Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Adolescent Health

Health / Adolescent Health

Health / Adolescent Health

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Adolescent Health

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Intimate Partner Violence Among Teens

Current Value:
6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.9%), Hawaii has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Teens

Current Value:
3.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.1%), Hawaii has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii LGB Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:

County: Hawaii LGB Teens Who Are Bullied

22.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.3%), Hawaii has a value of 22.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.0%), Hawaii has a value of 22.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.0% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.5%).
Prior Value
(39.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-05: Reduce bullying of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii LGB Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
34.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (39.1%), Hawaii has a value of 34.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(39.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.1%), Hawaii has a value of 34.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(48.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-06: Reduce suicidal thoughts in lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition includes making a plan or attempting suicide in the past 12 months. The data source is the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii LGB Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
45.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (52.4%), Hawaii has a value of 45.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Are Bullied

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.5%), Hawaii has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

Current Value:
14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Hawaii has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Ever Used illicit drugs

Current Value:
37.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.8%), Hawaii has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1%), Hawaii has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (51.0%).
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need

Current Value:
22.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.1%), Hawaii has a value of 22.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
26.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (23.5%), Hawaii has a value of 26.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Hawaii has a value of 26.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of high school students in grades who get enough sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Skipped School for Safety

Current Value:
17.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.6%), Hawaii has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), Hawaii has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

63.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.2%), Hawaii has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.9%), Hawaii has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (63.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (61.3%).
Prior Value
(61.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)

County: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
80.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.9%), Hawaii has a value of 80.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (80.2%), Hawaii has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.8%).
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (73.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)

County: Hawaii Teens with Recent Depression

Current Value:
36.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.8%), Hawaii has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.3%), Hawaii has a value of 36.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.6%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.2%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:
35.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.5%), Hawaii has a value of 35.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (35.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.6%).
Prior Value
(44.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

Current Value:
28.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.7%), Hawaii has a value of 28.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.7%).
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need

Current Value:
23.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (22.8%), Hawaii has a value of 23.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(22.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.3%).
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
45.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.1%), Hawaii has a value of 45.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(46.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.2%).
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of students in grades 9 through 12 who get sufficient sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. There is no national middle school survey for students in grades 6-8; however, Hawaiʻi has additional data for this indicator. </span></div> </div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Skipped School for Safety

Current Value:
8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.9%), Hawaii has a value of 8.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

54.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.3%), Hawaii has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (54.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
74.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.2%), Hawaii has a value of 74.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (86.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens with Ever Depression

Current Value:
33.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
25.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (26.9%), Hawaii has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Binge Drink

18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.2%), Hawaii has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (16.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.4%).
Prior Value
(19.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (25.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(25.4%)
<div>SU-10: Reduce the proportion of people aged 21 years and over who engaged in binge drinking in the past month <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator includes persons aged 21 and over.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source but includes adults 18 years and older.</div>

County: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Alcohol

51.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.1%), Hawaii has a value of 51.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (53.4%), Hawaii has a value of 51.7% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(53.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (51.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.5%).
Prior Value
(50.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Drink and Drive

Current Value:
2.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.9%), Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (2.3%), Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Excessively

Current Value:
20.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Hawaii has a value of 20.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Heavily

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Drink Heavily

10.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.1%), Hawaii has a value of 10.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.8%), Hawaii has a value of 10.7% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Use Marijuana

20.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 20.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.4%).
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Alcohol Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
38.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.3), Hawaii has a value of 38.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Cirrhosis Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Cirrhosis Death Rate

13.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.4), Hawaii has a value of 13.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.4 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.5), Hawaii has a value of 13.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0).
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.9)
<div> <div>SU-02: Reduce cirrhosis deaths</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:
11.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 11.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.1), Hawaii has a value of 11.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Hawaii has a value of 11.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.3).
Prior Value
(12.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (13.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(13.1)
<div>IVP-20: Reduce overdose deaths involving opioids</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Hawaii Drug Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Drug Overdose Death Rate

14.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.7), Hawaii has a value of 14.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.7 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Hawaii has a value of 14.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.7).
Prior Value
(11.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(20.7)
<div> <div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div><strong></strong></div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Drug Use Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
133.2
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (105.2), Hawaii has a value of 133.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(105.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

1.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2%), Hawaii has a value of 1.1%.
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Hawaii has a value of 1.1%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.1%).
Prior Value
(1.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Illegal Drugs on School Property HS

