Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

County: Maui

Value
Compared to:

County: Maui Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
95.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 95.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (93.7%), Maui has a value of 95.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(93.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.0%), Maui has a value of 95.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Maui Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Maui Access to Parks

47.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.6%), Maui has a value of 47.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (47.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (14.7%).
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Maui Adults Who Are Obese

24.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.9%), Maui has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (33.6%), Maui has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (24.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.3%).
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36%)
<div> <div>NWS-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition is for adults age 20+ and this indicator is for adults 18+. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (22.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(22.8%)

County: Maui Adults Who Are Sedentary

Current Value:
20.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Maui has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.5%), Maui has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (20.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
<div> <div>PA-01: Reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on performing 10 minutes of physical activity. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

Current Value:
17.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.8%), Maui has a value of 17.3%.
HI Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Maui has a value of 17.3%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (17.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.2%).
Prior Value
(17.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Current Value:
70.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.7%), Maui has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Maui has a value of 70.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (70.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.0%).
Prior Value
(60.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Maui Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

26.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.8%), Maui has a value of 26.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Maui has a value of 26.7% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (26.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)

County: Maui Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

62.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (56.0%), Maui has a value of 62.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Maui has a value of 62.2% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (62.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.2%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

41.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.3%), Maui has a value of 41.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (32.1%), Maui has a value of 41.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (41.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.3%).
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (40.3%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)

County: Maui Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

37.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Maui has a value of 37.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Maui has a value of 37.7% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (37.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.5%).
Prior Value
(37.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)

County: Maui Adults Who Regularly Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood

28.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.2%), Maui has a value of 28.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(27.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (28.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (28.2%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Maui Adults Who Walked or Biked in Their Neighborhood

54.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (55.3%), Maui has a value of 54.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (54.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.7%).
Prior Value
(58.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (60.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(60.3%)

County: Maui Adults Whose Neighborhood Supports Physical Activity

50.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (66.6%), Maui has a value of 50.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(66.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (50.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.8%).
Prior Value
(59.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (74.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(74.4%)

County: Maui Internet Usage

Current Value:

County: Maui Internet Usage

91.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Maui has a value of 91.8%.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.0%), Maui has a value of 91.8%.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (91.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (82.9%).
Prior Value
(82.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.2%), Maui has a value of 10.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Maui has a value of 10.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (10.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(39.0%)

County: Maui Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety

10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.5%), Maui has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.6%)

County: Maui Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

Current Value:
45.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.3%), Maui has a value of 45.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (45.3%), Maui has a value of 45.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (45.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.9%).
Prior Value
(38.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time

31.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.2%), Maui has a value of 31.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (31.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (24.4%).
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (37.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(37.3%)

County: Maui Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.7%), Maui has a value of 18.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (24.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(24.1%)
<div>PA-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. </div>

County: Maui Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (23.1%), Maui has a value of 23.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.9%), Maui has a value of 23.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.5%).
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)

County: Maui Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

46.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.5%), Maui has a value of 46.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(45.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (44.9%), Maui has a value of 46.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (46.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.2%).
Prior Value
(45.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(56.1%)

County: Maui Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School

Current Value:
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.4%), Maui has a value of 10.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.7%)

County: Maui Workers Commuting by Active Transportation

Current Value:
4.6%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.2%), Maui has a value of 4.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.8%).
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.1%)

County: Maui Workers Commuting by Bicycling

Current Value:
0.5%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Maui has a value of 0.5%.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (0.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.4%).
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (0.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(0.9%)

County: Maui Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.3%), Maui has a value of 1.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Maui has a value of 1.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
<div> <div>EH-02: Increase trips to work made by mass transit</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(5.3%)

County: Maui Workers Commuting by Walking

Current Value:
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Maui has a value of 2.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.2%), Maui has a value of 2.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Maui has a value of 2.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (4.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(4.8%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.3%), Maui has a value of 7.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (10.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(10.1%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Do Not Walk or Bike to School Due to Safety

18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.6%), Maui has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (16.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(16.0%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

44.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (43.8%), Maui has a value of 44.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(43.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (44.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.5%).
Prior Value
(47.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Young Teens Who Have Physical Activity Breaks During Class Time

41.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.9%), Maui has a value of 41.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (41.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (34.7%).
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (48.9%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(48.9%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

20.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.0%), Maui has a value of 20.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (20.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.2%).
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Maui Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

27.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (26.0%), Maui has a value of 27.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (27.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.2%).
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (26.6%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

49.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.0%), Maui has a value of 49.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (49.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.3%).
Prior Value
(48.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (48.8%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(48.8%)

County: Maui Young Teens Who Walk, Wheelchair, or Bike to School

10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.0%), Maui has a value of 10.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (14.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(14.2%)