Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Hawaii

Value
Compared to:

County: Hawaii Adult Cigarette Smokers with Health Insurance

Current Value:
94.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (94.5%), Hawaii has a value of 94.8% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.7%).
Prior Value
(93.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (96.0%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(96.0%)

County: Hawaii Adult Oral Health ED Visits

Current Value:
661.2
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (379.8), Hawaii has a value of 661.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(379.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (661.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (596.7).
Prior Value
(596.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adult Oral Health-Related ED Visits

Current Value:
843.4
Visits per 100,000 population 21+ yrs
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (560.1), Hawaii has a value of 843.4 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(560.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (843.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (826.0).
Prior Value
(826.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Advised to Quit Tobacco by HCP

Current Value:
64.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (69.2%), Hawaii has a value of 64.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(69.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (64.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.3%).
Prior Value
(77.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(90.7%)

County: Hawaii Adults Asked About Tobacco Use by HCP

Current Value:
35.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (37.2%), Hawaii has a value of 35.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(37.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (35.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.1%).
Prior Value
(57.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (61%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(61%)

County: Hawaii Adults Aware of the Hawaii Tobacco Quitline

Current Value:
72.7
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.3), Hawaii has a value of 72.7 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(71.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (72.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.3).
Prior Value
(71.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (81), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(81)

County: Hawaii Adults Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services

0
Adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet

33.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (35.2%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8%.
HI Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Hawaii has a value of 33.8%.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (33.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Did Not See a Doctor Due to Cost

Current Value:
6.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Hawaii has a value of 6.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (10.1%), Hawaii has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups

80.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (78.6%), Hawaii has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(78.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (74.2%), Hawaii has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (80.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (79.2%).
Prior Value
(79.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
75.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (76.8%), Hawaii has a value of 75.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (75.5%), Hawaii has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(75.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (75.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (73.1%).
Prior Value
(73.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Quit Smoking with Cessation Help

Current Value:
17.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.2%), Hawaii has a value of 17.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (17.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (43.8%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(43.8%)

County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist

Current Value:
18.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.1%.
HI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2%), Hawaii has a value of 18.1%.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (18.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
63.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (71.9%), Hawaii has a value of 63.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(71.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (65.2%), Hawaii has a value of 63.6% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (63.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.2%).
Prior Value
(67.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist

Current Value:
19.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (19.6%), Hawaii has a value of 19.3%.
HI Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Hawaii has a value of 19.3%.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (19.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.2%).
Prior Value
(17.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:
12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (15.9%), Hawaii has a value of 12.7%.
HI Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Hawaii has a value of 12.7%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (12.5%).
Prior Value
(12.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with a Diabetes Self-Management Plan

Current Value:
62.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (62.9%), Hawaii has a value of 62.8% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(62.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (62.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.7%).
Prior Value
(62.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (69.8%), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(69.8%)

County: Hawaii Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
86.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (88.4%), Hawaii has a value of 86.5% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.8%), Hawaii has a value of 86.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (86.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.7%).
Prior Value
(88.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (83.9%), the target has  been met.
PAN Plan Target
(83.9%)

County: Hawaii Adults with Health Insurance: 18+

Current Value:
89.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 89.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (90.4%), Hawaii has a value of 89.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.9%), Hawaii has a value of 89.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (89.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (93.8%).
Prior Value
(93.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with HMO Health Insurance

Current Value:
11.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (17.0%), Hawaii has a value of 11.6%.
HI Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.2%), Hawaii has a value of 11.6%.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (11.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance

Current Value:
9.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.7%), Hawaii has a value of 9.9%.
HI Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9%), Hawaii has a value of 9.9%.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.2%).
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Medicare Health Insurance

Current Value:
28.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (20.4%), Hawaii has a value of 28.6%.
HI Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Hawaii has a value of 28.6%.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (29.5%).
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Military Health Insurance

Current Value:
6.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.4%), Hawaii has a value of 6.1%.
HI Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Hawaii has a value of 6.1%.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with No Recent Dental Visit