Current Value:
26.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Hawaii has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Hawaii has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.7%)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.6%).
Prior Value
(31.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Illegal Drugs on School Property MS

Current Value:
10.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Hawaii has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs

Current Value:
46.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.6%), Hawaii has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Hawaii has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.3%).
Prior Value
(58.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-07: Reduce the proportion of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students who have used illicit drugs<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Proportion of Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths Involving a Drunk Driver

46.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.2%), Hawaii has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (33.3%).
Prior Value
(33.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (28.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(28.3%)
<div> <div>SU-11: Reduce the proportion of motor vehicle crash deaths that involve a drunk driver</div> <div> </div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;">The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Hawaii Teen Boys Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teen Boys Who Binge Drink

17.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.3%), Hawaii has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Hawaii has a value of 17.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for boys, while 'Teen Girls Who Binge Drink' presents the data for girls.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teen Girls Who Binge Drink

Current Value:
15.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.8%), Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.8% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for girls, while 'Teen Boys Who Binge Drink' presents the data for boys.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Binge Drink

11.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.3%), Hawaii has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Hawaii has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.1%).
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. Binge drinking is defined the same in the YRBS and NSDUH for high school students in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Alcohol

21.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.6%), Hawaii has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Hawaii has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.9%).
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Marijuana

18.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.0%), Hawaii has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Hawaii has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:
4.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator includes adolescents ages 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. However, binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks on one occasional for girls and 5 or more drinks for boys in the NSDUH, but only as 5 or more drinks for boys or girls in this indicator for middle school students grades 6-8. </div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
1.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.7%), Hawaii has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:
9.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Have Had Cancer

Current Value:
7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.1%), Hawaii has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.5%), Hawaii has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (5.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(5.2%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who've Had Skin Cancer

Current Value:
7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (6.6%), Hawaii has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (4.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(4.1%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Hepatitis B Vaccines

Current Value:
30.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Hawaii has a value of 30.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.8%).
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (44.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(44.7%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Sunburns, past year

Current Value:
34.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.2%), Hawaii has a value of 34.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (33.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(33.1%)

County: Hawaii All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii All Cancer Incidence Rate

395.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 395.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (413.9), Hawaii has a value of 395.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(413.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Hawaii has a value of 395.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (395.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (400.5).
Prior Value
(400.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 14.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,001 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Hawaii has a value of 14.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.9), Hawaii has a value of 14.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.5).
Prior Value
(14.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
5.2
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.3), Hawaii has a value of 5.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4), Hawaii has a value of 5.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0).
Prior Value
(5.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Death Rate

18.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.1), Hawaii has a value of 18.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Hawaii has a value of 18.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4).
Prior Value
(16.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
<div> <div>C-04: Reduce the female breast cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
122.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 122.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (140.2), Hawaii has a value of 122.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(140.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Hawaii has a value of 122.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (122.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (125.8).
Prior Value
(125.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (122.8), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(122.8)

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

75.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.5%), Hawaii has a value of 75.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(78.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.3%), Hawaii has a value of 75.3% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.2%).
Prior Value
(82.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (92.1%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(92.1%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div> <div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

134.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (118.2), Hawaii has a value of 134.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(118.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (146.4), Hawaii has a value of 134.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (134.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (141.2).
Prior Value
(141.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (107.5), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(107.5)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-1:  </span></span><span>Reduce the overall cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors Who Have Obesity

Current Value:
26.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.3%), Hawaii has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.6%).
Prior Value
(24.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (19.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(19.5%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors Who Smoke Cigarettes or E-cigarettes

15.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Hawaii has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.6%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.6%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with a Survivorship Care Plan

Current Value:
20.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.5%), Hawaii has a value of 20.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(27.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.1%).
Prior Value
(27.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (30.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(30.5%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with a Written Treatment Summary

46.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (52.7%), Hawaii has a value of 46.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.6%).
Prior Value
(45.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (59.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(59.7%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with an Advance Directive

Current Value:
60.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (65.8%), Hawaii has a value of 60.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(65.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (60.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.6%).
Prior Value
(59.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (70.5%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(70.5%)

County: Hawaii Cancer Survivors with Instructions for Follow Up Care

79.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.1%), Hawaii has a value of 79.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (79.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.5%).
Prior Value
(60.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (82.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(82.8%)

County: Hawaii Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (11.0%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Hawaii has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.2
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0), Hawaii has a value of 2.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.0 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.3), Hawaii has a value of 2.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.3 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.6).
Prior Value
(2.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.4)

