Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Binge Drink

18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.2%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (16.9%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (25.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(25.4%)
<div>SU-10: Reduce the proportion of people aged 21 years and over who engaged in binge drinking in the past month <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator includes persons aged 21 and over.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source but includes adults 18 years and older.</div>

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Alcohol

49.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.1%), Honolulu has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (53.4%), Honolulu has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(53.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (49.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.4%).
Prior Value
(48.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink and Drive

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink and Drive

2.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.9%), Honolulu has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (2.3%), Honolulu has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.1%).
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Excessively

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Excessively

19.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Honolulu has a value of 19.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Heavily

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Heavily

7.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.1%), Honolulu has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.8%), Honolulu has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Grew Up with Drug Use in Household

Current Value:
10.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Honolulu has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Grew Up with Problem Drinking in Household

17.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.4%), Honolulu has a value of 17.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.6%).
Prior Value
(17.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Marijuana

8.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Honolulu has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Smokeless Tobacco

Current Value:
2.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Honolulu has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.4%), Honolulu has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.8%)

County: Honolulu Adults with 4+ Adverse Childhood Experiences

Current Value:
13.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.3%), Honolulu has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Alcohol Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
23.1
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.3), Honolulu has a value of 23.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(27.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
26.3%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,115 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (31.5%), Honolulu has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(31.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.0%), Honolulu has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (26.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.5%).
Prior Value
(24.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults Who Drink Excessively

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.8%), Honolulu has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.0%)

County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Depression

Current Value:
17.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.7%), Honolulu has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.5%)

County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Low Educational Attainment

28.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.6%), Honolulu has a value of 28.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(24.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (28.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.9%).
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Adults with Poor Mental Health

21.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.3%), Honolulu has a value of 21.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (21.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.5%).
Prior Value
(20.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (9.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(9.3%)

County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among LGBT Adults

Current Value:
11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Honolulu has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.1%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.1%)

County: Honolulu Cigarette Smoking among Native Hawaiian Adults

Current Value:
17.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4%), Honolulu has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.3%)

County: Honolulu Cirrhosis Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cirrhosis Death Rate

6.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.4), Honolulu has a value of 6.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.4 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.5), Honolulu has a value of 6.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5).
Prior Value
(6.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.9)
<div> <div>SU-02: Reduce cirrhosis deaths</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:
17.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 17.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.1), Honolulu has a value of 17.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Honolulu has a value of 17.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.8).
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (13.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(13.1)
<div>IVP-20: Reduce overdose deaths involving opioids</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Honolulu Drug Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Drug Overdose Death Rate

17.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.7), Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.7 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.4).
Prior Value
(17.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(20.7)
<div> <div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div><strong></strong></div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Drug Use Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
101.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (105.2), Honolulu has a value of 101.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(105.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

1.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2%), Honolulu has a value of 1.3%.
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Honolulu has a value of 1.3%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Illegal Drugs on School Property HS

Current Value:
25.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Honolulu has a value of 25.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Honolulu has a value of 25.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.7%)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (25.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.7%).
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Illegal Drugs on School Property MS

Current Value:
8.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Honolulu has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs

Current Value:
34.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.6%), Honolulu has a value of 34.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Honolulu has a value of 34.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.9%).
Prior Value
(41.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-07: Reduce the proportion of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students who have used illicit drugs<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Liquor Store Density

5.0
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 5.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.2), Honolulu has a value of 5.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Honolulu has a value of 5.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.7).
Prior Value
(4.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.8), Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0).
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Honolulu Proportion of Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths Involving a Drunk Driver

18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.2%), Honolulu has a value of 18.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.1%).
Prior Value
(32.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (28.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(28.3%)
<div> <div>SU-11: Reduce the proportion of motor vehicle crash deaths that involve a drunk driver</div> <div> </div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;">The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Honolulu Teen Boys Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teen Boys Who Binge Drink

10.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.3%), Honolulu has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Honolulu has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for boys, while 'Teen Girls Who Binge Drink' presents the data for girls.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Teen Girls Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teen Girls Who Binge Drink

9.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.4%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.8%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.8% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for girls, while 'Teen Boys Who Binge Drink' presents the data for boys.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Binge Drink

7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.3%), Honolulu has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Honolulu has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. Binge drinking is defined the same in the YRBS and NSDUH for high school students in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Teens Who Ever Used illicit drugs

Current Value:
24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.8%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.3%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.3%), Honolulu has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), Honolulu has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.8%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
1.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Honolulu has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Honolulu has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.4%).
Prior Value
(4.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.9%).
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Alcohol

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.6%), Honolulu has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Honolulu has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Honolulu has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Honolulu has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Marijuana

9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.0%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Unintentional Poisoning-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
84.9
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (84.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (81.0).
Prior Value
(81.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women who Abstained from Alcohol in Their Third Trimester

93.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (92.6%), Honolulu has a value of 93.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(92.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (92.0%), Honolulu has a value of 93.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(92.0% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (93.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.4%).
Prior Value
(94.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.2%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.2%)
<div> <div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.healthypeople.gov/node/4836/data_details" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>MICH-09:  </span> <span>Increase abstinence from alcohol among pregnant women</span></a></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as the percent of pregnant females ages 15 to 44 years who report no alcohol use in the previous 30 days.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Women Who Abstained from Drinking Prior to Pregnancy

42.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (43.5%), Honolulu has a value of 42.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(43.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (44.7%), Honolulu has a value of 42.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(44.7% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (42.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.7%).
Prior Value
(44.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women Who Abstained from Illicit Drugs During Pregnancy

97.8%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (96.6%), Honolulu has a value of 97.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(96.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (97.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (98.2%).
Prior Value
(98.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women Who Abstained from Illicit Drugs Prior to Pregnancy

95.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (94.6%), Honolulu has a value of 95.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (95.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.7%).
Prior Value
(96.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women who Binge Drink Prior to Pregnancy

Current Value:
19.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.3%), Honolulu has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Honolulu has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.6%).
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women Who Drank Alcohol in Their Third Trimester of Pregnancy

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.4%), Honolulu has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women Who Quit Smoking Cigarettes During Pregnancy

Current Value:
59.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (61.1%), Honolulu has a value of 59.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(61.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (59.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (73.9%).
Prior Value
(73.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (24.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(24.4%)
<div> <div>TU-15: Increase successful quit attempts in pregnant women who smoke cigarettes </div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as the percent of females who reported smoking cigarettes <span>at any time during the first and/or second trimester and reported not smoking during the third trimester of their pregnancy</span>.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Vital Statistics System.  The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Binge Drink

1.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Honolulu has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator includes adolescents ages 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. However, binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks on one occasional for girls and 5 or more drinks for boys in the NSDUH, but only as 5 or more drinks for boys or girls in this indicator for middle school students grades 6-8. </div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Honolulu has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.1%).
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
1.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Honolulu has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.7%).
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.1%), Honolulu has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.7%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
1.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.7%), Honolulu has a value of 1.7%.
HI Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Alcohol

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Honolulu has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.5%).
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Honolulu has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.8%), Honolulu has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>