Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Adolescent Health

Health / Adolescent Health

Health / Adolescent Health

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Adolescent Health

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Intimate Partner Violence Among Teens

Current Value:
5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.9%), Honolulu has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Honolulu has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.3%).
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Teens

Current Value:
6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.1%), Honolulu has a value of 6.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3%).
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu LGB Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:

County: Honolulu LGB Teens Who Are Bullied

14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.3%), Honolulu has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Honolulu has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-05: Reduce bullying of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Honolulu LGB Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
39.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (39.1%), Honolulu has a value of 39.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(39.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (46.8%), Honolulu has a value of 39.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(46.8% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (39.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-06: Reduce suicidal thoughts in lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition includes making a plan or attempting suicide in the past 12 months. The data source is the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Honolulu LGB Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
54.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (52.4%), Honolulu has a value of 54.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Are Bullied

8.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.5%), Honolulu has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.0%), Honolulu has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

10.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Honolulu has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Honolulu has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Ever Used illicit drugs

Current Value:
24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.8%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need

Current Value:
19.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.1%), Honolulu has a value of 19.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.4%).
Prior Value
(21.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
21.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (23.5%), Honolulu has a value of 21.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Honolulu has a value of 21.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (21.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.9%).
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of high school students in grades who get enough sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Honolulu Teens Who Skipped School for Safety

Current Value:
7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.6%), Honolulu has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), Honolulu has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.4%).
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

57.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.2%), Honolulu has a value of 57.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.9%), Honolulu has a value of 57.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (57.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.2%).
Prior Value
(59.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)

County: Honolulu Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
83.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.9%), Honolulu has a value of 83.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(82.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (80.2%), Honolulu has a value of 83.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (83.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.8%).
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (73.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)

County: Honolulu Teens with Recent Depression

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens with Recent Depression

34.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.8%), Honolulu has a value of 34.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.3%), Honolulu has a value of 34.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.3%).
Prior Value
(34.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.6%), Honolulu has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.2%), Honolulu has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.9%).
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Are Bullied

33.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.5%), Honolulu has a value of 33.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (33.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.1%).
Prior Value
(34.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

Current Value:
27.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.7%), Honolulu has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (27.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.7%).
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need

Current Value:
22.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (22.8%), Honolulu has a value of 22.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(22.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (22.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.6%).
Prior Value
(25.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
45.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.1%), Honolulu has a value of 45.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(46.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (45.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.5%).
Prior Value
(44.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of students in grades 9 through 12 who get sufficient sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. There is no national middle school survey for students in grades 6-8; however, Hawaiʻi has additional data for this indicator. </span></div> </div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Skipped School for Safety

Current Value:
7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.9%), Honolulu has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

49.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.3%), Honolulu has a value of 49.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (49.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.9%).
Prior Value
(55.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
76.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.2%), Honolulu has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (76.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.3%).
Prior Value
(76.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (86.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens with Ever Depression

Current Value:
34.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4%), Honolulu has a value of 34.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.1%).
Prior Value
(30.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
28.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (26.9%), Honolulu has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (28.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Binge Drink

18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.2%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (16.9%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (25.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(25.4%)
<div>SU-10: Reduce the proportion of people aged 21 years and over who engaged in binge drinking in the past month <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator includes persons aged 21 and over.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source but includes adults 18 years and older.</div>

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Alcohol

49.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.1%), Honolulu has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (53.4%), Honolulu has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(53.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (49.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.4%).
Prior Value
(48.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink and Drive

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink and Drive

2.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.9%), Honolulu has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (2.3%), Honolulu has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.1%).
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Excessively

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Excessively

19.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Honolulu has a value of 19.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Heavily

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Drink Heavily

7.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.1%), Honolulu has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.8%), Honolulu has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Use Marijuana

8.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Honolulu has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Alcohol Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
23.1
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.3), Honolulu has a value of 23.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(27.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Cirrhosis Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cirrhosis Death Rate

6.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.4), Honolulu has a value of 6.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.4 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.5), Honolulu has a value of 6.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5).
Prior Value
(6.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.9)
<div> <div>SU-02: Reduce cirrhosis deaths</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:
17.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 17.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.1), Honolulu has a value of 17.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Honolulu has a value of 17.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.8).
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (13.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(13.1)
<div>IVP-20: Reduce overdose deaths involving opioids</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Honolulu Drug Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Drug Overdose Death Rate

17.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.7), Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.7 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.4).
Prior Value
(17.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(20.7)
<div> <div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div><strong></strong></div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Drug Use Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
101.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (105.2), Honolulu has a value of 101.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(105.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