County: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.9), Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Hawaii has a value of 6.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4).
Prior Value
(7.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (6.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(6.1)

County: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Screening

82.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.2%), Hawaii has a value of 82.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (82.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.5%).
Prior Value
(83.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(84.3%)
<div> <div>C-09: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer.<br /> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
15.2
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 15.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 721 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (16.5), Hawaii has a value of 15.2 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Hawaii has a value of 15.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1).
Prior Value
(14.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
73.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 73.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Hawaii has a value of 73.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
11.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.1), Hawaii has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.1 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Hawaii has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.7).
Prior Value
(10.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(8.9)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div> <div>C-06: Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

County: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
33.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 33.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (38.8), Hawaii has a value of 33.0 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(38.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Hawaii has a value of 33.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.5).
Prior Value
(34.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (35.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(35.3)

County: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Screening

Current Value:
74.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (77.1%), Hawaii has a value of 74.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(77.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (74.2%), Hawaii has a value of 74.7% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.0%).
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.8%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.8%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (74.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div> <div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
61.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (64.9%), Hawaii has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(64.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (61.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.1%).
Prior Value
(68.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

Current Value:
10.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.0%), Hawaii has a value of 10.5%.
HI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Hawaii has a value of 10.5%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Hawaii Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
8.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 8.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.8), Hawaii has a value of 8.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Hawaii has a value of 8.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0).
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Hawaii Liver or Bile Duct Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
8.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.2), Hawaii has a value of 8.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.2 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7), Hawaii has a value of 8.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1).
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.3), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.3)

County: Hawaii Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
40.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 40.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (41.7), Hawaii has a value of 40.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(41.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Hawaii has a value of 40.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (40.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.4).
Prior Value
(43.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (38.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(38.3)

County: Hawaii Lung Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Lung Cancer Death Rate

24.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.9), Hawaii has a value of 24.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.7), Hawaii has a value of 24.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.1).
Prior Value
(25.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.3), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.3)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-02:  </span></span><span>Reduce the lung cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Hawaii has a value of 9.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (9.7%), Hawaii has a value of 9.5% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(9.7% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (12.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(12.3%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (7.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(7.5%)
<div><span>C-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for lung cancer </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in differently as adults 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit in the last 15 years. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 38.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (44.0%), Hawaii has a value of 38.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Hawaii has a value of 38.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (39.0%).
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Melanoma Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2), Hawaii has a value of 2.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.0), Hawaii has a value of 2.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2).
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (1.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(1.1)

County: Hawaii Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Melanoma Incidence Rate

32.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 32.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (24.4), Hawaii has a value of 32.9 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(24.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5), Hawaii has a value of 32.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.6).
Prior Value
(32.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (20.2), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(20.2)

County: Hawaii Men 40+ Who Had a PSA Test

Current Value:
24.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Hawaii has a value of 24.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (31.8%), Hawaii has a value of 24.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(31.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (27.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(27.9%)

County: Hawaii Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor

Current Value:
13.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.7%), Hawaii has a value of 13.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (16.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(16.2%)

County: Hawaii Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
17.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 17.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,912 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (14.9), Hawaii has a value of 17.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6), Hawaii has a value of 17.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.8).
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
12.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 12.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.0), Hawaii has a value of 12.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Hawaii has a value of 12.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.5).
Prior Value
(12.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Oropharyngeal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
2.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.7), Hawaii has a value of 2.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.7 in 2020-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7), Hawaii has a value of 2.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.1).
Prior Value
(2.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (2.6), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(2.6)

County: Hawaii Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
7.9
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 7.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 908 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (9.2), Hawaii has a value of 7.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.1), Hawaii has a value of 7.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.5).
Prior Value
(8.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
13.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 13.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,733 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.5), Hawaii has a value of 13.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2), Hawaii has a value of 13.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.9).
Prior Value
(14.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Prostate Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
19.2
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9), Hawaii has a value of 19.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(15.9 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Hawaii has a value of 19.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.2).
Prior Value
(17.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (15.0), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(15.0)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-08:  </span></span><span>Reduce the prostate cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
84.8
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 84.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (101.1), Hawaii has a value of 84.8 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(101.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Hawaii has a value of 84.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (84.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.6).
Prior Value
(79.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (84.1), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.1)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Sunscreen

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.1%), Hawaii has a value of 15.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.5%), Hawaii has a value of 15.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)