Current Value:
36.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (28.1%), Hawaii has a value of 36.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(28.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (34.8%), Hawaii has a value of 36.4% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.8%).
Prior Value
(32.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with Other Health Insurance

Current Value:
5.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.7%), Hawaii has a value of 5.6%.
HI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.2%), Hawaii has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with POS Health Insurance

Current Value:
1.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.1%), Hawaii has a value of 1.9%.
HI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.9%), Hawaii has a value of 1.9%.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.9%).
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults with PPO Health Insurance

Current Value:
31.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (36.1%), Hawaii has a value of 31.1%.
HI Value
(36.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.9%), Hawaii has a value of 31.1%.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (31.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (31.5%).
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
4.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (2.9%), Hawaii has a value of 4.8% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (7.1%), Hawaii has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Alcohol Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
38.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.3), Hawaii has a value of 38.7 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(27.3)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii All-Cause Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
855.1
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (754.8), Hawaii has a value of 855.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(754.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (855.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (855.1).
Prior Value
(855.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Anxiety Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
49.4
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (172.7), Hawaii has a value of 49.4 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(172.7)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Children Transported by Medicaid for Dental Services

79
Children
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (79) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26).
Prior Value
(26)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Children without Health Insurance

Current Value:
2.6%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), Hawaii has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
8.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (7.6%), Hawaii has a value of 8.2%.
HI Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Hawaii has a value of 8.2%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii Delirium/Dementia Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

42.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (51.8), Hawaii has a value of 42.9 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(51.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Dentist Rate

64
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 64 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (88), Hawaii has a value of 64 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(88)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (64) is greater and better than the previously measured value (63).
Prior Value
(63)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Doctor Advised About Weight Among Obese/Overweight

37.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (42.8%), Hawaii has a value of 37.1% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the PAN Plan Target (41.0%), the target has not been met.
PAN Plan Target
(41.0%)

County: Hawaii Doctors of Osteopathy Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
5.9
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.1), Hawaii has a value of 5.9 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (5.9) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Drug Use Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

Current Value:
133.2
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (105.2), Hawaii has a value of 133.2 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(105.2)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
61.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (64.9%), Hawaii has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(64.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (61.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.1%).
Prior Value
(68.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(66.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
6.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (5.5%), Hawaii has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Hawaii High Risk Adults Tested for Diabetes

Current Value:
85.9
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (86.9), Hawaii has a value of 85.9 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(86.9)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (85.9) is greater and better than the previously measured value (58.2).
Prior Value
(58.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Plan Target (67.5), the target has  been met.
Diabetes Plan Target
(67.5)

County: Hawaii Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

Current Value:
10.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (9.0%), Hawaii has a value of 10.5%.
HI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Hawaii has a value of 10.5%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (10.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Cancer Plan Target (9.8%), the target has  been met.
Cancer Plan Target
(9.8%)

County: Hawaii Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services

15.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.6%), Hawaii has a value of 15.4%.
HI Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Hawaii has a value of 15.4%.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (15.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.3%).
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Maternity Care Services

Current Value:
3.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (5.3%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4%.
HI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room

29.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.4%), Hawaii has a value of 29.9%.
HI Value
(27.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Hawaii has a value of 29.9%.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (29.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Medical Services in an Urgent Care Facility

24.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (27.1%), Hawaii has a value of 24.2%.
HI Value
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.9%), Hawaii has a value of 24.2%.
US Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (24.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

6.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (8.5%), Hawaii has a value of 6.5%.
HI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Hawaii has a value of 6.5%.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services

7.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (10.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.1%.
HI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Hawaii has a value of 7.1%.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (7.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1%).
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

1.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (1.2%), Hawaii has a value of 1.1%.
HI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Hawaii has a value of 1.1%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.1%).
Prior Value
(1.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists

Current Value:
154
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (154) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (154).
Prior Value
(154)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims

Current Value:
57
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (57) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60).
Prior Value
(60)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims

44
Dentists
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (44) is less and worse than the previously measured value (45).
Prior Value
(45)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Medicare Healthcare Costs

