Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Hawaii Census Tracts
  • County : Hawaii Zip Codes
  • County : Honolulu Census Tracts
  • County : Honolulu Zip Codes
  • County : Kauai Census Tracts
  • County : Kauai Zip Codes
  • County : Maui Census Tracts
  • County : Maui Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes State: Hawaii

Current Value:

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes State: Hawaii

32.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Hawaii has a value of 32.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (32.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (48.3%).
Prior Value
(48.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Hawaii

Current Value:

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Hawaii

39.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.4%), Hawaii has a value of 39.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Hawaii has a value of 39.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (39.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Honolulu

Current Value:

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Honolulu

29.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.4%), Honolulu has a value of 29.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Honolulu has a value of 29.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (29.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.5%).
Prior Value
(44.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Kauai

Current Value:

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Kauai

35.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.4%), Kauai has a value of 35.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Kauai has a value of 35.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kauai (35.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (51.6%).
Prior Value
(51.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kauai value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Maui

Current Value:

Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Maui

36.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (32.4%), Maui has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Maui has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (36.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (58.1%).
Prior Value
(58.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(42.6%)

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes State: Hawaii

Current Value:

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes State: Hawaii

3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (3.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes County: Hawaii

Current Value:

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes County: Hawaii

4.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes County: Honolulu

Current Value:

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes County: Honolulu

2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Honolulu has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (2.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.9%).
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes County: Kauai

Current Value:

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes County: Kauai

3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Kauai has a value of 3.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Kauai has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kauai (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kauai value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes County: Maui

Current Value:

Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes County: Maui

4.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (3.0%), Maui has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Maui has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (3.4%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(3.4%)

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes State: Hawaii

Current Value:

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes State: Hawaii

14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Hawaii has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (14.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.6%).
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Hawaii

Current Value:

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Hawaii

21.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Hawaii has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Hawaii has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (21.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Honolulu

Current Value:

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Honolulu

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Honolulu has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Honolulu has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (12.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.0%).
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Kauai

Current Value:

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Kauai

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Kauai has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Kauai has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kauai (16.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.9%).
Prior Value
(35.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kauai value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Maui

Current Value:

Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Maui

18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (14.8%), Maui has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Maui has a value of 18.0%.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (18.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.4%).
Prior Value
(36.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens who Use Smokeless Tobacco

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens who Use Smokeless Tobacco

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Smokeless Tobacco State: Hawaii

Current Value:

Teens who Use Smokeless Tobacco State: Hawaii

2.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (2.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.2%).
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes State: Hawaii

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes State: Hawaii

12.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (12.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.6%).
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Hawaii

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Hawaii

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Hawaii has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (16.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.2%).
Prior Value
(36.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Honolulu

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Honolulu

11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Honolulu has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (11.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.1%).
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Kauai

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Kauai

15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Kauai has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Kauai (15.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.1%).
Prior Value
(37.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kauai value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Maui

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Ever Tried E-Cigarettes County: Maui

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (12.8%), Maui has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (15.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (23%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(23%)

Health / Tobacco Use

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes State: Hawaii

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes State: Hawaii

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (6.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Hawaii

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Hawaii

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Hawaii has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Hawaii (9.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.3%).
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Honolulu

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Honolulu

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Honolulu has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Honolulu (5.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Honolulu value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Kauai

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Kauai

7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Kauai has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Kauai (7.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.5%).
Prior Value
(22.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kauai value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Maui

Current Value:

Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes County: Maui

7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HI Value (6.7%), Maui has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
HI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Hawaii State value.
Compared to the prior value, Maui (7.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.7%).
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Maui value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>
Compared to the TPC Plan Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
TPC Plan Target
(10.5%)