Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance

Current Value:
95.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (94.5%), Honolulu has a value of 95.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (95.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (97.2%).
Prior Value
(97.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (96.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(96.0%)

County: Honolulu Adult Oral Health ED Visits

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adult Oral Health ED Visits

311.3
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (379.8), Honolulu has a value of 311.3 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(379.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (311.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (33.2).
Prior Value
(33.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits

Current Value:
499.7
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (560.1), Honolulu has a value of 499.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(560.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (499.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (502.7).
Prior Value
(502.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP

Current Value:
69.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (69.2%), Honolulu has a value of 69.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(69.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (69.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.5%).
Prior Value
(75.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(90.7%)

County: Honolulu Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP

Current Value:
37.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.2%), Honolulu has a value of 37.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (37.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (54.7%).
Prior Value
(54.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (61%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(61%)

County: Honolulu Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline

Current Value:
71.6
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.3), Honolulu has a value of 71.6 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(71.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (71.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.9).
Prior Value
(72.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (81), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(81)

County: Honolulu Adults Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services

Current Value:
0
Adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet

35.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.2%), Honolulu has a value of 35.3%.
HI Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Honolulu has a value of 35.3%.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (35.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (35.8%).
Prior Value
(35.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Did Not See a Doctor Due to Cost

Current Value:
5.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Honolulu has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.1%), Honolulu has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.9%).
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups

Current Value:
77.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.6%), Honolulu has a value of 77.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(78.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (74.2%), Honolulu has a value of 77.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (77.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81.7%).
Prior Value
(81.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
78.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.8%), Honolulu has a value of 78.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (75.5%), Honolulu has a value of 78.2% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(75.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (78.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.5%).
Prior Value
(75.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help

Current Value:
15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Honolulu has a value of 15.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (43.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(43.8%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist

Current Value:
14.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.9%), Honolulu has a value of 14.0%.
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2%), Honolulu has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited a Dentist

73.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.9%), Honolulu has a value of 73.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(71.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (65.2%), Honolulu has a value of 73.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (73.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.6%).
Prior Value
(76.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist

Current Value:
19.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.6%), Honolulu has a value of 19.5%.
HI Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Honolulu has a value of 19.5%.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

16.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6%.
HI Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.4%).
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with a Diabetes Self-Management Plan

Current Value:
62.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.9%), Honolulu has a value of 62.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (62.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (64.0%).
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (69.8%), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(69.8%)

County: Honolulu Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
90.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (88.4%), Honolulu has a value of 90.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.8%), Honolulu has a value of 90.2% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (90.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.5%).
Prior Value
(90.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (83.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(83.9%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Health Insurance: 18+

Current Value:
90.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Honolulu has a value of 90.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.9%), Honolulu has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (90.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (93.9%).
Prior Value
(93.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with HMO Health Insurance

Current Value:
18.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.0%), Honolulu has a value of 18.9%.
HI Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.2%), Honolulu has a value of 18.9%.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.9%).
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance

Current Value:
8.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.7%), Honolulu has a value of 8.8%.
HI Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9%), Honolulu has a value of 8.8%.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Medicare Health Insurance

Current Value:
18.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.4%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3%.
HI Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Honolulu has a value of 18.3%.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (19.5%).
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Military Health Insurance

Current Value:
3.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.4%), Honolulu has a value of 3.7%.
HI Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Honolulu has a value of 3.7%.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (3.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with No Recent Dental Visit

Current Value:
26.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (28.1%), Honolulu has a value of 26.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(28.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.8%), Honolulu has a value of 26.1% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (26.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with Other Health Insurance

Current Value:
5.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8%.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.2%), Honolulu has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with POS Health Insurance

Current Value:
2.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Honolulu has a value of 2.1%.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.9%), Honolulu has a value of 2.1%.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults with PPO Health Insurance

Current Value:
37.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.1%), Honolulu has a value of 37.0%.
HI Value
(36.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.9%), Honolulu has a value of 37.0%.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (37.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (37.7%).
Prior Value
(37.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
2.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.9%), Honolulu has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.1%), Honolulu has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Alcohol Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
23.1
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.3), Honolulu has a value of 23.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(27.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu All-Cause Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
745.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (754.8), Honolulu has a value of 745.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(754.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (745.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (745.8).
Prior Value
(745.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Anxiety Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
40.0
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (172.7), Honolulu has a value of 40.0 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(172.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Children Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services

0
Children
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Children without Health Insurance

Current Value:
2.3%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), Honolulu has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.6%), Honolulu has a value of 7.4%.
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Honolulu has a value of 7.4%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu Delirium/Dementia Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

57.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.8), Honolulu has a value of 57.3 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(51.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Dentist Rate

97
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 97 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (88), Honolulu has a value of 97 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(88)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (97) is less and worse than the previously measured value (101).
Prior Value
(101)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

Current Value:
44.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Honolulu has a value of 44.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (44.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.2%).
Prior Value
(40.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

County: Honolulu Doctors of Osteopathy Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
4.4
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.1), Honolulu has a value of 4.4 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (4.4) is less and worse than the previously measured value (4.8).
Prior Value
(4.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Drug Use Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
101.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (105.2), Honolulu has a value of 101.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(105.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
63.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (64.9%), Honolulu has a value of 63.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(64.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (63.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.7%).
Prior Value
(67.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
5.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.5%), Honolulu has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Honolulu High Risk Adults Tested for Diabetes

