Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Adolescent Health

Health / Adolescent Health

Health / Adolescent Health

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Adolescent Health

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys

Current Value:
75.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.4%), Hawaii has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.7%), Hawaii has a value of 75.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls

Current Value:
75.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (80.0%), Hawaii has a value of 75.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (69.4%), Hawaii has a value of 75.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (63.7%).
Prior Value
(63.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys

Current Value:
93.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (96.4%), Hawaii has a value of 93.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (93.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.9%).
Prior Value
(90.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls

Current Value:
94.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (95.1%), Hawaii has a value of 94.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.7%).
Prior Value
(93.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Births to Mothers Under 18 Years

Current Value:
0.9%
% of births to mothers <18
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.6%), Hawaii has a value of 0.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Children Who Drank Soda with Sugar Yesterday

Current Value:
16.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.4%), Hawaii has a value of 16.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.2%).
Prior Value
(17.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (11.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(11.3%)

County: Hawaii Children Who Drank Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Yesterday

38.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.9%), Hawaii has a value of 38.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (38.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (25.2%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(25.2%)

County: Hawaii Children Who Drank Sweetened Drinks Yesterday

Current Value:
32.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.9%), Hawaii has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (18.7%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(18.7%)

County: Hawaii Children Who Eat Fast Food at Least Once Per Week

42.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (55.6%), Hawaii has a value of 42.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(55.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.2%).
Prior Value
(50.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (45.2%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(45.2%)

County: Hawaii Condom Use Among Teen Boys

Current Value:
55.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.8%), Hawaii has a value of 55.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.7%), Hawaii has a value of 55.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.7% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (81.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(81.3%)
<div> <p>FP-06: Increase the proportion of adolescent males who used a condom the last time they had sex</p> <p>The national indicator is defined differently as it is for adolescents aged 15-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawai‘i cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.</p> </div>

County: Hawaii Deaths Among Youth Aged 1-19 Years

Current Value:
22.2
Deaths per 100,000 population 1-19
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.9), Hawaii has a value of 22.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.4), Hawaii has a value of 22.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.4).
Prior Value
(21.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (18.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(18.4)
<div><strong>MICH-03: </strong>Reduce the rate of deaths in children and adolescents ages 1 to 19 years</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

County: Hawaii Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services

7.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.1%.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.1%.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1%).
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Illegal Drugs on School Property HS

Current Value:
26.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (25.4%), Hawaii has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Hawaii has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.7%)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.6%).
Prior Value
(31.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Illegal Drugs on School Property MS

Current Value:
10.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.1%), Hawaii has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Illegal Tobacco Sales

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Illegal Tobacco Sales

8.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.6%), Hawaii has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.6% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.7%).
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (1.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)

County: Hawaii Intimate Partner Violence Among Teens

Current Value:
6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.9%), Hawaii has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Teens

Current Value:
3.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.1%), Hawaii has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii LGB Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:

County: Hawaii LGB Teens Who Are Bullied

22.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.3%), Hawaii has a value of 22.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hawaii has a value of 22.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.5%).
Prior Value
(39.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-05: Reduce bullying of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs

Current Value:
46.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.6%), Hawaii has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.2%), Hawaii has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.3%).
Prior Value
(58.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-07: Reduce the proportion of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students who have used illicit drugs<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii LGB Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
34.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (39.1%), Hawaii has a value of 34.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(39.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.1%), Hawaii has a value of 34.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(48.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (34.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-06: Reduce suicidal thoughts in lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition includes making a plan or attempting suicide in the past 12 months. The data source is the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii LGB Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
45.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (52.4%), Hawaii has a value of 45.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Pregnancies Among Females Aged 15-19 Years

Current Value:
18.6
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.4), Hawaii has a value of 18.6 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(17.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Hawaii has a value of 18.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.9).
Prior Value
(18.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
<div><span>FP-03:  Reduce pregnancies in adolescents<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Property Crime Perpetrated by Adolescents and Young Adults

990
Arrests per 100,000 people aged 10-24 years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (879), Hawaii has a value of 990 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(879 in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (990) is less and better than the previously measured value (1,246).
Prior Value
(1,246)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teen Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teen Birth Rate

15.7
Births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.7), Hawaii has a value of 15.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Hawaii has a value of 15.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2).
Prior Value
(16.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teen Boys Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teen Boys Who Binge Drink

