Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:
15.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9%), Maui has a value of 15.7%.
HI Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Maui has a value of 15.7%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (15.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Attended a Childbirth Class During Last Pregnancy

19.2%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.5%), Maui has a value of 19.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.5%), Maui has a value of 19.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (19.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Babies with Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
8.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.4%), Maui has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Maui has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (8.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Babies with Very Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
0.9%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.3%), Maui has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.3% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Maui has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.9%).
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Birth Rate

10.2
Births per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.8), Maui has a value of 10.2.
HI Value
(10.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0), Maui has a value of 10.2.
US Value
(11.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0).
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Births Delivered by Cesarean Section

Current Value:
29.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.6%), Maui has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Maui has a value of 29.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (29.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.8%).
Prior Value
(29.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Births Delivered by Primary Cesarean Section

Current Value:
12.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.8%), Maui has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.6%), Maui has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Births to Mothers Under 18 Years

Current Value:
0.9%
% of births to mothers <18
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.6%), Maui has a value of 0.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Fetal Deaths

Current Value:

County: Maui Fetal Deaths

4.6
Deaths per 1,000 live births + fetal deaths
(2011-2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.4), Maui has a value of 4.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.4 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Maui has a value of 4.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.7 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.1).
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui HIV Test During Pregnancy

Current Value:
66.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.6%), Maui has a value of 66.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(62.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.2%), Maui has a value of 66.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(65.2% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (66.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (54.3%).
Prior Value
(54.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Households that Received Maternity Care Services

5.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.3%), Maui has a value of 5.4%.
HI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Maui has a value of 5.4%.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (5.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Infant Deaths Due to All Birth Defects

Current Value:
1.1
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.9), Maui has a value of 1.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.9 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1), Maui has a value of 1.1.
US Value
(1.1 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.7).
Prior Value
(0.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Infant Deaths Due to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)

0.6
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2006-2010)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.2), Maui has a value of 0.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.4), Maui has a value of 0.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.4 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.7).
Prior Value
(0.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Infant Deaths Due to Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths

1.8
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2001-2003)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.9), Maui has a value of 1.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.9), Maui has a value of 1.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.9 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (1.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.0).
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Infant Mortality Rate

4.6
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.5), Maui has a value of 4.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6), Maui has a value of 4.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.6 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1).
Prior Value
(5.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (5.0), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.0)
<div><span>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR) </strong><br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Maui Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Yrs Education

7.9%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.8%), Maui has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.1%), Maui has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Infants Still Breastfeeding at 8 Weeks

Current Value:
79.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.9%), Maui has a value of 79.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (68.5%), Maui has a value of 79.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(68.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (79.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.9%).
Prior Value
(80.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (94.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(94.4%)

County: Maui Infants Who Are Put to Sleep on Their Backs

Current Value:
79.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (83.0%), Maui has a value of 79.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (79.5%), Maui has a value of 79.5%.
US Value
(79.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (79.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.8%).
Prior Value
(70.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Mothers Who Ever Breastfed

Current Value:
95.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (94.5%), Maui has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.9%), Maui has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.9% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (95.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.1%).
Prior Value
(94.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

County: Maui Mothers Who Gained Appropriate Weight During Pregnancy

36.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.9%), Maui has a value of 36.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(36.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (36.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.1%).
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Mothers Who Had a Postpartum Care Visit

Current Value:
87.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (88.7%), Maui has a value of 87.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.1%), Maui has a value of 87.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.1% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (87.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.4%).
Prior Value
(84.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Mothers who Received Early and Adequate Prenatal Care

77.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.1%), Maui has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(62.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.1%), Maui has a value of 77.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.1% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (77.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.0%).
Prior Value
(77.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Mothers who Received Late or No Prenatal Care

Current Value:
4.6%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.4%), Maui has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Maui has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1%).
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Mothers Who Smoked 3-6 Months Postpartum

Current Value:
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.8%), Maui has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Maui has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Mothers Who Smoked in the Last Trimester of Pregnancy

4.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.7%), Maui has a value of 4.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.5%), Maui has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.2%).
Prior Value
(5.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Neonatal Mortality Rate

Current Value:
3.8
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.2), Maui has a value of 3.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.5), Maui has a value of 3.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (3.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.2).
Prior Value
(4.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Postpartum Relapse of Smoking

Current Value:
24.9%
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (31.3%), Maui has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(31.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (24.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.4%).
Prior Value
(32.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Pregnancies that Are Intended

