Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Adolescent Health
Health / Adolescent Health
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Intimate Partner Violence Among Teens
County: Maui Intimate Partner Violence Among Teens
7.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Teens
County: Maui Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Teens
2.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui LGB Teens Who Are Bullied
County: Maui LGB Teens Who Are Bullied
16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(32.0% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-05: Reduce bullying of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Maui LGB Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
County: Maui LGB Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
40.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(39.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(48.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(46.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(52.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-06: Reduce suicidal thoughts in lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition includes making a plan or attempting suicide in the past 12 months. The data source is the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Maui LGB Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
County: Maui LGB Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
53.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Maui Teens Who Are Bullied
County: Maui Teens Who Are Bullied
14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Teens Who Are Cyberbullied
County: Maui Teens Who Are Cyberbullied
14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Teens Who Ever Used illicit drugs
County: Maui Teens Who Ever Used illicit drugs
33.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Maui Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need
County: Maui Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need
21.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Maui Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep
County: Maui Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep
27.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div>
<div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04: </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of high school students in grades who get enough sleep</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
</div>
County: Maui Teens Who Skipped School for Safety
County: Maui Teens Who Skipped School for Safety
8.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
54.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(55.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)
County: Maui Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time
County: Maui Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time
82.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(82.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(80.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)
County: Maui Teens with Recent Depression
County: Maui Teens with Recent Depression
36.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
County: Maui Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Young Teens Who Are Bullied
County: Maui Young Teens Who Are Bullied
32.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(42.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Young Teens Who Are Cyberbullied
County: Maui Young Teens Who Are Cyberbullied
28.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Young Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need
County: Maui Young Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need
24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(22.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Maui Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep
County: Maui Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep
47.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(46.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(51.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div>
<div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04: </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of students in grades 9 through 12 who get sufficient sleep</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. There is no national middle school survey for students in grades 6-8; however, Hawaiʻi has additional data for this indicator. </span></div>
</div>
County: Maui Young Teens Who Skipped School for Safety
County: Maui Young Teens Who Skipped School for Safety
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
55.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(52.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)
County: Maui Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time
County: Maui Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time
74.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(77.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)
County: Maui Young Teens with Ever Depression
County: Maui Young Teens with Ever Depression
36.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
County: Maui Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
25.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(29.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Illegal Drugs on School Property HS
County: Maui Illegal Drugs on School Property HS
26.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(21.7%)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Maui Illegal Drugs on School Property MS
County: Maui Illegal Drugs on School Property MS
9.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Maui LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs
County: Maui LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs
47.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(27.8% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(16.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-07: Reduce the proportion of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students who have used illicit drugs<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Maui Teen Boys Who Binge Drink
County: Maui Teen Boys Who Binge Drink
14.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.6% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for boys, while 'Teen Girls Who Binge Drink' presents the data for girls.</span></div>
County: Maui Teen Girls Who Binge Drink
County: Maui Teen Girls Who Binge Drink
18.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.8% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for girls, while 'Teen Boys Who Binge Drink' presents the data for boys.</span></div>
County: Maui Teens Who Binge Drink
County: Maui Teens Who Binge Drink
10.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. Binge drinking is defined the same in the YRBS and NSDUH for high school students in grades 9-12. </span></div>
County: Maui Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines
County: Maui Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines
2.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Teens Who Use Alcohol
County: Maui Teens Who Use Alcohol
18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
County: Maui Teens Who Use Marijuana
County: Maui Teens Who Use Marijuana
15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
County: Maui Young Teens Who Binge Drink
County: Maui Young Teens Who Binge Drink
2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator includes adolescents ages 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. However, binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks on one occasional for girls and 5 or more drinks for boys in the NSDUH, but only as 5 or more drinks for boys or girls in this indicator for middle school students grades 6-8. </div>
County: Maui Young Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines
County: Maui Young Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines
1.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Young Teens Who Use Alcohol
County: Maui Young Teens Who Use Alcohol
6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
County: Maui Young Teens Who Use Marijuana
County: Maui Young Teens Who Use Marijuana
3.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Health / Cancer
Health / Cancer
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens Who Use Sunscreen
County: Maui Teens Who Use Sunscreen
16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen
County: Maui Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen
12.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)
Health / Family Planning
Health / Family Planning
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys
County: Maui Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys
76.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(80.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls
County: Maui Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls
72.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys
County: Maui Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys
96.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(91.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls
County: Maui Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls
95.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(95.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Condom Use Among Teen Boys
