Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

County: Honolulu

Value
Compared to:

County: Honolulu Acute Hepatitis B Incidence Rate

Current Value:
0.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.0), Honolulu has a value of 0.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.1).
Prior Value
(0.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(0.1)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.1)
<div>IID-11: Reduce the rate of acute hepatitis B</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Honolulu Adults 18-26 with HPV Vaccines

Current Value:
36.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.9%), Honolulu has a value of 36.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(32.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (36.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.9%).
Prior Value
(38.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (34.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(34.8%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Formerly Smoked Cigarettes

Current Value:
24.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.7%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (24.9%), Honolulu has a value of 24.2% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(24.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (24.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (28.2%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(28.2%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Had Cancer

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Adults Who Have Had Cancer

6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Honolulu has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.5%), Honolulu has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (5.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(5.2%)

County: Honolulu Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.8%), Honolulu has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.6%), Honolulu has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (4.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Hepatitis B Vaccines

Current Value:
41.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Honolulu has a value of 41.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (41.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.8%).
Prior Value
(40.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (44.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(44.7%)

County: Honolulu Adults with Sunburns, past year

Current Value:
31.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.2%), Honolulu has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (31.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.4%).
Prior Value
(27.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (33.1%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(33.1%)

County: Honolulu All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu All Cancer Incidence Rate

422.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 422.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (413.9), Honolulu has a value of 422.3 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(413.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Honolulu has a value of 422.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (422.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (424.7).
Prior Value
(424.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
13.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 13.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,001 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Honolulu has a value of 13.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.9), Honolulu has a value of 13.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (13.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3).
Prior Value
(13.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

3.9
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.3), Honolulu has a value of 3.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4), Honolulu has a value of 3.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (3.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8).
Prior Value
(3.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Death Rate

16.1
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.1), Honolulu has a value of 16.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(18.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Honolulu has a value of 16.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2).
Prior Value
(16.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
<div> <div>C-04: Reduce the female breast cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

147.1
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 147.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (140.2), Honolulu has a value of 147.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(140.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Honolulu has a value of 147.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (147.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (146.7).
Prior Value
(146.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (122.8), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(122.8)

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Breast Cancer Screening

79.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.5%), Honolulu has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(78.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.3%), Honolulu has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (79.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.4%).
Prior Value
(83.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (92.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(92.1%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div> <div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cancer Death Rate

114.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (118.2), Honolulu has a value of 114.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(118.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (146.4), Honolulu has a value of 114.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (114.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (114.5).
Prior Value
(114.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (107.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(107.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-1:  </span></span><span>Reduce the overall cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors Who Have Obesity

Current Value:
20.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Honolulu has a value of 20.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (20.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (19.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(19.5%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors Who Smoke Cigarettes or E-cigarettes

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Honolulu has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3%).
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.6%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.6%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors with a Survivorship Care Plan

Current Value:
29.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.5%), Honolulu has a value of 29.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (29.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.5%).
Prior Value
(36.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (30.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(30.5%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors with a Written Treatment Summary

Current Value:
54.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (52.7%), Honolulu has a value of 54.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (54.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (51.1%).
Prior Value
(51.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (59.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(59.7%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors with an Advance Directive

Current Value:
67.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (65.8%), Honolulu has a value of 67.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(65.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (67.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (65.9%).
Prior Value
(65.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (70.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(70.5%)

County: Honolulu Cancer Survivors with Instructions for Follow Up Care

79.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.1%), Honolulu has a value of 79.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (79.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.4%).
Prior Value
(80.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (82.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(82.8%)

County: Honolulu Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cancer: Medicare Population

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (11.0%), Honolulu has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Honolulu has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Death Rate

1.7
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0), Honolulu has a value of 1.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.0 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.3), Honolulu has a value of 1.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.3 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (1.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.6).
Prior Value
(1.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.4)

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
7.0
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.9), Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.7).
Prior Value
(6.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (6.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(6.1)

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Cervical Cancer Screening

80.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.2%), Honolulu has a value of 80.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (80.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (88.3%).
Prior Value
(88.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(84.3%)
<div> <div>C-09: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer.<br /> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
17.2
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 721 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.5), Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Honolulu has a value of 17.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (17.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5).
Prior Value
(17.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
73.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 73.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Honolulu has a value of 73.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