County: Hawaii Uterine Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
30.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4), Hawaii has a value of 30.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.4), Hawaii has a value of 30.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.6).
Prior Value
(30.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test

Current Value:
77.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.1%), Hawaii has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (77.7%), Hawaii has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.8%).
Prior Value
(77.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (83.7%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(83.7%)

County: Hawaii Women 30-65 Who Had an HPV Test

Current Value:
46.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.8%), Hawaii has a value of 46.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.9%).
Prior Value
(41.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (49.3%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(49.3%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Hawaii has a value of 13.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes

Current Value:
12.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.2%), Hawaii has a value of 12.8%.
HI Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7%), Hawaii has a value of 12.8%.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with a Diabetes Self-Management Plan

Current Value:
62.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.9%), Hawaii has a value of 62.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (62.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.7%).
Prior Value
(62.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (69.8%), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(69.8%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults with Diabetes

11.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.7%), Hawaii has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.6%), Hawaii has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.4%).
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with New Cases of Diabetes

Current Value:
8.6
New cases per 1,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.7), Hawaii has a value of 8.6 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3), Hawaii has a value of 8.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3).
Prior Value
(9.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (4.8), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(4.8)
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (4.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(4.8)
<div><span>D-01:  Reduce the number of diabetes cases diagnosed yearly <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes adults aged 18-84.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the US Diabetes Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Adults with Prediabetes

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults with Prediabetes

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.0%), Hawaii has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Diabetes Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Diabetes Death Rate

16.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.0), Hawaii has a value of 16.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(17.0 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.4), Hawaii has a value of 16.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0).
Prior Value
(17.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Diabetes Death Rate (Multiple Cause of Death)

Current Value:
57.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.2), Hawaii has a value of 57.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(62.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (93.6), Hawaii has a value of 57.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(93.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (57.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (54.8).
Prior Value
(54.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (56.0), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(56.0)

County: Hawaii Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (27.0%), Hawaii has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Hawaii has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii High Risk Adults Tested for Diabetes

Current Value:
85.9
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.9), Hawaii has a value of 85.9 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(86.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (85.9) is greater and better than the previously measured value (58.2).
Prior Value
(58.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (67.5), the target has  been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(67.5)

County: Hawaii Hospitalization for Diabetes among Adults 65+

Current Value:
241.1
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (282.1), Hawaii has a value of 241.1 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(282.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (241.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (198.0).
Prior Value
(198.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (264), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(264)
<div><span>OA-05: Reduce the rate of hospital admissions for diabetes among older adults<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indictor is the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The state data source is Laulima, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults with a Cognitive Disability

Current Value:
12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Hawaii has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.4%), Hawaii has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.2%).
Prior Value
(10.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Adults with a Disability

28.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.1%), Hawaii has a value of 28.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(24.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (27.6%), Hawaii has a value of 28.6% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(27.6% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.7%).
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with a Self-Care Disability

Current Value:
2.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.5%), Hawaii has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with a Vision Disability

Current Value:
5.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.0%), Hawaii has a value of 5.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (5.3%), Hawaii has a value of 5.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Activity Limitations due to Arthritis

44.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.5%), Hawaii has a value of 44.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(35.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.4%), Hawaii has a value of 44.5% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.1%).
Prior Value
(34.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (38.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(38.7%)
<div><span>A-02:  Reduce the proportion of adults with arthritis whose arthritis limits their activities<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Adults with an Ambulatory Disability

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.7%), Hawaii has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.3%), Hawaii has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with an Independent Living Disability

Current Value:
6.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Hawaii has a value of 6.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
22.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 22.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Hawaii has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 22.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Work Limitations due to Arthritis

Current Value:
32.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.9%), Hawaii has a value of 32.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.9%), Hawaii has a value of 32.9% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.9%).
Prior Value
(34.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (34.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(34.7%)
<div><span>A-03:  Reduce the proportion of adults with arthritis whose arthritis limits their work<br /> <br />The national indicator is limited to adults aged 18-64.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Children with a Disability

Current Value:
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.4%), Hawaii has a value of 5.1%.
HI Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Hawaii has a value of 5.1%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.9%), Hawaii has a value of 6.7%.
HI Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Hawaii has a value of 6.7%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Persons with a Disability

15.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.0%), Hawaii has a value of 15.3%.
HI Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Hawaii has a value of 15.3%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 5.3%.
HI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Hawaii has a value of 5.3%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.5%), Hawaii has a value of 2.8%.
HI Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Hawaii has a value of 2.8%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0%), Hawaii has a value of 3.1%.
HI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Hawaii has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Hawaii has a value of 7.2%.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 7.2%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Family Planning