Current Value:
51.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.6%), Maui has a value of 51.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (60.4%), Maui has a value of 51.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(60.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (51.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (51.8%).
Prior Value
(51.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.5%)
<div><span>FP-01: Reduce the proportion of unintended pregnancies<br /><br />The national indicator definition is limited to women aged 15-44 and uses live births as well as abortions and fetal losses for the denominator. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Maui Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist

Current Value:
45.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.6%), Maui has a value of 45.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (45.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.2%).
Prior Value
(49.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance

Current Value:
79.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.5%), Maui has a value of 79.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (79.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.2%).
Prior Value
(84.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (75.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(75.0%)
<div><span>AHS-02: Increase the proportion of people with dental insurance </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey.</span></div>

County: Maui Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Maui Preterm Births

8.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.8%), Maui has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Maui has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (8.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
<div><span>MICH-07: Reduce preterm births<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Maui Teen Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Maui Teen Birth Rate

11.9
Births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.7), Maui has a value of 11.9 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Maui has a value of 11.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (11.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.3).
Prior Value
(14.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women who Abstained from Alcohol in Their Third Trimester

88.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (92.6%), Maui has a value of 88.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(92.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (92.0%), Maui has a value of 88.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(92.0% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (88.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.4%).
Prior Value
(89.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.2%)
<div> <div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.healthypeople.gov/node/4836/data_details" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>MICH-09:  </span> <span>Increase abstinence from alcohol among pregnant women</span></a></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as the percent of pregnant females ages 15 to 44 years who report no alcohol use in the previous 30 days.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.</div> </div>

County: Maui Women Who Abstained from Drinking Prior to Pregnancy

45.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (43.5%), Maui has a value of 45.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(43.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (44.7%), Maui has a value of 45.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(44.7% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (45.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.1%).
Prior Value
(41.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Abstained from Illicit Drugs During Pregnancy

92.8%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (96.6%), Maui has a value of 92.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(96.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (92.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.6%).
Prior Value
(94.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Abstained from Illicit Drugs Prior to Pregnancy

91.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (94.6%), Maui has a value of 91.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (91.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.4%).
Prior Value
(88.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Abstained from Smoking Prior to Pregnancy

90.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (90.6%), Maui has a value of 90.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (86.0%), Maui has a value of 90.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (90.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.9%).
Prior Value
(86.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women who Binge Drink Prior to Pregnancy

Current Value:
19.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.3%), Maui has a value of 19.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Maui has a value of 19.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (19.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9%).
Prior Value
(22.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Discussed Effects of Smoking with a HCW

67.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (72.1%), Maui has a value of 67.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(72.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (67.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.2%).
Prior Value
(71.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Discussed Preconception Health with a HCW

38.6%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (40.7%), Maui has a value of 38.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Maui has a value of 38.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (38.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.5%).
Prior Value
(37.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Women Who Drank Alcohol in Their Third Trimester of Pregnancy

11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.4%), Maui has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (11.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Had a Healthy Body Weight Prior to Pregnancy

51.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (48.1%), Maui has a value of 51.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(48.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (43.0%), Maui has a value of 51.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (51.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.6%).
Prior Value
(47.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy

48.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.6%), Maui has a value of 48.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.0%), Maui has a value of 48.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(40.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (48.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.3%).
Prior Value
(45.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS

Current Value:
79.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.2%), Maui has a value of 79.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (79.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.9%).
Prior Value
(77.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Knew Oral Health Was Important During Pregnancy

82.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (88.4%), Maui has a value of 82.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (82.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.2%).
Prior Value
(84.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy

Current Value:
83.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (84.9%), Maui has a value of 83.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (83.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.0%).
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Quit Smoking Cigarettes During Pregnancy

83.3%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (66.6%), Maui has a value of 83.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(66.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (83.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.4%).
Prior Value
(76.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (24.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(24.4%)
<div> <div>TU-15: Increase successful quit attempts in pregnant women who smoke cigarettes </div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as the percent of females who reported smoking cigarettes <span>at any time during the first and/or second trimester and reported not smoking during the third trimester of their pregnancy</span>.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Vital Statistics System.  The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Maui Women Who Took Folic Acid or Vitamins Prior to Pregnancy

40.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.1%), Maui has a value of 40.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (43.6%), Maui has a value of 40.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.6% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (40.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.9%).
Prior Value
(40.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.4%), Maui has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy

Current Value:
50.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (47.4%), Maui has a value of 50.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(47.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (50.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.5%).
Prior Value
(50.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women with Depression Before Pregnancy

Current Value:
10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Maui has a value of 10.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Women with Post-Partum Depression

Current Value:
17.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.4%), Maui has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (17.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.2%).
Prior Value
(14.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.