1.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2%), Honolulu has a value of 1.3%.
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Honolulu has a value of 1.3%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Illegal Drugs on School Property HS

Current Value:
25.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Honolulu has a value of 25.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Honolulu has a value of 25.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.7%)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (25.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.7%).
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Illegal Drugs on School Property MS

Current Value:
8.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Honolulu has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs

Current Value:
34.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.6%), Honolulu has a value of 34.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.2%), Honolulu has a value of 34.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.9%).
Prior Value
(41.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-07: Reduce the proportion of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students who have used illicit drugs<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Proportion of Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths Involving a Drunk Driver

18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.2%), Honolulu has a value of 18.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.1%).
Prior Value
(32.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (28.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(28.3%)
<div> <div>SU-11: Reduce the proportion of motor vehicle crash deaths that involve a drunk driver</div> <div> </div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;">The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Honolulu Teen Boys Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teen Boys Who Binge Drink

10.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.3%), Honolulu has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Honolulu has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for boys, while 'Teen Girls Who Binge Drink' presents the data for girls.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Teen Girls Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teen Girls Who Binge Drink

9.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.4%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.8%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.8% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for girls, while 'Teen Boys Who Binge Drink' presents the data for boys.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Binge Drink

7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.3%), Honolulu has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Honolulu has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. Binge drinking is defined the same in the YRBS and NSDUH for high school students in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
1.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Honolulu has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Honolulu has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.4%).
Prior Value
(4.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Alcohol

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.6%), Honolulu has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Honolulu has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Marijuana

9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.0%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Honolulu has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Binge Drink

1.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Honolulu has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator includes adolescents ages 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. However, binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks on one occasional for girls and 5 or more drinks for boys in the NSDUH, but only as 5 or more drinks for boys or girls in this indicator for middle school students grades 6-8. </div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
1.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.7%), Honolulu has a value of 1.7%.
HI Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Alcohol

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Honolulu has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.5%).
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.8%), Honolulu has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Had Cancer

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Had Cancer

6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Honolulu has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.5%), Honolulu has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (5.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(5.2%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.8%), Honolulu has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.6%), Honolulu has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (4.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Hepatitis B Vaccines

Current Value:
41.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Honolulu has a value of 41.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (41.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.8%).
Prior Value
(40.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (44.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(44.7%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Sunburns, past year

Current Value:
31.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.2%), Honolulu has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (31.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.4%).
Prior Value
(27.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (33.1%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(33.1%)

County: Honolulu All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu All Cancer Incidence Rate

422.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 422.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (413.9), Honolulu has a value of 422.3 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(413.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Honolulu has a value of 422.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (422.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (424.7).
Prior Value
(424.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
13.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 13.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,001 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Honolulu has a value of 13.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.9), Honolulu has a value of 13.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (13.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3).
Prior Value
(13.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

3.9
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.3), Honolulu has a value of 3.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4), Honolulu has a value of 3.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (3.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8).
Prior Value
(3.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Death Rate

16.1
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.1), Honolulu has a value of 16.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(18.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Honolulu has a value of 16.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2).
Prior Value
(16.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
<div> <div>C-04: Reduce the female breast cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

147.1
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 147.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (140.2), Honolulu has a value of 147.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(140.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Honolulu has a value of 147.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (147.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (146.7).
Prior Value
(146.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (122.8), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(122.8)

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Screening

79.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.5%), Honolulu has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(78.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.3%), Honolulu has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (79.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.4%).
Prior Value
(83.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (92.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(92.1%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div> <div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cancer Death Rate

114.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (118.2), Honolulu has a value of 114.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(118.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (146.4), Honolulu has a value of 114.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (114.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (114.5).
Prior Value
(114.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (107.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(107.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-1:  </span></span><span>Reduce the overall cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors Who Have Obesity

Current Value:
20.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Honolulu has a value of 20.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (20.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (19.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(19.5%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors Who Smoke Cigarettes or E-cigarettes

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Honolulu has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3%).
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.6%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.6%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors with a Survivorship Care Plan

Current Value:
29.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.5%), Honolulu has a value of 29.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (29.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.5%).
Prior Value
(36.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (30.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(30.5%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors with a Written Treatment Summary

Current Value:
54.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (52.7%), Honolulu has a value of 54.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (54.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (51.1%).
Prior Value
(51.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (59.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(59.7%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors with an Advance Directive