17.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.3%), Hawaii has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Hawaii has a value of 17.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.6% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for boys, while 'Teen Girls Who Binge Drink' presents the data for girls.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teen Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.8%), Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.3%), Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(22.3% in 2011)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (15.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(15.4%)

County: Hawaii Teen Girls at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

73.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.4%), Hawaii has a value of 73.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(62.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.8%), Hawaii has a value of 73.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (73.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.2%).
Prior Value
(66.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.8%)
<div><span>FP-05: Increase the proportion of adolescent females at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of high school students, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Teen Girls Who Binge Drink

Current Value:
15.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.4%), Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.8%), Hawaii has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.8% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. In order to account for the difference in the definition of 'binge drinking' for girls (4 drinks) versus boys (5 drinks), two separate reports are provided. This one is for girls, while 'Teen Boys Who Binge Drink' presents the data for boys.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Are Bullied

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.5%), Hawaii has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

Current Value:
14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Hawaii has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens who are Obese

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens who are Obese

18.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3%), Hawaii has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.8%).
Prior Value
(13.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens who are Overweight

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens who are Overweight

13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Hawaii has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Attempted Suicide

Current Value:
2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
9.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.2%), Hawaii has a value of 9.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Hawaii has a value of 9.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.5%).
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(39.0%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Binge Drink

11.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.3%), Hawaii has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Hawaii has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.1%).
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. Binge drinking is defined the same in the YRBS and NSDUH for high school students in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Drink Non-Diet Soda or Pop at Least Once Per Day

11.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.4%), Hawaii has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Hawaii has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.4%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages at Least Once Per Day

32.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (29.6%), Hawaii has a value of 32.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(29.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (26.3%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(26.3%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Drink Sweetened Juice Drinks at Least Once Per Day

11.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.7%), Hawaii has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(9.5%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

Current Value:
42.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.3%), Hawaii has a value of 42.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (45.3%), Hawaii has a value of 42.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.2%).
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
39.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.4%), Hawaii has a value of 39.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Hawaii has a value of 39.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (39.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Ever Used illicit drugs

Current Value:
37.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.8%), Hawaii has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1%), Hawaii has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (51.0%).
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
8.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Hawaii has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.3%), Hawaii has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need

Current Value:
22.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.1%), Hawaii has a value of 22.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
26.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (23.5%), Hawaii has a value of 26.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Hawaii has a value of 26.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (26.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of high school students in grades who get enough sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

Current Value:
2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (1.3%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(1.3%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

Current Value:
61.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.8%), Hawaii has a value of 61.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (49.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(49.5%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

Current Value:
1.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.0%), Hawaii has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
72.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (73.2%), Hawaii has a value of 72.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(73.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (72.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.6%).
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.3%), Hawaii has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), Hawaii has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.1%).
Prior Value
(21.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (8.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(8.8%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

20.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.7%), Hawaii has a value of 20.5% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (20.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.1%).
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (24.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(24.1%)
<div>PA-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. </div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (23.1%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(23.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.9%), Hawaii has a value of 25.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.8%).
Prior Value
(21.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(30.6%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

Current Value:
47.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (45.5%), Hawaii has a value of 47.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(45.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (44.9%), Hawaii has a value of 47.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.6%).
Prior Value
(44.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(56.1%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year

Current Value:
77.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (79.5%), Hawaii has a value of 77.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.9%), Hawaii has a value of 77.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(75.9% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.4%).
Prior Value
(78.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Skipped School for Safety

Current Value:
17.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.6%), Hawaii has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(9.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), Hawaii has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
4.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.8%), Hawaii has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Texted or Emailed While Driving

Current Value:
37.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (38.2%), Hawaii has a value of 37.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.1%), Hawaii has a value of 37.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.9%).
Prior Value
(40.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Alcohol

21.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.6%), Hawaii has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Hawaii has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.9%).
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
21.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Hawaii has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Hawaii has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes Due to Flavors

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.5%), Hawaii has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Marijuana

18.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.0%), Hawaii has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Hawaii has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Teens Who Use Sunscreen

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.1%), Hawaii has a value of 15.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.5%), Hawaii has a value of 15.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.5% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.8%)

County: Hawaii Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight

Current Value:
14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.6%), Hawaii has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.3%), Hawaii has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

63.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.2%), Hawaii has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(58.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.9%), Hawaii has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(53.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (63.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (61.3%).
Prior Value
(61.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(82.6%)

County: Hawaii Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
80.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (82.9%), Hawaii has a value of 80.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(82.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (80.2%), Hawaii has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(80.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.8%).
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (73.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(73.9%)

