Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Cancer
Health / Cancer
State: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening
State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening
78.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(83.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(92.1%)
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div>
<div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
State: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Screening
State: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Screening
77.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Median Value for States and Territories
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(75.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(84.8%)
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div>
<div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div>
</div>
State: Hawaii Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor
State: Hawaii Men Who Have Discussed PSA Test with Doctor
14.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(16.2%)
State: Hawaii Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test
State: Hawaii Women 21-65 Who Had a Pap Test
76.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Median Value for States and Territories
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(82.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Cancer Plan Target
(83.7%)
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
State: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
State: Hawaii Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
State: Hawaii Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
76.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Median Value for States and Territories
(75.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(74.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
State: Hawaii Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
State: Hawaii Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
73.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(74.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>
State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year
70.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(65.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
State: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
State: Hawaii Adults with a Cholesterol Test, past 5 years
State: Hawaii Adults with a Cholesterol Test, past 5 years
82.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Median Value for States and Territories
(85.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(85.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
State: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
State: Hawaii HIV Testing Among Adults
State: Hawaii HIV Testing Among Adults
30.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Median Value for States and Territories
(36.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
State: Hawaii HIV Testing Among Tuberculosis Patients
State: Hawaii HIV Testing Among Tuberculosis Patients
96.0%
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(99.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Weight Status
Health / Weight Status
State: Hawaii
Value
Compared to:
State: Hawaii Adult Weight Screening and Follow Up
State: Hawaii Adult Weight Screening and Follow Up
64.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
US Value
(61.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(70.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(37.8%)
State: Hawaii Children 3-16 Weight Screening and Follow Up
State: Hawaii Children 3-16 Weight Screening and Follow Up
69.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
US Value
(57.9% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(69.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
PAN Plan Target
(25.9%)
