Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Family Planning
Health / Family Planning
County: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys
County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Teen Boys
75.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(80.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls
County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Teen Girls
75.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys
County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Boys
93.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(96.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(90.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls
County: Hawaii Abstain From Sex- Young Teen Girls
94.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(93.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Births to Mothers Under 18 Years
County: Hawaii Births to Mothers Under 18 Years
0.9%
% of births to mothers <18
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(0.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Condom Use Among Teen Boys
County: Hawaii Condom Use Among Teen Boys
55.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
HI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(57.7% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(81.3%)
<div>
<p>FP-06: Increase the proportion of adolescent males who used a condom the last time they had sex</p>
<p>The national indicator is defined differently as it is for adolescents aged 15-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawai‘i cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.</p>
</div>
County: Hawaii Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Yrs Education
County: Hawaii Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Yrs Education
11.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(15.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(11.1% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Hawaii Pregnancies Among Females Aged 15-19 Years
County: Hawaii Pregnancies Among Females Aged 15-19 Years
18.6
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(17.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(31.0 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
<div><span>FP-03: Reduce pregnancies in adolescents<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Pregnancies that Are Intended
County: Hawaii Pregnancies that Are Intended
53.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
HI Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(60.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.5%)
<div><span>FP-01: Reduce the proportion of unintended pregnancies<br /><br />The national indicator definition is limited to women aged 15-44 and uses live births as well as abortions and fetal losses for the denominator. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
County: Hawaii Teen Birth Rate
County: Hawaii Teen Birth Rate
15.7
Births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years
(2022)
Compared to:
HI Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
73.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
HI Value
(62.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
US Value
(84.8% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(36.8%)
<div><span>FP-05: Increase the proportion of adolescent females at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of high school students, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>
51.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
HI Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Prior Value
(55.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(65.1%)
<div><span>FP-10: Increase the proportion of women at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator only includes most effective or moderately effective methods of contraception and is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>