$6,729
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value ($7,190), Hawaii has a value of $6,729.
HI Value
($7,190)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Hawaii has a value of $6,729.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii ($6,729) is less  than the previously measured value ($6,739).
Prior Value
($6,739)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
337
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 337 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 131 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (284), Hawaii has a value of 337 which is higher and better.
HI Value
(284)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (337) is greater and better than the previously measured value (321).
Prior Value
(321)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
69
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 69 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (77), Hawaii has a value of 69 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(77)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (69) is greater and better than the previously measured value (55).
Prior Value
(55)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Number of Practicing Physician Assistants

Current Value:
12.8
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (24.8), Hawaii has a value of 12.8 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(24.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.8) is greater and better than the previously measured value (12.4).
Prior Value
(12.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Nurse Practitioner Rate

Current Value:

County: Hawaii Nurse Practitioner Rate

47.6
Per 100,000 population
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (65.1), Hawaii has a value of 47.6 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(65.1)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.6) is greater and better than the previously measured value (46.8).
Prior Value
(46.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Oral Health-Related ED Visits

Current Value:
35.1
Visits per 10,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (18.8), Hawaii has a value of 35.1 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
94.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (95.6%), Hawaii has a value of 94.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(95.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (94.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.5%).
Prior Value
(94.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(92.4%)
<div> <div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the US Census Bureau- Small Area Health Insurance Estimates.</div> </div>

County: Hawaii Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
47.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (57.1%), Hawaii has a value of 47.0%.
HI Value
(57.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Hawaii has a value of 47.0%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (47.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (48.8%).
Prior Value
(48.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
29.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (21.4%), Hawaii has a value of 29.4%.
HI Value
(21.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Hawaii has a value of 29.4%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (29.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (27.9%).
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Persons without Health Insurance

Current Value:
5.2%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (4.1%), Hawaii has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), Hawaii has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Pregnant Women Who Talked with a Dentist

Current Value:
54.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (46.6%), Hawaii has a value of 54.2% which is higher and better.
HI Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (54.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.4%).
Prior Value
(60.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance

Current Value:
70.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.5%), Hawaii has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (70.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.8%).
Prior Value
(68.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (75.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(75.0%)
<div><span>AHS-02: Increase the proportion of people with dental insurance </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
1,799.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 1,799.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (1,581.0), Hawaii has a value of 1,799.0 which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(1,581.0)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Hawaii has a value of 1,799.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (1,799.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,699.0).
Prior Value
(1,699.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
78
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Hawaii has a value of 78 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the HI Value (93), Hawaii has a value of 78 which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(93)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (78) is less and worse than the previously measured value (79).
Prior Value
(79)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 1 or More Claims

37.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (37.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (41.4%).
Prior Value
(41.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Proportion of Medicaid Enrolled Dentists with 50 or More Claims

28.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (28.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Schizophrenia Disorder-Related Hospitalization Rate

11.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 5+ yrs
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (13.4), Hawaii has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
HI Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.

County: Hawaii Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
72.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (73.2%), Hawaii has a value of 72.3% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(73.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (72.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.6%).
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

County: Hawaii Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned During Pregnancy

36.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (44.6%), Hawaii has a value of 36.9% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(44.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.0%), Hawaii has a value of 36.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(40.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (36.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Had Their Teeth Cleaned PRAMS

Current Value:
69.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (81.2%), Hawaii has a value of 69.2% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (69.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.8%).
Prior Value
(74.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Needed a Dentist During Pregnancy

Current Value:
81.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (84.9%), Hawaii has a value of 81.0% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (81.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.4%).
Prior Value
(84.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women Who Visited a Dentist for a Problem During Pregnancy

14.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (11.4%), Hawaii has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Women with Any Dental Visit During Pregnancy

Current Value:
41.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (47.4%), Hawaii has a value of 41.6% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(47.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (41.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8%).
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Hawaii Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
65.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (70.2%), Hawaii has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
HI Value
(70.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (65.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.3%).
Prior Value
(66.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>