Current Value:
87.6
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.9), Honolulu has a value of 87.6 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(86.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (87.6) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.9).
Prior Value
(52.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (67.5), the target has  been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(67.5)

County: Honolulu Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

Current Value:
8.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.0%), Honolulu has a value of 8.6%.
HI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Honolulu has a value of 8.6%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Honolulu Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services

11.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.6%), Honolulu has a value of 11.7%.
HI Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Honolulu has a value of 11.7%.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households that Received Maternity Care Services

Current Value:
5.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.3%), Honolulu has a value of 5.7%.
HI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Honolulu has a value of 5.7%.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room

26.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.4%), Honolulu has a value of 26.4%.
HI Value
(27.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Honolulu has a value of 26.4%.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (26.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (26.9%).
Prior Value
(26.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households that Received Medical Services in an Urgent Care Facility

27.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.1%), Honolulu has a value of 27.5%.
HI Value
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.9%), Honolulu has a value of 27.5%.
US Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (27.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (26.9%).
Prior Value
(26.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

Current Value:
9.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.5%), Honolulu has a value of 9.2%.
HI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Honolulu has a value of 9.2%.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services

Current Value:
10.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Honolulu has a value of 10.7%.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Honolulu has a value of 10.7%.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (10.2%).
Prior Value
(10.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

1.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2%), Honolulu has a value of 1.3%.
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Honolulu has a value of 1.3%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists

403
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (403) is greater and better than the previously measured value (402).
Prior Value
(402)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims

Current Value:
269
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (269) is less and worse than the previously measured value (279).
Prior Value
(279)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims

Current Value:
182
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (182) is greater and better than the previously measured value (169).
Prior Value
(169)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Medicare Healthcare Costs

$7,409
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($7,190), Honolulu has a value of $7,409.
HI Value
($7,190)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Honolulu has a value of $7,409.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu ($7,409) is greater  than the previously measured value ($7,401).
Prior Value
($7,401)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Mental Health Provider Rate

290
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 290 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 131 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (284), Honolulu has a value of 290 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(284)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (290) is greater and better than the previously measured value (287).
Prior Value
(287)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
81
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 81 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (77), Honolulu has a value of 81 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(77)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (81) is greater and better than the previously measured value (75).
Prior Value
(75)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Number of Practicing Physician Assistants

Current Value:
23.5
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.8), Honolulu has a value of 23.5 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(24.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (23.5) is greater and better than the previously measured value (22.8).
Prior Value
(22.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Nurse Practitioner Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Nurse Practitioner Rate

74.9
Per 100,000 population
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (65.1), Honolulu has a value of 74.9 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(65.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (74.9) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73.2).
Prior Value
(73.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Oral Health-Related ED Visits

Current Value:
14.1
Visits per 10,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.8), Honolulu has a value of 14.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
95.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 95.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (95.6%), Honolulu has a value of 95.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(95.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (95.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (95.7%).
Prior Value
(95.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(92.4%)
<div> <div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the US Census Bureau- Small Area Health Insurance Estimates.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
59.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.1%), Honolulu has a value of 59.3%.
HI Value
(57.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Honolulu has a value of 59.3%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (59.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (58.5%).
Prior Value
(58.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
18.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.4%), Honolulu has a value of 18.9%.
HI Value
(21.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Honolulu has a value of 18.9%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (18.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Persons without Health Insurance

Current Value:
3.6%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.1%), Honolulu has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), Honolulu has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist

Current Value:
45.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.6%), Honolulu has a value of 45.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (45.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.7%).
Prior Value
(45.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance

Current Value:
84.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.5%), Honolulu has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(81.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (84.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.4%).
Prior Value
(83.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (75.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(75.0%)
<div><span>AHS-02: Increase the proportion of people with dental insurance </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
1,580.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 1,580.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (1,581.0), Honolulu has a value of 1,580.0 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1,581.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Honolulu has a value of 1,580.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1,580.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,530.0).
Prior Value
(1,530.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Primary Care Provider Rate

99
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 99 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (93), Honolulu has a value of 99 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(93)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (99) is greater and better than the previously measured value (95).
Prior Value
(95)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims

66.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (66.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (72.7%).
Prior Value
(72.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims

45.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (45.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (44.0%).
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Schizophrenia Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
14.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.4), Honolulu has a value of 14.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Honolulu Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
74.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (73.2%), Honolulu has a value of 74.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(73.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (74.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy

Current Value:
45.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.6%), Honolulu has a value of 45.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.0%), Honolulu has a value of 45.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(40.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (45.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.0%).
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS

Current Value:
83.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.2%), Honolulu has a value of 83.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (83.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.6%).
Prior Value
(82.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy

Current Value:
85.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (84.9%), Honolulu has a value of 85.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (85.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.7%).
Prior Value
(84.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy

10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.4%), Honolulu has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy

Current Value:
48.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (47.4%), Honolulu has a value of 48.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(47.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (48.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.6%).
Prior Value
(48.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
72.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (70.2%), Honolulu has a value of 72.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (72.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.2%).
Prior Value
(66.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>