County: Hawaii Teens with a Healthy Body Weight

Current Value:
68.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.1%), Hawaii has a value of 68.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Hawaii has a value of 68.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(70.1% in 2015)
This distribution is based on the national average from YRBS, which is a national school-based survey of public schools.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (68.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.3%).
Prior Value
(72.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (76.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(76.8%)

County: Hawaii Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
77.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (73.5%), Hawaii has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (77.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.7%).
Prior Value
(78.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Teens With Disordered Eating

Current Value:
22.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.5%), Hawaii has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (22.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.2%).
Prior Value
(24.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Teens with Recent Depression

Current Value:
36.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.8%), Hawaii has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.3%), Hawaii has a value of 36.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.6%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.2%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Traumatic Brain Injury-Related ED Visit Rate

Current Value:
756.8
Visits per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (756.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (639.4).
Prior Value
(639.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Hospitalization Rate

76.6
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (76.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (71.1).
Prior Value
(71.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Violent Crime Perpetrated by Adolescents and Young Adults

96
Arrests per 100,000 people aged 10-24 years
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (235), Hawaii has a value of 96 which is lower and better.
US Value
(235 in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (96) is less and better than the previously measured value (183).
Prior Value
(183)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:
35.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (33.5%), Hawaii has a value of 35.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (35.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.6%).
Prior Value
(44.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Are Cyberbullied

Current Value:
28.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.7%), Hawaii has a value of 28.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.7%).
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
4.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.3%), Hawaii has a value of 4.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (10.1%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(10.1%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:
4.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Hawaii has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator includes adolescents ages 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. However, binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks on one occasional for girls and 5 or more drinks for boys in the NSDUH, but only as 5 or more drinks for boys or girls in this indicator for middle school students grades 6-8. </div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

42.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (43.8%), Hawaii has a value of 42.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(43.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (42.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (46.2%).
Prior Value
(46.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Ever Attempted Suicide

Current Value:
2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Hawaii has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.2%).
Prior Value
(36.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Frequently Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
2.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.8%), Hawaii has a value of 2.9% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Get Mental Health Help They Need

Current Value:
23.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (22.8%), Hawaii has a value of 23.3% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(22.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (23.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.3%).
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
45.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.1%), Hawaii has a value of 45.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(46.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (45.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.2%).
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of students in grades 9 through 12 who get sufficient sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. There is no national middle school survey for students in grades 6-8; however, Hawaiʻi has additional data for this indicator. </span></div> </div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from a Retailer

Current Value:
1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (0.9%), Hawaii has a value of 1.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from Social Source

58.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (58.5%), Hawaii has a value of 58.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (48.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(48.8%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Got E-Cigarettes from the Internet

0.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.3%), Hawaii has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
65.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (70.2%), Hawaii has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (65.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.3%).
Prior Value
(66.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Have Ever Tried a Cigarette

Current Value:
8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.1%), Hawaii has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (0.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(0.7%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
1.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.7%), Hawaii has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic and Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.0%), Hawaii has a value of 17.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.1%).
Prior Value
(20.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

24.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (26.0%), Hawaii has a value of 24.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.9%).
Prior Value
(28.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (26.6%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(26.6%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

46.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.0%), Hawaii has a value of 46.9% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (46.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.3%).
Prior Value
(48.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (48.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(48.8%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year

Current Value:
75.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.2%), Hawaii has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.4%).
Prior Value
(81.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Skipped School for Safety

Current Value:
8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.9%), Hawaii has a value of 8.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.9%), Hawaii has a value of 2.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes

Current Value:
4.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.0%), Hawaii has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:
9.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.4%), Hawaii has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.3%).
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Sunscreen

Current Value:
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.9%), Hawaii has a value of 13.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (13.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (13.9%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(13.9%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Were in a Physical Fight

Current Value:
18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (16.5%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of Computer and Video Game Time

54.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.3%), Hawaii has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(51.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (54.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (100%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(100%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens with 2 Hours or Less of TV Time

Current Value:
74.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.2%), Hawaii has a value of 74.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (86.8%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(86.8%)

County: Hawaii Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
74.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (74.6%), Hawaii has a value of 74.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(74.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (74.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (82.2%).
Prior Value
(82.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Young Teens With Disordered Eating

Current Value:
18.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Young Teens with Ever Depression

Current Value:
33.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (34.4%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
25.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (26.9%), Hawaii has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (25.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.