Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Adolescent Health
Health / Adolescent Health
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Intimate Partner Violence Among Teens
County: Honolulu Intimate Partner Violence Among Teens
5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Teens
County: Honolulu Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Teens
6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu LGB Teens Who Are Bullied
County: Honolulu LGB Teens Who Are Bullied
14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(32.0% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-05: Reduce bullying of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Honolulu LGB Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
County: Honolulu LGB Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
39.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(39.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(48.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(52.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-06: Reduce suicidal thoughts in lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition includes making a plan or attempting suicide in the past 12 months. The data source is the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Honolulu LGB Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
County: Honolulu LGB Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
54.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Are Bullied
County: Honolulu Teens Who Are Bullied
8.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Are Cyberbullied
County: Honolulu Teens Who Are Cyberbullied
10.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Ever Used illicit drugs
County: Honolulu Teens Who Ever Used illicit drugs
24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need
County: Honolulu Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need
19.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(21.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep
County: Honolulu Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep
21.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div>
<div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04: </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of high school students in grades who get enough sleep</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
</div>
County: Honolulu Teens Who Skipped School for Safety
County: Honolulu Teens Who Skipped School for Safety
7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time
County: Honolulu Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time
57.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(59.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)
County: Honolulu Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time
County: Honolulu Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time
83.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(82.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)
County: Honolulu Teens with Recent Depression
County: Honolulu Teens with Recent Depression
34.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
County: Honolulu Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Are Bullied
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Are Bullied
33.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(34.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Are Cyberbullied
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Are Cyberbullied
27.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need
22.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(22.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(25.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep
45.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(46.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(44.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div>
<div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04: </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of students in grades 9 through 12 who get sufficient sleep</span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. There is no national middle school survey for students in grades 6-8; however, Hawaiʻi has additional data for this indicator. </span></div>
</div>
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Skipped School for Safety
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Skipped School for Safety
7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time
County: Honolulu Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time
49.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(55.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time
County: Honolulu Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time
76.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(76.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens with Ever Depression
County: Honolulu Young Teens with Ever Depression
34.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(30.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
County: Honolulu Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts
28.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Illegal Drugs on School Property HS
County: Honolulu Illegal Drugs on School Property HS
25.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(21.7%)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Illegal Drugs on School Property MS
County: Honolulu Illegal Drugs on School Property MS
8.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs
County: Honolulu LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs
34.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(16.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-07: Reduce the proportion of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students who have used illicit drugs<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Teen Boys Who Binge Drink
County: Honolulu Teen Boys Who Binge Drink
10.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.6% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for boys, while 'Teen Girls Who Binge Drink' presents the data for girls.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Teen Girls Who Binge Drink
County: Honolulu Teen Girls Who Binge Drink
9.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.8% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for girls, while 'Teen Boys Who Binge Drink' presents the data for boys.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Teens Who Binge Drink
County: Honolulu Teens Who Binge Drink
7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. Binge drinking is defined the same in the YRBS and NSDUH for high school students in grades 9-12. </span></div>
County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines
County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines
1.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Alcohol
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Alcohol
15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Marijuana
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Marijuana
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Binge Drink
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Binge Drink
1.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator includes adolescents ages 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. However, binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks on one occasional for girls and 5 or more drinks for boys in the NSDUH, but only as 5 or more drinks for boys or girls in this indicator for middle school students grades 6-8. </div>
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines
1.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Alcohol
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Alcohol
5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Marijuana
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Marijuana
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Health / Cancer
Health / Cancer
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Sunscreen
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Sunscreen
16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen
14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)
Health / Family Planning
Health / Family Planning
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys
County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys
82.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(80.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(78.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls
County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls
82.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys
County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys
96.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(94.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls
County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls
95.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(94.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Condom Use Among Teen Boys
County: Honolulu Condom Use Among Teen Boys
41.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(48.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(81.3%)
<div>
<p>FP-06: Increase the proportion of adolescent males who used a condom the last time they had sex</p>
<p>The national indicator is defined differently as it is for adolescents aged 15-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawai‘i cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.</p>
</div>
County: Honolulu Teen Girls at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control
County: Honolulu Teen Girls at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control
57.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(62.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(84.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(36.8%)
<div><span>FP-05: Increase the proportion of adolescent females at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of high school students, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
County: Honolulu Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
74.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(73.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
72.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(66.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens Who Attempted Suicide
County: Honolulu Teens Who Attempted Suicide
1.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens With Disordered Eating
County: Honolulu Teens With Disordered Eating
21.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Ever Attempted Suicide
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Ever Attempted Suicide
3.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens With Disordered Eating
County: Honolulu Young Teens With Disordered Eating
20.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teen Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
County: Honolulu Teen Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(22.3% in 2011)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(15.4%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day
County: Honolulu Teens Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day
10.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(9.4%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages at Least Once Per Day
County: Honolulu Teens Who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages at Least Once Per Day
28.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(28.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(26.3%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Drink Sweetened Juice Drinks at Least Once Per Day
County: Honolulu Teens Who Drink Sweetened Juice Drinks at Least Once Per Day
10.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(9.5%)
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
County: Honolulu Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
80.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(75.9% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year
79.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(80.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>
Health / Physical Activity
Health / Physical Activity
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
County: Honolulu Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(39.0%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
County: Honolulu Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
9.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(9.6%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
County: Honolulu Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
41.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
34.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(37.3%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(24.1%)
<div>PA-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. </div>
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
22.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
45.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(45.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
PAN Plan Target
(56.1%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
County: Honolulu Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education
10.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(10.1%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety
17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(16.0%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity
44.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(43.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time
46.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(32.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
PAN Plan Target
(48.9%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
19.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines
26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines
45.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(41.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(48.8%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School
15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
PAN Plan Target
(14.2%)
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving
County: Honolulu Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving
35.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(36.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Honolulu Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
County: Honolulu Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight
15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(18.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
29.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
57.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(49.5%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet
County: Honolulu Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet
2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette
County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette
11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(8.8%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes
2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes
12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors
County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors
2.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes
1.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer
0.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source
61.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(48.8%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet
1.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette
6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
TPC Plan Target
(0.7%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes
1.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes
5.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes
5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)
Health / Weight Status
Health / Weight Status
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens who are Obese
County: Honolulu Teens who are Obese
14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens who are Overweight
County: Honolulu Teens who are Overweight
14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Honolulu Teens with a Healthy Body Weight
County: Honolulu Teens with a Healthy Body Weight
71.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(70.1% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Prior Value
(68.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(76.8%)
Community / Social Environment
Community / Social Environment
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To
County: Honolulu Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To
73.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(79.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>
County: Honolulu Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To
County: Honolulu Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To
75.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(74.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(79.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>
Economy / Food Insecurity
Economy / Food Insecurity
County: Honolulu
Value
Compared to:
County: Honolulu Teens Who Went Hungry
County: Honolulu Teens Who Went Hungry
4.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(4.6%)
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Went Hungry
County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Went Hungry
4.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(4.9%)
