Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adult Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
8.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.5%), Honolulu has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (12.4%), Honolulu has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline

Current Value:
71.6
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.3), Honolulu has a value of 71.6 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(71.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (71.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.9).
Prior Value
(72.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (81), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(81)

County: Honolulu Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Happy with Weight

51.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.4%), Honolulu has a value of 51.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Honolulu has a value of 51.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (51.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (58.7%).
Prior Value
(58.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

76.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 76.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (75.5%), Honolulu has a value of 76.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Honolulu has a value of 76.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (76.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (84.7%).
Prior Value
(84.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

Current Value:
20.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.8%), Honolulu has a value of 20.4%.
HI Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Honolulu has a value of 20.4%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (20.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (19.9%).
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Binge Drink

18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.2%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (16.9%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (25.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(25.4%)
<div>SU-10: Reduce the proportion of people aged 21 years and over who engaged in binge drinking in the past month <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator includes persons aged 21 and over.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source but includes adults 18 years and older.</div>

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Excessively

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Excessively

19.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Honolulu has a value of 19.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults who Ever Used an Electronic Smoking Device

Current Value:
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.0%), Honolulu has a value of 34.0%.
HI Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (28.0%), Honolulu has a value of 34.0% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.7%).
Prior Value
(24.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults who Feel Life is Slipping Out of Control

Current Value:
24.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.7%), Honolulu has a value of 24.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Honolulu has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.7%).
Prior Value
(30.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Current Value:
72.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.7%), Honolulu has a value of 72.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Honolulu has a value of 72.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (72.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.1%).
Prior Value
(66.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
24.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Honolulu Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home

Current Value:
79.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.0%), Honolulu has a value of 79.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.0%), Honolulu has a value of 79.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (79.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (77.1%).
Prior Value
(77.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days

39.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 39.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (38.3%), Honolulu has a value of 39.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.4%), Honolulu has a value of 39.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (39.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.4%).
Prior Value
(39.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Get Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:
47.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.6%), Honolulu has a value of 47.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(45.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (47.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.6%).
Prior Value
(40.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4%)
<div>SH-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as adults who get an average of at least 7 hours of sleep. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source, but is the inverse, people who get fewer than 7 hours of sleep on average. The HP 2030 target has been adjusted accordingly.</span></div> <div> </div>

County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

24.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.8%), Honolulu has a value of 24.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Honolulu has a value of 24.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.2%).
Prior Value
(24.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

54.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (56.0%), Honolulu has a value of 54.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Honolulu has a value of 54.4% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (54.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.4%).
Prior Value
(55.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

34.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.3%), Honolulu has a value of 34.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (32.1%), Honolulu has a value of 34.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.7%).
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (40.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

Current Value:
38.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Honolulu has a value of 38.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Honolulu has a value of 38.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (38.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

9.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Honolulu has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.5%), Honolulu has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(6.1%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Use an Electronic Smoking Device

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.8%), Honolulu has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Honolulu has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (2.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(2.3%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.8%), Honolulu has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.6%), Honolulu has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (4.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Good Physical and Mental Health

Current Value:
51.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.3%), Honolulu has a value of 51.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.6%), Honolulu has a value of 51.1% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.6% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (51.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.1%).
Prior Value
(57.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Health Status of Good or Better

Current Value:
86.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.0%), Honolulu has a value of 86.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (83.0%), Honolulu has a value of 86.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(83.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (86.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.5%).
Prior Value
(88.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Honolulu Adults with High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
29.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (29.8%), Honolulu has a value of 29.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.1%), Honolulu has a value of 29.6% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (29.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.6%)
<div>HDS-04: Reduce the proportion of adults with high blood pressure<br /> <br />The national indicator excludes pregnant women. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div>

County: Honolulu Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

Current Value:
32.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.2%), Honolulu has a value of 32.1%.
HI Value
(33.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Honolulu has a value of 32.1%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (32.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

Current Value:
44.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Honolulu has a value of 44.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (44.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.2%).
Prior Value
(40.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

County: Honolulu Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Life Expectancy

82.4
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 82.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (82.3), Honolulu has a value of 82.4 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(82.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.5), Honolulu has a value of 82.4 which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (82.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.5).
Prior Value
(82.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

88.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 88.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (87.7%), Honolulu has a value of 88.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(87.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Honolulu has a value of 88.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (88.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (97.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(97.7%)

County: Honolulu Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Honolulu has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Honolulu Sexual Minority Adults

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Sexual Minority Adults

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Honolulu has a value of 6.0%.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Sexual or Gender Minority Adults

Current Value:
6.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Honolulu has a value of 6.4%.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
21.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (23.5%), Honolulu has a value of 21.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Honolulu has a value of 21.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (21.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.9%).
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of high school students in grades who get enough sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Honolulu Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

57.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.2%), Honolulu has a value of 57.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.9%), Honolulu has a value of 57.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (57.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.2%).
Prior Value
(59.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)

County: Honolulu Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
83.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.9%), Honolulu has a value of 83.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(82.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (80.2%), Honolulu has a value of 83.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (83.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.8%).
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (73.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
45.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.1%), Honolulu has a value of 45.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(46.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (45.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.5%).
Prior Value
(44.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of students in grades 9 through 12 who get sufficient sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. There is no national middle school survey for students in grades 6-8; however, Hawaiʻi has additional data for this indicator. </span></div> </div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

49.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.3%), Honolulu has a value of 49.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (49.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.9%).
Prior Value
(55.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
76.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.2%), Honolulu has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (76.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.3%).
Prior Value
(76.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (86.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)