Current Value:
67.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (65.8%), Honolulu has a value of 67.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(65.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (67.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (65.9%).
Prior Value
(65.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (70.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(70.5%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors with Instructions for Follow Up Care

79.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.1%), Honolulu has a value of 79.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (79.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.4%).
Prior Value
(80.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (82.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(82.8%)

County: Honolulu Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cancer: Medicare Population

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (11.0%), Honolulu has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Honolulu has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Death Rate

1.7
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0), Honolulu has a value of 1.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.0 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.3), Honolulu has a value of 1.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.3 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.6).
Prior Value
(1.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.4)

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
7.0
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.9), Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7).
Prior Value
(6.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (6.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(6.1)

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Screening

80.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.2%), Honolulu has a value of 80.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (80.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (88.3%).
Prior Value
(88.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(84.3%)
<div> <div>C-09: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer.<br /> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
17.2
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 721 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.5), Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5).
Prior Value
(17.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
73.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 73.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Honolulu has a value of 73.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

11.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.1), Honolulu has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Honolulu has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.7).
Prior Value
(11.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.9)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div> <div>C-06: Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
39.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 39.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (38.8), Honolulu has a value of 39.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Honolulu has a value of 39.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (39.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.1).
Prior Value
(40.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (35.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(35.3)

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Screening

77.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (77.1%), Honolulu has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(77.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (74.2%), Honolulu has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (77.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.5%).
Prior Value
(77.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.8%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (74.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div> <div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
63.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (64.9%), Honolulu has a value of 63.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(64.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (63.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.7%).
Prior Value
(67.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

Current Value:
8.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.0%), Honolulu has a value of 8.6%.
HI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Honolulu has a value of 8.6%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Honolulu Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.8), Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0).
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Honolulu Liver or Bile Duct Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
7.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.2), Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.2 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7), Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.8).
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Honolulu Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
43.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 43.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (41.7), Honolulu has a value of 43.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(41.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Honolulu has a value of 43.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (43.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.7).
Prior Value
(44.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (38.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(38.3)

County: Honolulu Lung Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Lung Cancer Death Rate

21.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.9), Honolulu has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.7), Honolulu has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (21.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.2).
Prior Value
(23.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.3)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-02:  </span></span><span>Reduce the lung cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Lung Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Lung Cancer Screening

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Honolulu has a value of 15.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (9.7%), Honolulu has a value of 15.4% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(9.7% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (12.3%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(12.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (7.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(7.5%)
<div><span>C-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for lung cancer </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in differently as adults 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit in the last 15 years. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
46.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (44.0%), Honolulu has a value of 46.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Honolulu has a value of 46.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (46.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (44.0%).
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Melanoma Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Melanoma Cancer Death Rate

0.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2), Honolulu has a value of 0.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.0), Honolulu has a value of 0.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.9).
Prior Value
(0.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.1), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.1)

County: Honolulu Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Melanoma Incidence Rate

19.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 19.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (24.4), Honolulu has a value of 19.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(24.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5), Honolulu has a value of 19.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.2).
Prior Value
(19.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.2), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.2)

County: Honolulu Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

25.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Honolulu has a value of 25.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (31.8%), Honolulu has a value of 25.5% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(31.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (25.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.5%).
Prior Value
(25.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (27.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(27.9%)

County: Honolulu Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor

Current Value:
15.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.7%), Honolulu has a value of 15.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6%).
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (16.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(16.2%)

County: Honolulu Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
15.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 15.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,912 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (14.9), Honolulu has a value of 15.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6), Honolulu has a value of 15.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.5).
Prior Value
(15.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
12.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 12.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.0), Honolulu has a value of 12.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Honolulu has a value of 12.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.4).
Prior Value
(12.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Oropharyngeal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.7), Honolulu has a value of 2.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.7 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7), Honolulu has a value of 2.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0).
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (2.6), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(2.6)

County: Honolulu Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.4
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 9.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 908 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.2), Honolulu has a value of 9.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.1), Honolulu has a value of 9.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5).
Prior Value
(9.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 14.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,733 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Honolulu has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2), Honolulu has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9).
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Prostate Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Prostate Cancer Death Rate

14.8
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9), Honolulu has a value of 14.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Honolulu has a value of 14.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7).
Prior Value
(13.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (15.0), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(15.0)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-08:  </span></span><span>Reduce the prostate cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
109.6
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 109.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (101.1), Honolulu has a value of 109.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(101.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Honolulu has a value of 109.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (109.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (110.1).
Prior Value
(110.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.1)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Sunscreen

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.1%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.5%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3%).
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)

