Worksite Wellness Programs

Current Value:
1
Policies
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (2), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(2)

State: Hawaii State Worksite Wellness Coordinator

Current Value:
1
Positions
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii

Health Care Systems

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Health Care Systems

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adult Weight Screening and Follow Up

Current Value:
64.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (59.4%), Hawaii has a value of 64.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.4% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (64.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (70.1%).
Prior Value
(70.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (37.8%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(37.8%)

State: Hawaii Children 3-16 Weight Screening and Follow Up

Current Value:
69.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (57.9%), Hawaii has a value of 69.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.9% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (69.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.1%).
Prior Value
(69.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (25.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(25.9%)

State: Hawaii Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

42.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (37.8%).
Prior Value
(37.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

State: Hawaii Insurance Benefits for Nutritional and Physical Activity Services

0
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (1), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(1)

State: Hawaii Births Occurring in Baby-Friendly Facilities

Current Value:
12.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.3%), Hawaii has a value of 12.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(18.3% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (13.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(13.2%)

State: Hawaii Mothers Who Ever Breastfed

Current Value:
94.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (87.9%), Hawaii has a value of 94.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.9% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.5%).
Prior Value
(96.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

State: Hawaii Infants Who Were Breastfed Exclusively Through 6 Months

26.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (25.4%), Hawaii has a value of 26.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.7%).
Prior Value
(27.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.4%)
<div> <div> <div>MICH-15: Increase the proportion of infants who are breastfed exclusively through age 6 months</div> </div> <div> </div> <div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.4%)