County: Maui Condom Use Among Teen Boys
49.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(48.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(81.3%)
<div>
<p>FP-06: Increase the proportion of adolescent males who used a condom the last time they had sex</p>
<p>The national indicator is defined differently as it is for adolescents aged 15-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawai‘i cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.</p>
</div>
66.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(60.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(84.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(68.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.8%)
<div><span>FP-05: Increase the proportion of adolescent females at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of high school students, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
County: Maui Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
72.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(73.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(76.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>
County: Maui Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
County: Maui Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
67.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(64.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens Who Attempted Suicide
County: Maui Teens Who Attempted Suicide
2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Teens With Disordered Eating
County: Maui Teens With Disordered Eating
22.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(22.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Young Teens Who Ever Attempted Suicide
County: Maui Young Teens Who Ever Attempted Suicide
2.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Young Teens With Disordered Eating
County: Maui Young Teens With Disordered Eating
18.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teen Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
County: Maui Teen Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(22.3% in 2011)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(15.4%)
10.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(9.4%)
29.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(26.3%)
11.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(9.5%)
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
County: Maui Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
76.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(75.9% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(79.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
County: Maui Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
County: Maui Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
74.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(79.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
Health / Physical Activity
Health / Physical Activity
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
County: Maui Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(39.0%)
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(9.6%)
County: Maui Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
County: Maui Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
45.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
31.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(37.3%)
18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(24.1%)
<div>PA-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. </div>
County: Maui Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Maui Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)
County: Maui Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Maui Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
46.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(45.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(45.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(56.1%)
County: Maui Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
County: Maui Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
County: Maui Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(10.1%)
18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(16.0%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
County: Maui Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
44.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(43.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(47.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
41.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(48.9%)
20.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
27.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Maui Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
49.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(48.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(48.8%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
County: Maui Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(14.2%)
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving
County: Maui Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving
45.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(36.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Maui Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
County: Maui Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
County: Maui Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
County: Maui Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
36.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(58.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)
County: Maui Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
County: Maui Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)
County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
51.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(49.5%)
County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet
County: Maui Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet
1.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Maui Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette
County: Maui Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(8.8%)
County: Maui Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes
County: Maui Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes
4.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)
County: Maui Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
County: Maui Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
18.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)
County: Maui Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes
County: Maui Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes
18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)
County: Maui Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors
County: Maui Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors
2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
County: Maui Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
County: Maui Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
1.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
2.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
47.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(48.8%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet
County: Maui Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet
1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette
County: Maui Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette
7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(0.7%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes
County: Maui Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes
1.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
County: Maui Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes
County: Maui Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes
7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)
Health / Weight Status
Health / Weight Status
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens who are Obese
County: Maui Teens who are Obese
13.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Teens who are Overweight
County: Maui Teens who are Overweight
13.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Maui Teens with a Healthy Body Weight
County: Maui Teens with a Healthy Body Weight
72.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(70.1% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(72.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(76.8%)
Community / Social Environment
Community / Social Environment
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To
County: Maui Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To
68.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(78.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>
County: Maui Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To
County: Maui Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To
71.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(74.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(80.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>
Economy / Food Insecurity
Economy / Food Insecurity
County: Maui
Value
Compared to:
County: Maui Teens Who Went Hungry
County: Maui Teens Who Went Hungry
7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(4.6%)
County: Maui Young Teens Who Went Hungry
County: Maui Young Teens Who Went Hungry
7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(4.9%)