County: Honolulu Uterine Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
36.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4), Honolulu has a value of 36.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.4), Honolulu has a value of 36.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (36.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.7).
Prior Value
(35.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test

Current Value:
76.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.1%), Honolulu has a value of 76.1%.
HI Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (77.7%), Honolulu has a value of 76.1% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (76.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (84.3%).
Prior Value
(84.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (83.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(83.7%)

County: Honolulu Women 30-65 Who Had an HPV Test

Current Value:
46.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.8%), Honolulu has a value of 46.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (46.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.1%).
Prior Value
(49.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (49.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(49.3%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:
14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Honolulu has a value of 14.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.9%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes

Current Value:
9.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.2%), Honolulu has a value of 9.4%.
HI Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7%), Honolulu has a value of 9.4%.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with a Diabetes Self-Management Plan

Current Value:
62.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.9%), Honolulu has a value of 62.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (62.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (64.0%).
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (69.8%), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(69.8%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults with Diabetes

11.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.7%), Honolulu has a value of 11.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.6%), Honolulu has a value of 11.8% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with New Cases of Diabetes

Current Value:
8.8
New cases per 1,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.7), Honolulu has a value of 8.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3), Honolulu has a value of 8.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8).
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (4.8), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(4.8)
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (4.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(4.8)
<div><span>D-01:  Reduce the number of diabetes cases diagnosed yearly <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes adults aged 18-84.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the US Diabetes Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Adults with Prediabetes

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults with Prediabetes

15.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.0%), Honolulu has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Diabetes Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Diabetes Death Rate

16.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.0), Honolulu has a value of 16.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(17.0 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.4), Honolulu has a value of 16.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.9).
Prior Value
(15.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Diabetes Death Rate (Multiple Cause of Death)

Current Value:
62.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.2), Honolulu has a value of 62.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(62.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (93.6), Honolulu has a value of 62.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(93.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (62.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (53.6).
Prior Value
(53.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (56.0), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(56.0)

County: Honolulu Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (27.0%), Honolulu has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Honolulu has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (29.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.0%).
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu High Risk Adults Tested for Diabetes

Current Value:
87.6
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.9), Honolulu has a value of 87.6 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(86.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (87.6) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.9).
Prior Value
(52.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (67.5), the target has  been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(67.5)

County: Honolulu Hospitalization for Diabetes among Adults 65+

Current Value:
302.3
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (282.1), Honolulu has a value of 302.3 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(282.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (302.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (250.7).
Prior Value
(250.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (264), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(264)
<div><span>OA-05: Reduce the rate of hospital admissions for diabetes among older adults<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indictor is the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The state data source is Laulima, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults with a Cognitive Disability

Current Value:
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Honolulu has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.4%), Honolulu has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults with a Disability

22.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.1%), Honolulu has a value of 22.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(24.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (27.6%), Honolulu has a value of 22.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(27.6% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (22.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.4%).
Prior Value
(21.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with a Self-Care Disability

Current Value:
2.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.2%), Honolulu has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.5%), Honolulu has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with a Vision Disability

Current Value:
3.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.0%), Honolulu has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (5.3%), Honolulu has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Activity Limitations due to Arthritis

Current Value:
34.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.5%), Honolulu has a value of 34.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(35.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.4%), Honolulu has a value of 34.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (34.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.9%).
Prior Value
(31.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (38.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(38.7%)
<div><span>A-02:  Reduce the proportion of adults with arthritis whose arthritis limits their activities<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Adults with an Ambulatory Disability

Current Value:
10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.7%), Honolulu has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.3%), Honolulu has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with an Independent Living Disability

Current Value:
5.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Honolulu has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Honolulu has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 19.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Honolulu has a value of 19.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Honolulu has a value of 19.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Work Limitations due to Arthritis

Current Value:
26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.9%), Honolulu has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.9%), Honolulu has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.3%).
Prior Value
(29.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (34.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(34.7%)
<div><span>A-03:  Reduce the proportion of adults with arthritis whose arthritis limits their work<br /> <br />The national indicator is limited to adults aged 18-64.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Children with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Children with a Disability

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.4%), Honolulu has a value of 3.1%.
HI Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Honolulu has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.9%), Honolulu has a value of 4.7%.
HI Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Honolulu has a value of 4.7%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Persons with a Disability

11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.0%), Honolulu has a value of 11.7%.
HI Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Honolulu has a value of 11.7%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.8%), Honolulu has a value of 3.7%.
HI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Honolulu has a value of 3.7%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.5%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5%.
HI Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0%), Honolulu has a value of 1.8%.
HI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Honolulu has a value of 1.8%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Honolulu has a value of 6.4%.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Honolulu has a value of 6.4%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Family Planning