11.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.1), Honolulu has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Honolulu has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.7).
Prior Value
(11.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.9)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div> <div>C-06: Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
39.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 39.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (38.8), Honolulu has a value of 39.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Honolulu has a value of 39.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (39.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.1).
Prior Value
(40.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (35.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(35.3)

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Colorectal Cancer Screening

77.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (77.1%), Honolulu has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(77.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (74.2%), Honolulu has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (77.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.5%).
Prior Value
(77.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.8%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (74.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div> <div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
63.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (64.9%), Honolulu has a value of 63.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(64.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (63.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.7%).
Prior Value
(67.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

Current Value:
8.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.0%), Honolulu has a value of 8.6%.
HI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Honolulu has a value of 8.6%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (8.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Honolulu Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.8), Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Honolulu has a value of 10.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (10.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0).
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Honolulu Liver or Bile Duct Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
7.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.2), Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.2 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7), Honolulu has a value of 7.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (7.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.8).
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Honolulu Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
43.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 43.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (41.7), Honolulu has a value of 43.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(41.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Honolulu has a value of 43.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (43.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.7).
Prior Value
(44.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (38.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(38.3)

County: Honolulu Lung Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Lung Cancer Death Rate

21.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.9), Honolulu has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(21.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.7), Honolulu has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (21.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.2).
Prior Value
(23.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.3)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-02:  </span></span><span>Reduce the lung cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Lung Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Lung Cancer Screening

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Honolulu has a value of 15.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (9.7%), Honolulu has a value of 15.4% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(9.7% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (12.3%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(12.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (7.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(7.5%)
<div><span>C-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for lung cancer </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in differently as adults 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit in the last 15 years. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Honolulu Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
46.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (44.0%), Honolulu has a value of 46.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Honolulu has a value of 46.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (46.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (44.0%).
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Melanoma Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Melanoma Cancer Death Rate

0.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2), Honolulu has a value of 0.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.0), Honolulu has a value of 0.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (0.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.9).
Prior Value
(0.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.1), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.1)

County: Honolulu Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Melanoma Incidence Rate

19.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 19.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (24.4), Honolulu has a value of 19.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(24.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5), Honolulu has a value of 19.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (19.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.2).
Prior Value
(19.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.2), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.2)

County: Honolulu Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

25.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Honolulu has a value of 25.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (31.8%), Honolulu has a value of 25.5% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(31.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (25.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.5%).
Prior Value
(25.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (27.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(27.9%)

County: Honolulu Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor

Current Value:
15.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.7%), Honolulu has a value of 15.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6%).
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (16.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(16.2%)

County: Honolulu Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
15.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 15.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,912 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (14.9), Honolulu has a value of 15.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6), Honolulu has a value of 15.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (15.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.5).
Prior Value
(15.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
12.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 12.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.0), Honolulu has a value of 12.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Honolulu has a value of 12.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.4).
Prior Value
(12.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Oropharyngeal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.7), Honolulu has a value of 2.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.7 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7), Honolulu has a value of 2.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0).
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (2.6), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(2.6)

County: Honolulu Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.4
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 9.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 908 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.2), Honolulu has a value of 9.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.1), Honolulu has a value of 9.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (9.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5).
Prior Value
(9.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 14.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,733 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Honolulu has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2), Honolulu has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9).
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Prostate Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Prostate Cancer Death Rate

14.8
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9), Honolulu has a value of 14.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Honolulu has a value of 14.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7).
Prior Value
(13.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (15.0), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(15.0)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-08:  </span></span><span>Reduce the prostate cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Honolulu Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
109.6
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Honolulu has a value of 109.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (101.1), Honolulu has a value of 109.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(101.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Honolulu has a value of 109.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (109.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (110.1).
Prior Value
(110.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.1)

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:

County: Honolulu Teens Who Use Sunscreen

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.1%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.5%), Honolulu has a value of 16.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (16.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3%).
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)

County: Honolulu Uterine Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
36.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4), Honolulu has a value of 36.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.4), Honolulu has a value of 36.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (36.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.7).
Prior Value
(35.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Honolulu Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test

Current Value:
76.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.1%), Honolulu has a value of 76.1%.
HI Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (77.7%), Honolulu has a value of 76.1% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (76.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (84.3%).
Prior Value
(84.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (83.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(83.7%)

County: Honolulu Women 30-65 Who Had an HPV Test

Current Value:
46.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.8%), Honolulu has a value of 46.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (46.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.1%).
Prior Value
(49.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (49.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(49.3%)

County: Honolulu Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:
14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Honolulu has a value of 14.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (14.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.9%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)