Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
13.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 13.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (13.8%), Hawaii has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet

33.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.2%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8%.
HI Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8%.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults with Internet Access

Current Value:
91.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 91.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (95.0%), Hawaii has a value of 91.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.7%), Hawaii has a value of 91.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (91.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (93.8%).
Prior Value
(93.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
26.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 26.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (21.8%), Hawaii has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 19.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 19.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hawaii has a value of 19.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio

7.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 7.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.3%), Hawaii has a value of 7.3%.
HI Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Households with a Computer

Current Value:
86.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90.5%), Hawaii has a value of 86.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.2%), Hawaii has a value of 86.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (86.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (85.8%).
Prior Value
(85.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households with a Smartphone

Current Value:
81.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 81.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (86.2%), Hawaii has a value of 81.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.7%), Hawaii has a value of 81.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (78.4%).
Prior Value
(78.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
87.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90.0%), Hawaii has a value of 87.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Hawaii has a value of 87.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

92.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (94.5%), Hawaii has a value of 92.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Hawaii has a value of 92.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Internet Usage

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Internet Usage

87.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Hawaii has a value of 87.9%.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (85.0%), Hawaii has a value of 87.9%.
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (87.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (81.3%).
Prior Value
(81.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Intimate Partner Violence Among Teens

Current Value:
6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.9%), Hawaii has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Teens

Current Value:
3.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.1%), Hawaii has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Linguistic Isolation

3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 3.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.5%), Hawaii has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Hawaii has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
9,873
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
89.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 89.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (92.6%), Hawaii has a value of 89.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(92.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Hawaii has a value of 89.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Social Associations

6.6
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 6.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (6.7), Hawaii has a value of 6.6 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(6.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Hawaii has a value of 6.6 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.6) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6.7).
Prior Value
(6.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

Current Value:
14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Hawaii has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need

Current Value:
22.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.1%), Hawaii has a value of 22.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

63.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.2%), Hawaii has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.9%), Hawaii has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (63.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (61.3%).
Prior Value
(61.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)

County: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
80.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.9%), Hawaii has a value of 80.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (80.2%), Hawaii has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.8%).
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (73.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)

County: Hawaii Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
77.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (73.5%), Hawaii has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.7%).
Prior Value
(78.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:
35.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.5%), Hawaii has a value of 35.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (35.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.6%).
Prior Value
(44.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

Current Value:
28.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.7%), Hawaii has a value of 28.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.7%).
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need

Current Value:
23.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (22.8%), Hawaii has a value of 23.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(22.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.3%).
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

54.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.3%), Hawaii has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (54.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
74.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.2%), Hawaii has a value of 74.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (86.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
74.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (74.6%), Hawaii has a value of 74.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(74.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (82.2%).
Prior Value
(82.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (2.7%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.