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys

82.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.4%), Honolulu has a value of 82.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.7%), Honolulu has a value of 82.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (82.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.1%).
Prior Value
(78.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls

82.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.0%), Honolulu has a value of 82.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (69.4%), Honolulu has a value of 82.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (82.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.0%).
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys

Current Value:
96.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (96.4%), Honolulu has a value of 96.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (96.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.1%).
Prior Value
(94.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls

Current Value:
95.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (95.1%), Honolulu has a value of 95.1%.
HI Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (95.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.2%).
Prior Value
(94.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Births to Mothers Under 18 Years

Current Value:
0.6%
% of births to mothers <18
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.6%), Honolulu has a value of 0.6%.
HI Value
(0.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.7%).
Prior Value
(0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Condom Use Among Teen Boys

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Condom Use Among Teen Boys

41.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (48.3%), Honolulu has a value of 41.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(48.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (60.0%), Honolulu has a value of 41.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (41.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.4%).
Prior Value
(39.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (81.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(81.3%)
<div> <p>FP-06: Increase the proportion of adolescent males who used a condom the last time they had sex</p> <p>The national indicator is defined differently as it is for adolescents aged 15-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawai‘i cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.</p> </div>

County: Honolulu Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Yrs Education

Current Value:
18.4%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.8%), Honolulu has a value of 18.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.1%), Honolulu has a value of 18.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Pregnancies Among Females Aged 15-19 Years

Current Value:
16.4
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4), Honolulu has a value of 16.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(17.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Honolulu has a value of 16.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.4).
Prior Value
(17.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
<div><span>FP-03:  Reduce pregnancies in adolescents<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Pregnancies that Are Intended

Current Value:
59.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.6%), Honolulu has a value of 59.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (60.4%), Honolulu has a value of 59.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(60.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (59.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.5%)
<div><span>FP-01: Reduce the proportion of unintended pregnancies<br /><br />The national indicator definition is limited to women aged 15-44 and uses live births as well as abortions and fetal losses for the denominator. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Teen Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teen Birth Rate

10.7
Births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.7), Honolulu has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Honolulu has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2).
Prior Value
(11.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teen Girls at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

57.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.4%), Honolulu has a value of 57.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.8%), Honolulu has a value of 57.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (57.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.8%)
<div><span>FP-05: Increase the proportion of adolescent females at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of high school students, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

49.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.7%), Honolulu has a value of 49.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (49.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.6%).
Prior Value
(55.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.1%)
<div><span>FP-10: Increase the proportion of women at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator only includes most effective or moderately effective methods of contraception and is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Did Not See a Doctor Due to Cost

Current Value:
5.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Honolulu has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.1%), Honolulu has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.9%).
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups

Current Value:
77.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.6%), Honolulu has a value of 77.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(78.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (74.2%), Honolulu has a value of 77.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (77.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81.7%).
Prior Value
(81.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
78.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.8%), Honolulu has a value of 78.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (75.5%), Honolulu has a value of 78.2% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(75.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (78.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.5%).
Prior Value
(75.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
90.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (88.4%), Honolulu has a value of 90.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.8%), Honolulu has a value of 90.2% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (90.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.5%).
Prior Value
(90.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (83.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(83.9%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Health Insurance: 18+

Current Value:
90.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Honolulu has a value of 90.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.9%), Honolulu has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (90.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (93.9%).
Prior Value
(93.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with HMO Health Insurance

Current Value:
18.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.0%), Honolulu has a value of 18.9%.
HI Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.2%), Honolulu has a value of 18.9%.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.9%).
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance

Current Value:
8.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.7%), Honolulu has a value of 8.8%.
HI Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9%), Honolulu has a value of 8.8%.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Medicare Health Insurance

Current Value:
18.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.4%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3%.
HI Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3%.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (19.5%).
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Military Health Insurance

Current Value:
3.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.4%), Honolulu has a value of 3.7%.
HI Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Honolulu has a value of 3.7%.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (3.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Other Health Insurance

Current Value:
5.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8%.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.2%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with POS Health Insurance

Current Value:
2.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Honolulu has a value of 2.1%.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.9%), Honolulu has a value of 2.1%.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with PPO Health Insurance

Current Value:
37.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.1%), Honolulu has a value of 37.0%.
HI Value
(36.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.9%), Honolulu has a value of 37.0%.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (37.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (37.7%).
Prior Value
(37.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.