Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Family Planning

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys

82.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.4%), Honolulu has a value of 82.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.7%), Honolulu has a value of 82.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (82.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.1%).
Prior Value
(78.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls

82.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.0%), Honolulu has a value of 82.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (69.4%), Honolulu has a value of 82.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (82.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.0%).
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys

Current Value:
96.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (96.4%), Honolulu has a value of 96.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (96.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.1%).
Prior Value
(94.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls

Current Value:
95.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (95.1%), Honolulu has a value of 95.1%.
HI Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (95.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.2%).
Prior Value
(94.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Births to Mothers Under 18 Years

Current Value:
0.6%
% of births to mothers <18
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.6%), Honolulu has a value of 0.6%.
HI Value
(0.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.7%).
Prior Value
(0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Condom Use Among Teen Boys

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Condom Use Among Teen Boys

41.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (48.3%), Honolulu has a value of 41.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(48.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (60.0%), Honolulu has a value of 41.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (41.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.4%).
Prior Value
(39.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (81.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(81.3%)
<div> <p>FP-06: Increase the proportion of adolescent males who used a condom the last time they had sex</p> <p>The national indicator is defined differently as it is for adolescents aged 15-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawai‘i cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.</p> </div>

County: Honolulu Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Yrs Education

Current Value:
18.4%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.8%), Honolulu has a value of 18.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.1%), Honolulu has a value of 18.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Pregnancies Among Females Aged 15-19 Years

Current Value:
16.4
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4), Honolulu has a value of 16.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(17.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Honolulu has a value of 16.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.4).
Prior Value
(17.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
<div><span>FP-03:  Reduce pregnancies in adolescents<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Pregnancies that Are Intended

Current Value:
59.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.6%), Honolulu has a value of 59.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (60.4%), Honolulu has a value of 59.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(60.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (59.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.5%)
<div><span>FP-01: Reduce the proportion of unintended pregnancies<br /><br />The national indicator definition is limited to women aged 15-44 and uses live births as well as abortions and fetal losses for the denominator. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Teen Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teen Birth Rate

10.7
Births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.7), Honolulu has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Honolulu has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2).
Prior Value
(11.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Teen Girls at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

57.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.4%), Honolulu has a value of 57.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.8%), Honolulu has a value of 57.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (57.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.8%)
<div><span>FP-05: Increase the proportion of adolescent females at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of high school students, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>

County: Honolulu Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

49.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.7%), Honolulu has a value of 49.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (49.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.6%).
Prior Value
(55.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.1%)
<div><span>FP-10: Increase the proportion of women at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator only includes most effective or moderately effective methods of contraception and is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>