Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke

Current Value:
8.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.4%), Hawaii has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (17.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(17.3%)
<div>TU-19: Reduce the proportion of people who donʻt smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke</div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span></span></span></div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span>The national indicator is defined differently as the proportion of children, nonsmoking adolescents, and nonsmoking adults aged 3 years and over who had a serum cotinine level greater than or equal to 0.05 ng/mL and less than or equal to 10 ng/ml. </span>The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported data and only includes adults ages 18+.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Annual Particle Pollution

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Annual Particle Pollution

1
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Hawaii has a value of 1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1) is less and better than the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Days with Unsatisfactory Air Quality

Current Value:
11
Days
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11), Hawaii has a value of 11.
HI Value
(11)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (275), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(275)
<div><span>EH-01: Reduce the number of days people are exposed to unhealthy air <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator is defined differently as it is weighted by score and population and is reported in people-days.  Although the national target is 3,866,365,816 people-days, we chose a target based on the 2020 baseline value for the state, 306 days.  Using the common target-setting method of a 10% improvement, we set the target for Hawaii state at 275 days.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Current Value:
722
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (722) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (667).
Prior Value
(667)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
74.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 74.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (93.7%), Hawaii has a value of 74.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(93.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.0%), Hawaii has a value of 74.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Hawaii Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Access to Parks

30.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.6%), Hawaii has a value of 30.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (30.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

25.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.8%), Hawaii has a value of 25.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Hawaii has a value of 25.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (29.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(29.7%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

57.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (56.0%), Hawaii has a value of 57.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 57.4% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (57.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (62.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(62.2%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

42.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.3%), Hawaii has a value of 42.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 42.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.7%).
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (40.3%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(40.3%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

Current Value:
37.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.9%), Hawaii has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Hawaii has a value of 37.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.9%).
Prior Value
(30.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (42.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(42.1%)

County: Hawaii Community Spending on Transportation

Current Value:
17.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4%), Hawaii has a value of 17.8%.
HI Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Hawaii has a value of 17.8%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Food Environment Index

7.1
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 7.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,109 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.9), Hawaii has a value of 7.1 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(7.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Hawaii has a value of 7.1 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.1) is less and worse than the previously measured value (7.5).
Prior Value
(7.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Liquor Store Density

1.5
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 1.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (4.2), Hawaii has a value of 1.5 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Hawaii has a value of 1.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.0).
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Overcrowded Households

7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Hawaii has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Proximity to Highways

3.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.6%), Hawaii has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Severe Housing Problems

23.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 23.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (26.2%), Hawaii has a value of 23.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), Hawaii has a value of 23.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5%).
Prior Value
(22.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Energy & Sustainability

Environmental Health / Energy & Sustainability

Environmental Health / Energy & Sustainability

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Energy & Sustainability

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

3.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (2.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
5.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Hawaii has a value of 5.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Hawaii has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 10.4%.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate

1.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.3), Hawaii has a value of 1.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1), Hawaii has a value of 1.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2).
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.89), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.89)
<div>RD-01: Reduce asthma deaths </div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate 35-64 Yrs

Current Value:
9.3
Deaths per 1,000,000 population 35-64
(2006-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.2), Hawaii has a value of 9.3 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.2 in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8), Hawaii has a value of 9.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.8 in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.8).
Prior Value
(10.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (7.0%), Hawaii has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Hawaii has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan (4.9%), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan
(4.9%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>

County: Hawaii Children with Current Asthma

Current Value:
10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.2%), Hawaii has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan (10.4%), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan
(10.4%)
<div>Value reflects a 5% change from the baseline value in 2011.</div>

County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Adults 65+

Current Value:
37.5
Visits per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.5), Hawaii has a value of 37.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.5)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.3).
Prior Value
(21.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (26.1), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(26.1)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (40.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div> <div>RD-03: Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined for people ages 5 years and older. Hawaiʻi tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Children 0-4

Current Value:
91.5
Visits per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (54.2), Hawaii has a value of 91.5 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(54.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (91.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (48.1).
Prior Value
(48.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (65.7), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(65.7)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (64.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(64.3)
<div> <div><span>RD-02:  </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for children under 5 years with asthma</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data.  The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma: 5-64 yrs

Current Value:
51.9
Visits per 10,000 people 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.6), Hawaii has a value of 51.9 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (51.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.5).
Prior Value
(39.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (41.4), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(41.4)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (40.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div> <div><span>RD-03:  </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined for people aged 5 years and older.  Hawaii tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data.  The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma 5-64 yrs

Current Value:
4.1
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0), Hawaii has a value of 4.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.7).
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (2.4), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(2.4)

County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma among Adults 65+

Current Value:
2.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.7), Hawaii has a value of 2.8 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.4).
Prior Value
(2.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (4.8), the target has  been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(4.8)

County: Hawaii Hospitalizations for Asthma Among Children 0-4

Current Value:
17.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.2), Hawaii has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.7).
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Asthma Plan Target (6.7), the target has not been met.
Asthma Plan Target
(6.7)

County: Hawaii PBT Released

Current Value:

County: Hawaii PBT Released

5,166
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5,166) is less and better than the previously measured value (18,994).
Prior Value
(18,994)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Safe Beaches for Swimming

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Safe Beaches for Swimming

93.0%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (94.9%).
Prior Value
(94.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Smoke-Free Homes

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Smoke-Free Homes

92.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (93.2%), Hawaii has a value of 92.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(93.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (92.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.8%).
Prior Value
(89.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:
5,191.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4,793.0), Hawaii has a value of 5,191.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4,793.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5,191.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5,179.0).
Prior Value
(5,179.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
6
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6) is less and better than the previously measured value (8).
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.