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys

Current Value:
75.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.4%), Hawaii has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.7%), Hawaii has a value of 75.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls

Current Value:
75.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.0%), Hawaii has a value of 75.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (69.4%), Hawaii has a value of 75.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (63.7%).
Prior Value
(63.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys

Current Value:
93.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (96.4%), Hawaii has a value of 93.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.9%).
Prior Value
(90.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls

Current Value:
94.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (95.1%), Hawaii has a value of 94.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.7%).
Prior Value
(93.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Births to Mothers Under 18 Years

Current Value:
0.9%
% of births to mothers <18
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.6%), Hawaii has a value of 0.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Condom Use Among Teen Boys

Current Value:
55.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.8%), Hawaii has a value of 55.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.7%), Hawaii has a value of 55.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.7% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (81.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(81.3%)
<div> <p>FP-06: Increase the proportion of adolescent males who used a condom the last time they had sex</p> <p>The national indicator is defined differently as it is for adolescents aged 15-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawai‘i cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.</p> </div>

County: Hawaii Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Yrs Education

Current Value:
11.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.8%), Hawaii has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.1%), Hawaii has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Pregnancies Among Females Aged 15-19 Years

Current Value:
18.6
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4), Hawaii has a value of 18.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Hawaii has a value of 18.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.9).
Prior Value
(18.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
<div><span>FP-03:  Reduce pregnancies in adolescents<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Pregnancies that Are Intended

Current Value:
53.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.6%), Hawaii has a value of 53.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (60.4%), Hawaii has a value of 53.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(60.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (53.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.2%).
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.5%)
<div><span>FP-01: Reduce the proportion of unintended pregnancies<br /><br />The national indicator definition is limited to women aged 15-44 and uses live births as well as abortions and fetal losses for the denominator. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teen Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teen Birth Rate

15.7
Births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.7), Hawaii has a value of 15.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Hawaii has a value of 15.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2).
Prior Value
(16.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teen Girls at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

73.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.4%), Hawaii has a value of 73.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(62.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.8%), Hawaii has a value of 73.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (73.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.2%).
Prior Value
(66.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.8%)
<div><span>FP-05: Increase the proportion of adolescent females at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of high school students, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

51.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (50.7%), Hawaii has a value of 51.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (51.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.8%).
Prior Value
(55.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.1%)
<div><span>FP-10: Increase the proportion of women at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator only includes most effective or moderately effective methods of contraception and is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Who Did Not See a Doctor Due to Cost

Current Value:
6.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Hawaii has a value of 6.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.1%), Hawaii has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups

80.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.6%), Hawaii has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(78.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (74.2%), Hawaii has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (79.2%).
Prior Value
(79.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
75.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.8%), Hawaii has a value of 75.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (75.5%), Hawaii has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(75.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (73.1%).
Prior Value
(73.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
86.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (88.4%), Hawaii has a value of 86.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.8%), Hawaii has a value of 86.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (86.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.7%).
Prior Value
(88.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (83.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(83.9%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Health Insurance: 18+

Current Value:
89.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 89.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Hawaii has a value of 89.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.9%), Hawaii has a value of 89.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (89.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (93.8%).
Prior Value
(93.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with HMO Health Insurance

Current Value:
11.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.0%), Hawaii has a value of 11.6%.
HI Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.2%), Hawaii has a value of 11.6%.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance

Current Value:
9.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.7%), Hawaii has a value of 9.9%.
HI Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9%), Hawaii has a value of 9.9%.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.2%).
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Medicare Health Insurance

Current Value:
28.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.4%), Hawaii has a value of 28.6%.
HI Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Hawaii has a value of 28.6%.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (29.5%).
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Military Health Insurance

Current Value:
6.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.4%), Hawaii has a value of 6.1%.
HI Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Hawaii has a value of 6.1%.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Other Health Insurance

Current Value:
5.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Hawaii has a value of 5.6%.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.2%), Hawaii has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with POS Health Insurance

Current Value:
1.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Hawaii has a value of 1.9%.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.9%), Hawaii has a value of 1.9%.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.9%).
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with PPO Health Insurance

Current Value:
31.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.1%), Hawaii has a value of 31.1%.
HI Value
(36.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.9%), Hawaii has a value of 31.1%.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (31.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (31.5%).
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.